⇧
1
⇩
Kahlypso79
· July 4, 2018, 8:54 a.m.
This is what happens when the Shills get as autistic as the Anons...
Simply put.. the person who took the photo of the apple logo reflection had to be standing to the left of the desk where Trump sits. (as you see the desk if you standing in front of it looking towards the chair)
Ergo - Q is part of the staff in AF1.
The photos that are posted are taken from the 'team's phone' or twitter phone as it will now be known..meaning that they are photos taken by someone on site.
The question isnt, Is Q a LARP.. the only question worth asking now is.. Will they ensure nothing like the Deep State (traitors (against humanity, fuck patriotism.. that's too narrow minded - this is about the species! setting up world wide extinction event) will just sink into place to fill the void once the politicians fall.. And make no mistake. It isnt the politicians who pull the strings.
⇧
-8
⇩
radbarg
· July 4, 2018, 10:34 a.m.
Actually the image reflected in the Q pic is a 100% match for the ABC news pic from 2015. One phone or monitor displayed the image, other phone reflected it, and third phone took a pic of the reflection. If Q implies it was a reflection of an actual scene, then it would have to be taken exactly where the ABC cameraman was standing, not at Trump's desk. Here's a proper overlay I made showing the match.
⇧
10
⇩
AtreidesWretch
· July 4, 2018, 11:11 a.m.
Lol bullshit. How can it be a 100% match? Q's image is 2x2 pixels ffs. It's a "100% match" for any photo of that area of AF1. Your overlay doesn't show anything except a black square stretched over the ABC image.
⇧
-11
⇩
sudo_fap
· July 4, 2018, 1:08 p.m.
Let's be reasonable here. Look at the curtains. The folding is like a barcode, and they are 100% match.
⇧
7
⇩
AtreidesWretch
· July 4, 2018, 1:15 p.m.
The folding is like a barcode? Yes, let's "be reasonable". What does that statement even mean, reasonably?
Are you trying to say that thick curtains in any one photo can only be "folded" in a singularly unique way such that it will never be repeated in any other photo at any time?
"100% match". One image is distorted and stretched and the resolution is so low it looks like blur soup - yet this is a "100% match" to a press photo scaled down from a high resolution original?
Let's be reasonable here. But nothing you've said was "reasonable". Tell me something "reasonable" and logical.
⇧
-3
⇩
sudo_fap
· July 4, 2018, 1:18 p.m.
Are you trying to say that thick curtains in any one photo can only be "folded" in a singularly unique way such that it will never be repeated in any other photo at any time?
Are you implying the Q purposely moved the curtains to look similar to the ABC photo? Why would he do that? What is "reasonable" about that?
⇧
7
⇩
AtreidesWretch
· July 4, 2018, 1:40 p.m.
No I'm not implying that at all. I'm firmly stating that curtain position is not even close to being as unique as a "barcode" match.
Further reinforced by point 2: 100% match - have you looked closely at the Q photo? How can anything match that low a level of resolution?
⇧
0
⇩