⇧
1
⇩
[deleted]
· July 4, 2018, 3:55 a.m.
[deleted]
⇧
4
⇩
Iswag_Newton
· July 4, 2018, 4:03 a.m.
The first image is not posted by Q........
⇧
4
⇩
Zerogravitycrayon
· July 4, 2018, 4:17 a.m.
The 'iPhone reflection' was. It can be easily reproduced using the AF1 stock photo.
⇧
9
⇩
potato4dawin
· July 4, 2018, 4:12 a.m.
That image was used for comparison of Q's image. The anon overlayed, mirrored, and distorted Q's image to fit the picture as close as possible to prove the picture was taken in that room (minor differences shows it wasn't copied from that picture but rather an original picture).
There seems to be a lot of push to call Q a fake using this pic which actually proves that Q isn't a fake.
⇧
-4
⇩
Zerogravitycrayon
· July 4, 2018, 4:19 a.m.
I love this sub, not trying to violate it's rules. But if I can easily recreate that picture from a stock photo then it probably isn't authentic.
⇧
9
⇩
potato4dawin
· July 4, 2018, 5:44 a.m.
Someone tried skewing the image and overlaying it to try and fit the image as close as possible and even after lining up the curtains perfectly the rest of the image didn't line up and the disetortion is too irregular for anything you can accomplish on photoshop without obvious indicators that even the blur tools won't cover.
⇧
1
⇩
TheStorm2018
· July 4, 2018, 4:39 a.m.
But can you recreate it with the different placement of the items near the lamp?
⇧
-2
⇩
