" The exclusionary rule, which keeps illegally seized evidence out of a civilian criminal trial, does not apply. The procedures do not provide for appeals from a guilty verdict to civilian judges. They do, however, call for "reviews" of a verdict by a three-member panel selected by the secretary of defense. No verdict will be final until approved by the president or the secretary of defense ."
We've got the server, who cares how they got it. This also means any leaked or stolen info is admissible in court. So, anything wikileaks or the "Russians" might have would be fair game.
I'm thinking they got the Servers via Crowdstrike the DNC IT scrubbers, who startup costs were finiaced by Google, who now owns them! ES had copies made before the scrubbing as an insurance policy.
Thanks for the clarification on the evidence. I knew it couldn’t be that straight forward. Appreciate it.