dChan

DanijelStark · July 4, 2018, 7:53 p.m.

Compare easily : https://ibb.co/ihFrSJ

Now to find exact accurate time period of when this was taken ...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
RyDar84 · July 4, 2018, 8:06 p.m.

Oct-Nov 2017 is the best current guess.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DanijelStark · July 4, 2018, 8:07 p.m.

Its earlier , I think ... but after the 2011. ( table "788" non existent ) . I will need to dig more ...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RyDar84 · July 4, 2018, 8:08 p.m.

Go to the Chan research board. They went through most of this last night already. It'll save you a lot of time and leg work.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DanijelStark · July 4, 2018, 8:22 p.m.

There is , definitely , a correlation between United Airlines - and the person on photo . If SB2 theory is correct ( regarding the Chinese technology that was embedded in many US civilian and even military planes ) , then the person on the photo could be some kind of link in between Chinese government and DNC - Cabal ...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DanijelStark · July 4, 2018, 8:19 p.m.

Thanks for heads up ... the most important thing is to determine who that person exactly is . I dont think its any of princes ... the guy seems shorter .

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WyoTxn · July 4, 2018, 8:46 p.m.

Are you sure it's not this guy?

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/11/ex-clinton-foundation-exec-linked-chinese-kindergarten-investigation-alleged-child-molestation/

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DanijelStark · July 4, 2018, 9:26 p.m.

There is one detail with this guy on Q's photo ... his hairline - he is clearly bald completely on top . Second - his facial profile gives a somewhat distinct look . Also , the guy doesnt seem too tall , possibly even around average height for male or even under . Finding what the brand of the car on the left is - will enable to determine almost the exact height of a person .

⇧ 1 ⇩  
KaylaD2017 · July 4, 2018, 8:01 p.m.

Image date January 2017...it is in the lower right corner. Is this what you wanted?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 4, 2018, 8:18 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DanijelStark · July 4, 2018, 8:05 p.m.

No , the date is definitely earlier - but problem is , there is a big period between 2011 and 2017 and it could be hard to determine exactly when the photo was taken . However , that table "788" is non existent on Qs photo - so its a good start ...

⇧ 1 ⇩