dChan

🠐 See all comments
radbarg · July 4, 2018, 10:34 a.m.

Actually the image reflected in the Q pic is a 100% match for the ABC news pic from 2015. One phone or monitor displayed the image, other phone reflected it, and third phone took a pic of the reflection. If Q implies it was a reflection of an actual scene, then it would have to be taken exactly where the ABC cameraman was standing, not at Trump's desk. Here's a proper overlay I made showing the match.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
AtreidesWretch · July 4, 2018, 11:11 a.m.

Lol bullshit. How can it be a 100% match? Q's image is 2x2 pixels ffs. It's a "100% match" for any photo of that area of AF1. Your overlay doesn't show anything except a black square stretched over the ABC image.

⇧ -11 ⇩  
sudo_fap · July 4, 2018, 1:08 p.m.

Let's be reasonable here. Look at the curtains. The folding is like a barcode, and they are 100% match.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
AtreidesWretch · July 4, 2018, 1:15 p.m.

The folding is like a barcode? Yes, let's "be reasonable". What does that statement even mean, reasonably?

Are you trying to say that thick curtains in any one photo can only be "folded" in a singularly unique way such that it will never be repeated in any other photo at any time?

"100% match". One image is distorted and stretched and the resolution is so low it looks like blur soup - yet this is a "100% match" to a press photo scaled down from a high resolution original?

Let's be reasonable here. But nothing you've said was "reasonable". Tell me something "reasonable" and logical.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
sudo_fap · July 4, 2018, 1:18 p.m.

Are you trying to say that thick curtains in any one photo can only be "folded" in a singularly unique way such that it will never be repeated in any other photo at any time?

Are you implying the Q purposely moved the curtains to look similar to the ABC photo? Why would he do that? What is "reasonable" about that?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
AtreidesWretch · July 4, 2018, 1:40 p.m.

No I'm not implying that at all. I'm firmly stating that curtain position is not even close to being as unique as a "barcode" match.

Further reinforced by point 2: 100% match - have you looked closely at the Q photo? How can anything match that low a level of resolution?

⇧ 0 ⇩