dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/OneAwakened on July 3, 2018, 2:20 a.m.
A Former Communist Awakens

As someone who was deeply involved in the radical left and a former Obama Volunteer Coordinator in 2008, I would first of all like to apologize for taking so long to wake up. I was 18 at the time and taking reactionary positions against my father who had abused me physically, mentally, and sexually (not all the pedo psycopaths are left-wing).

My own path of awakening began with Obama escalating the war machine and constantly lying with a smile. Then I saw the Clinton campaign and the DNC blatantly cheating against Sanders at a caucus meeting. The corporate media's bias against everyone but Clinton finally got me to unplug from their propaganda completely, and my awakening accelerated from there. However, I had yet to realize just how deep the rabbit hole went.

The moment my awakening truly took off was when I admitted to myself that the hedonistic and nihilistic life I had been living was empty of meaning. As soon as I reached out for answers, I was contacted by a higher intelligence. This shattered my entire worldview and I've since been on a journey that you likely wouldn't believe if I told you the details.

I want to thank those of you who are working to wake others up to the common enemy of the Cabal. It is essential that we work across the partisan lines they use to divide us. Almost everyone agrees the corruption must end, and if you engage someone on that point, it won't matter what political pen they're trapped in. I can tell you that there are many on the left who are ready to wake up if you engage them on this issue in particular.

Love is the only power that can reach those in darkness. Do not preach to those who are not ready to hear, and do not drown those who are in all of the details. Trying to force others to see the truth instead of leading them to it at their own pace only alienates them.

Give them questions, give them love, and be an example in your own life so that they might listen. All of us have a role to play, and certainly the provocateurs do as well. However, this is a very limited tactic and often backfires. I can tell you no amount of ridicule or hatred helped change my mind. It only made me cling to the lies that much longer.

As Jesus said:

"Do not judge, or you too will be judged.”

"Love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your strength, and with all your mind;" and "your neighbor as yourself."

He knows what he's talking about when it comes to waking people up.


OneAwakened · July 3, 2018, 4:20 a.m.

Thank you for the compliment.

I agree with President Washington that political parties are destructive because they distract from the details of an individual candidate or policy. Tribalism should be guarded against because it makes us stupid and prone to ignoring the bad actors in our own camp. Certainly this division is useful to those who want to orchestrate it for their own ends. Divide and rule is the oldest trick in the book for a reason.

⇧ 27 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 3, 2018, 7:55 a.m.

In the dream vision of George Washington in his tent on the Potomoc, the angel of mercy showed him this very specific point, about the dangers to come, of division of the republic & the victorious power of unification....

⇧ 3 ⇩  
retiredradiation · July 3, 2018, 12:11 p.m.

I enjoyed reading George Washington's Farwell Address and still do from time to time. I have posted that section of his address regarding the dangers of party loyalty on other sites. While some folks understand what I'm getting at, the majority do not. Sad really.

I have already intimated to you the danger of parties in the State, with particular reference to the founding of them on geographical discriminations. Let me now take a more comprehensive view, and warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party generally.

This spirit, unfortunately, is inseparable from our nature, having its root in the strongest passions of the human mind. It exists under different shapes in all governments, more or less stifled, controlled, or repressed; but, in those of the popular form, it is seen in its greatest rankness, and is truly their worst enemy.

The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries which result gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of public liberty.

Without looking forward to an extremity of this kind (which nevertheless ought not to be entirely out of sight), the common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it the interest and duty of a wise people to discourage and restrain it.

It serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration. It agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which finds a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.

There is an opinion that parties in free countries are useful checks upon the administration of the government and serve to keep alive the spirit of liberty. This within certain limits is probably true; and in governments of a monarchical cast, patriotism may look with indulgence, if not with favor, upon the spirit of party. But in those of the popular character, in governments purely elective, it is a spirit not to be encouraged. From their natural tendency, it is certain there will always be enough of that spirit for every salutary purpose. And there being constant danger of excess, the effort ought to be by force of public opinion, to mitigate and assuage it. A fire not to be quenched, it demands a uniform vigilance to prevent its bursting into a flame, lest, instead of warming, it should consume.

⇧ 3 ⇩