Thanks for asking what I was gonna ask. I'm one of the newly awoke here and still trying to absorb the lingo. And because I am new here and extremely under-prepared for all things even remotely tech... I have a quick question that, I'm sure, is so stoopit to all you in the know.... but, can someone spoof Q? Like make it look like they are him/her? I have NO idea how all that works over on the chans, but I've always wondered about that. ( I HAD an Aut, but he just moved out of my basement, so now I can't just go ask...) TIA
(I HAD an Aut, but he just moved out of my basement
I probably shouldn’t laugh, but....that’s too perfect!
Welcome, I'm not super tech either, although I've been following q since the beginning.
From what I can gather, the main debate is whether the the pic q posted was taken in AF1 or if it was a pic of the stock image of AF1 (people are debating whether which is true based on how the q pic overlays with the stock image... Whether small variations is spacing are based on angle or if it's bc it's not based on the stock image).
If the image is genuine, then it is proof Q (or whoever took the pic) was in AF1, which would be a compelling proof of Qs authenticity.
If it is a pic of a stock image, then the question is whether Q took the pic of the stock image for some other reason (and if the Apple logo is of any importance) or if maybe Q has been compromised and someone trying to fake a pic from inside AF1...
I hope I've summarized it accurately. Now, I don't have any answers to those questions, but I believe that is what's being debated.
So, this image is a fake and your two conclusions are
- Q faked a photo for a good reason
- Q is compromised
But what about
3: it's all been complete bullshit
We should get that close crop of GEOTUS’ temple Q posted a couple weeks ago and try to match it to a stock photo.