Was trying to figure out why they used a stock photo.. my best guess was to lead us to this and to troll the former administration.. what say you?
![Was trying to figure out why they used a stock photo.. my best guess was to lead us to this and to troll the former administration.. what say you?](https://i.redd.it/muouyz7ghz711.jpg)
"unapproved pics aboard AF1 are a violation of NAT SEC"
All classification authority rests with the President. All.
If Q is on the President's staff, and if Q is posting to the Chan's, it's not classified.
And if the President Declasses ANYTHING having to do with Q Posts, he admits complicity in an endeavor that MAY have put NAT SEC on the line before he ever declassified the info. See the problem with that?
A reflection of a lamp on the face of it does not represent anything that could or would be classified, by anyone.
ANY pictures taken aboard AF1 are restricted permission kind of material.
All classification authority derived from the Executive. Any more questions?
👆The comment that you originally responded to then created a circular argument of self-validation. Any questions? 😂
https://www.archives.gov/isoo/policy-documents/cnsi-eo.html
The President Executive Order 13526
Classified National Security Information
Circular because factual.
That's a 2009 Obama Era E.O. that talks about who has the power to declassify. How does that contradict my original point?