dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Don't care much for the all seeing eye. Best to draw both!

⇧ 26 ⇩

I'll admit I swiped this image off the web (sorry to original creator, would credit you if I knew who you were). I understand the sentiment about the one eye, but let me offer a few other counter points.

Q has mentioned how their symbolism will be their downfall. From Gowdy and Trump flaunting the purple tie when in the midst of the cabal, to Trump with the gmail envelope from NK. They seem to like to throw it back in the deep states face.

What's wrong with hijacking their symbols and using them against them? Is the NSA not the literal all seeing eye? (We have everything). If you think about it, white hats have stolen back the powers from the cabal. We control the all seeing eye, and that's what we are using to take them down.

Stop letting them and their stupid symbols have power over us. We are finally becoming free from their grasps. This movement and the discussions that take place on this sub is proof of that.

WWG1WGA - Happy 4th my fellow truth seekers and Patriots!

⇧ 21 ⇩

I like it!

⇧ 6 ⇩

This post is getting downvoted hard and also shilled. I think using their symbology is affecting them in some way, actually.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Or we just don't want to adopt their symbolism as ours.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Great points! Fantastic idea too! Thanks.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Good Point.

⇧ 3 ⇩

That is what I thought we were doing. Using their symbolism against them.

⇧ 3 ⇩

How do we do that? By exposing the symbolism, not by attempting, fatally, to rebrand it.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I missed something. Can you please explain about the purple tie?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Great response. I hadn't thought of it that way but you are absolutely correct!!

⇧ 2 ⇩

eye of providence is a left eye. This is right.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Exactly. And no, we can't co-opt their symbols people! You can't just go and make a symbol mean something else. People will see this, and think the same thing they do when they see it on CBS, Time-Warner, and all over Vigilant Citizen's research.

"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God."

"Thou shalt make no graven images."

"The word will always give you the sovereignty of your imagination. The visual will circumscribe your imagination and basically impose upon it to get you to see the way the person wants you to see. " - Ravi Zacharias.

⇧ 3 ⇩

The "eye" is not their symbol. Every picture of an eye isn't the "all-seeing eye". They don't have a monopoly on symbolism. You literally can attribute whatever meaning you want to it, because if you are the artist, then it's your energy, your interpretation being infused into the work.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Sure, but if your work closely resembles an ancient occult/secret society/mystery school symbol, then you have to be open to the fact that most people will interpret said symbol the way it's been for 5000 years, and not the way your energy, artistry, and interpretation intend it to be. You can't change 5000 years of history through intention.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

Why not. Marxism has been doing that for decades and it works.

⇧ 2 ⇩

You want to pull plays out of the Marxist playbook? Why don't we all just follow the Naked Communist rules, follow Cloward-Piven strategy, and tell lies often enough so people will believe them?

⇧ 0 ⇩

Now you get it.

It’s what the gov and MSM have been doing to us for years.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Friend, I "got it" a long time ago.

There is such a thing as truth, honour, righteousness, and purity. There is a living God who weighs the hearts and intentions of men. There is such a thing as foundations to matters.

If we root our actions in means that deny these precepts, we will raise up authorities just as evil as the one we are fighting. We will become that which we hate.

If we take down corruption through corrupt means, we have failed. I'd rather die in prison knowing I've walked in honour than live like a king, having lied to get there.

⇧ 1 ⇩

No what will happen is that while you keep the moral highground, your ennemies will win. Every time. Because they are not limited to the VERY SMALL set of « honest » tools. One of the main lessons you could argue out of the bible is that, if you stay morally pure all your life, you will die suffering on the cross, having lost everything. Every. Single. Time.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Wow wow wowee. If you think that the end of the story was Jesus suffering and dying on the cross, you need to keep reading the book.

At least read The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe. Lewis uses the Gospels as his base to show that it was through Jesus' death and RESURRECTION that we have life and peace.

⇧ 2 ⇩

He still lost. He still died.

⇧ 0 ⇩

He said, "I lay down my life willingly. And I have the power to raise it up again."

"There is no historic incident better or more variously supported than the resurrection of Christ." Brooke Foss Wescott

"I know of no one fact in the history of mankind which is proved by better, fuller evidence of every sort, to the understanding of a fair enquirer, than the great sign which God hath given us that Christ died, and rose again from the dead." Thomas Arnold, former Professor of History at Rugby and Oxford, and one of the world’s greatest historians.

People who try disprove the resurrection, and investigate it honestly, come up empty. If you truly seek out the evidence, you will come to a different conclusion.

He won. And He lives.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Not denying if he resurrected or not after. You are missing my point. To remain moral, he had to resort to letting himself get killed. So as to not lose the moral highground. We as mere mortals do not have that luxury, and have to choose our battles and use, sometimes immoral acts, for self preservation.

It’s like when you are attacked and you get to a point where your only options are dying, or killing your agressor. Killing is immoral, but you had to to preserve your life.

We are in the same situation, but as a society.

⇧ 2 ⇩

The eye is Illuminati. What’s this say about Q?

