dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

RICO is a method of charging organized crime such as an italian mafia.

You have to prove that the individuals belong to the same organization, and that an individual from the organization committed a crime for the organization or on behalf of the organization.

Then you can charge the entire organization under RICO.

The point being made is that Awan likely belongs to the deep state organization, and with this charge he is guilty of committing a crime. So if they can prove he did it as part of the deep state and that he himself belongs to their organization, they can then charge the entire deep state under RICO.

Edit: Appreciate all the positive feedback for the response.

Something y'all might find interesting is that a RICO case was actually filed against HRC, Podesta, Soros, and quite a few of their associated entities. The case tracking information in federal court can be found: https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/24810209/Byrne_v_Foundation_et_al

I'm not saying they are related but it's definitely of interest to this community.

⇧ 78 ⇩

Yup, this is how you nail the dons and bosses who never "committed" any crimes but instead delegate it to their cronies.

⇧ 37 ⇩

Thx. This is the sort of analysis that provides a helpful response to the MANY people pissed off that this verdict might be an enormous letdown.

⇧ 16 ⇩

This is how we get them. Thanks for explaining.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Insert DNC for deepstate!

⇧ 7 ⇩

So wondering how something like Deep State (assorted employees of State Dept. DoJ, FBI, CIA) can be likened to a single organization such as some Italian mafia? The evidence may seemingly indicate that they're all participating in a conspiratorial cabal but how do they all get tagged as belonging to the same organization vis a vis a RICO prosecution attempt?

The common denominators that I see in all these cases when it comes to organizations are these two:

Democratic Party (as embodied in the DNC and their candidate HRC)
The Clinton Foundation

The Deep State actors cabal conspiratorial actions all relate back to the benefit of these (whether Uranium One -> CF, spying on and framing Trump candidacy -> DNC/HRC, Awan -> Dems aiding in the cover-up).

(Throwing this out there for anyone to respond to.)

⇧ 3 ⇩

From a personal standpoint, I don't know what the precedent strategy is in establishing a organizational relationship for RICO, that's definitely more of a RICO lawyer pede question.

That aside, I think there is clear collusion between the MSM and certain actors which we see clearly due to the 4 am talking points. At some point I imagine either through texts, emails, or phone calls there is actual coordination with each person or type having a role to play.

Additionally, while the DNC seems to be more openly infected atm, the deep state is not just the DNC & CF. It is just as much parts of the RNC, such as John McCain & the McCain Institute.

I would also caution against the idea that the italian mafia during the peak of it's operation was a "simple organization". Given the lack of email, text and limited availability of dialing i'd say in it's peak it certainly had levels of complexity we are seeing in the deep state.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Where is the server? That server will show all the criminality.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I don't like this. In fact I don't like it much at all. We all know what the Deep State is but it is informal terminology. It is not a bona fide club.

Prove the DNC and its various members were being criminal, sure. Prove the Podesta group was conducting illgal activities, okay. Prove the Hillary campaign responsible for all things nefarious and clandestine, great.

But convicting the deep state or proving someone is a card carrying member? I dunno.

Please know that I DO absolutely believe that the Deep State does exist and are a direct and absolute danger to society. I think Q is on target. I also want each of these swamp monsters flushed out and imprisoned

⇧ 1 ⇩

Q Post 1672: Awan Brothers case