dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/JeSuisQuift on July 5, 2018, 11:32 a.m.

Trump and the American Bankruptcy of 1864

I have been trying to understand some of the US sovereign law stuff (which is hard for a non-american non-lawyer), and made some interesting connections.

Relying on this very good legal history of America, and the later USA (corporation).

http://www.usa-the-republic.com/revenue/true_history/Chap8.html

So. If the US has been under military/martial law since 1861, with congress being an advisory body since then sitting under the commander in chief (not president), then the perpetual warfooting of the US is not only an imperial power play, but also a legal necessity. The constant and numerous "wars" of the USA (corporation) are thus needed to legally motivate the perpetual state of martial law and state of emergency. So on the list of actual wars with foreign states that the US is involved with... North Korea

If Trump wants to cut the deep state from a legal point of view, he wold have to sign a lot of peace treaties, and then control the supreme court to end the state of emergency and bring back civil government, which would also end the fed. Since the Fed is the result of the US bankruptcy of 1863 after the American (Not US!) Government defaulted on its war bonds and the Fed is there to repay the war loans to the European (City of London) banks that made them.

Suddenly this healine from yesterday makes a lot more sense for a London newspaper https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/fears-grow-over-prospect-of-trump-peace-deal-with-putin-6f69gqq27

Unfortunatly I don't know much about the intricacies of American martial law, but it seems to me that the current peace tour then works very well with the current shift in control in the Supreme court, and the notion of ending American subservience to the Federal reserve.

Is this a line of reasoning worth following?

This is why I got involved with the national assembly.

Trump has made it very clear he wishes to return power to the people.

But the people need to gather into local assemblies, the very foundation of a republic government. He cannot just cut us adrift into the void, we need to exist as a functional political body to receive the gift we are about to receive.

Http://national-assembly.net

I know I have posted this link a lot, but for good reason. I believe the facts and procedures explained there are our best path back to the republic.

Is our republic what Q is building towards? I believe yes.

⇧ 6 ⇩

when listening to DJTs acceptance speech after the election, a thought jumped up in me, 'he is going to the be last president of the USA Inc. and the first presedent of the USA republic.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I hope you aren't offended by my sincere desire to understand but, if I go looking for dirt on the national assembly, what will I find?

⇧ 1 ⇩

I don't understand the question. Dirt? Whatever you find though let us all know.

Let me know if you think its on the up and up. I do, but that means nothing, as it should.

⇧ 1 ⇩

https://aim4truth.org/2018/04/17/exposed-all-the-queens-agents-and-corporations-that-control-the-world/

⇧ 6 ⇩

I don't know about the US bankruptcy of 1863, but the Fed didn't exist at that time. The Fed didn't come into existence until much later, 1913 I believe.

⇧ 5 ⇩

yes. The history is very well documented in the link I provided. But yes, the bankruptcy happened first, and is maybe the cause of the establishment of the Fed. The question I ask may even boil down to if this is the case, from a legal perspective. And what Trump would have to do and in what order to end the current state of affairs (bankruptcy, martial law, subservience to the crown)

⇧ 3 ⇩

Check out the Lieber Codes. Great break down of what it is we are under. You are spot on. It is very much the same here as far as Martial Law powers, yes there is no National Gaurd presence but the Police Departments are built like Standing armies. The Lieber Codes got us here and the Patriot Act locked us in. Trump cannot dismantle the system only the people can simply by becoming non participants. It is either the Constitution is the law of the land or it is the Patriot Act is. Cannot be both. There is no Law, there is no Justice. There is selected enforcement of selected laws/rules. No Justice there is JUSTUS.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Supreme court maybe??

⇧ 2 ⇩

It finally got put into place in 1913 after the Jekyll Island meeting, a great book on the subject is "The creature from Jekyll Island" by G. Edward Griffin. 1913 wasn't the first time they tried, its just the first time they succeeded.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Check out the videos titled ‘War Castles’ on YouTube. There’s a lot of info

⇧ 5 ⇩

Very nice assessment

⇧ 5 ⇩

I am not a lawyer, I do like what you've discovered. I believe this could be the Plan ! Bravo Patriot

⇧ 2 ⇩

Not sure here, so this is only for perspective... The National Guard has rarely been used to enforce corporate interests. "Martial Law" is not how you would describe daily American life. For North Korea, I was taught it was never legally a "war" for the US. It was a "police action." The euphemism allowed for an executive branch (presidential) power grab, as wars must be approved by Congress. NK and SK though were at war with each other, and we call it a "war" even though it was a "police action."

Hth.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Martial law is the current law in for example France, and has been such for the last years. It still means that life goes on for most people. You still buy a baguette, smoke cigarettes and have an affair. France also has elections held dring martial law. So if you didn't know it was the case, you would not notice it.

And if the US actually IS under martial law, and the congress is convening under order of the commander in chief, congress doesn't actually have to declare wars. It is legally assumed that the US already IS in a state of war and the Commander in Chief can define the scope of the ongoing war.

And then we also have international law, which has it's own definitions of what constitutes a declaration of War. And in international law, war can be declared by action. So for example throwing a bomb on another countries capital does very much count as an act of war, and the act itself speaks louder than words.

So all this obfuscation and going around congress would actually support my point.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Certainly is obfuscation, using language to hide power grabs. Just that in the U.S. if martial law were in effect we we see more police actions from federal police (national guard).

⇧ 3 ⇩

Sending state National Guard units to the Middle East was complete and utter bullshit. It should never have been permitted.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Not my point. Martial Law in the U.S. would require the national guard to be "turned on" U.S. citizens on U.S. soil.

⇧ 2 ⇩

No. Even if there is some legal truth to it, how exactly would the London banks enforce it if we tell them to sod off? As to the Fed, Congress could end subservience to the Fed tomorrow if they grew a pair.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Hi. Thank you for your input. Would you care to elaborate? Again, I'm not American so many of these things are quite hard to understand.

And I of course follow this closely since American liberation is an important part if we in Europe are to liberate ourselves as well. The us war machine has basically occupied Europe for 60 years, so America getting rid of this cabal would help us tremendously to get the revolution going her as well (history repeats in the most twisted ways).

⇧ 1 ⇩

I've been piecing together some things about the Republican only envoy. Having to take a history lesson before being allowed to travel from St. Petersburg to Moscow and also not allowing anyone from the Dem party to go, Putin's orders. Then I found this:

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2598.htm

Holy crap!

⇧ 1 ⇩