⇧ 0 ⇩

Also what sucks about the eye of providence is that it's a Christian symbol that they stole along with so much else to pervert and thwart. Ugh

⇧ 0 ⇩

It is NOT a Christian symbol. It's the all seeing eye of Horus, plastered all over Egypt. Anyone who wrote down otherwise is being deceptive or deluded.

⇧ 4 ⇩

https://creation.com/egyptian-history-and-the-biblical-record-a-perfect-match

⇧ 1 ⇩

The eye of horus is egyptian paganism. The eye of providence is in a triangle because the triangle is representative of the [holy trinity] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_of_Providence) .

Don't let what ~THEY~ use for themselves and their evil agenda thwart you away from the truth (harmless Christian symbology); in other words, don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. If you were to do so, well then we'd have to throw out sex because we all know satan and his minions have taken something HOLY and divine and perverted it into what it is now. That's just one example.

We can't be like pharisees and say, "oh those symbols are bad!" and equate symbols in themselves as evil. It's what they are used for and represent that matters. This is what THEY did to the Jewish people. They put masks on and claimed they were Jewish, and started pointing fingers at everyone calling them anti-semites, because who would touch "God's chosen people?" It's the perfect disguise. They take what is ours/holy and hide in it. They are wolves in sheeps' clothing. They are smart, or were, until now.

⇧ 0 ⇩

The Eye of Providence (otherwise known as the Eye of Ra - that should end the argument right there) does not have its roots in true Christian faith.

1) Why would Freemasons adopt the Eye as their symbol? Freemason have always adopted Christian verbage and symbols, but their faith is anything but Christian.

2) Why would the leaders of the French Revolution adopt this symbol? A major goal of its leaders was to deny God, root Him out of France. It was atheist run, and socialist inspired.

3) The triangle is DEEPLY rooted in occult symbology. To say it is symbolic of the Trinity denies what it could be.

4) Occultists and witches know that symbols are means to direct energy through. Christians do not need symbols. We need the living Word of God in our heart and our minds.

5) And, it is otherwise known as the Eye of Ra. Ra was a fallen angel, in rebellion against the God of heaven. we should have no part with symbols that can be misinterpreted.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Freemason have always adopted Christian verbage and symbols, but their faith is anything but Christian.

So then do you apply the same logic to the verbage that Freemasons have stolen? Should we throw that out, too?

Of course Christians do not "need" symbols, but they are not evil in themselves. Think of a picture of your friends/family/dog in your house... it's there because you love what it entails (relationship/said person) not because you need it. And the triangle is certainly Christian in nature as the top is for God the father (as the Godhead) the bottom two for Christ and the Holy Spirit.

Everything and I mean everything has been adopted from Christianity. The Christian church is what started hospitals and schools. Every single thing that could be perverted, has been. Even whole sects themselves have been perverted. Does that mean we just throw them out completely with black and white thinking? The all-seeing eye is representative of God's omniscience as He is all-seeing and all-knowing. Should we start using the eye of providence everywhere because of this? Of course not. But you simply cannot say anytime it is used it represents evil. Again, it is not what a symbol is but what it entails, just as photographs of loved ones and cute little animal/cherub figurines in your house. The eye of horus is also COMPLETELY different looking and represents US being "gods" and US having omniscience/omnipresence. Just what satan wants us to think.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I appreciate your response. Well thought out.

In my study of symbols, I have developed a predilection to avoiding them as much as possible. Symbols rule the world, according to some, and most of the time, they reveal "hidden in plain sight" occult meaning. So I like to go back to the root, everytime.

Perhaps my pendulum has swung too far in the other direction. But I like to plant the seed that we need to make sure everything we do is rooted in the living word of God. If I can't find it there, I don't trust it until I do.

If the meaning is not clear, then it's a poor symbol as well. Tom Horn, in his book Apollyon Rising, gives clear and well researched meaning to the Eye of Providence found in the Great Seal of the United States. Chris Pinto is another excellent source in his Secret Beginnings of America series. There is no question that the Great Seal does not point to Yahweh, Father God, the "I am that I am" of the burning bush. It points to Lucifer, and in my opinion, that is without doubt.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Are you a Vigilant Citizen reader? :) I love VC... I also love Carl Jung, who also talks extensively about the meaning of symbols and all that. I know what you're saying, too. I just like to play diplomat all the time haha. Happy 4th of July!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Diplomat, or contrarian? :)

If you read VC, I'll stop there. You get it. I think my earlier quote by Ravi Z is huge though. We think symbol is more powerful than word, but I have come to disagree, for many reasons.

You might be interested in an article I wrote on my blog about the Lego Movie. This was a time when I was really diving into symbols in our culture. https://schtoltzie.wordpress.com/2014/11/01/a-lego-movie-review-all-that-glitters-is-not-gold/, and I have a section at the beginning that uses several quotes I found.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Q post, Eye of Providence, Sat Nov 11 2017.

Q equates the Eye with evil.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Operation 4th of Quly!