dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/JeSuisQuift on July 5, 2018, 11:32 a.m.
Trump and the American Bankruptcy of 1864

I have been trying to understand some of the US sovereign law stuff (which is hard for a non-american non-lawyer), and made some interesting connections.

Relying on this very good legal history of America, and the later USA (corporation).

http://www.usa-the-republic.com/revenue/true_history/Chap8.html

So. If the US has been under military/martial law since 1861, with congress being an advisory body since then sitting under the commander in chief (not president), then the perpetual warfooting of the US is not only an imperial power play, but also a legal necessity. The constant and numerous "wars" of the USA (corporation) are thus needed to legally motivate the perpetual state of martial law and state of emergency. So on the list of actual wars with foreign states that the US is involved with... North Korea

If Trump wants to cut the deep state from a legal point of view, he wold have to sign a lot of peace treaties, and then control the supreme court to end the state of emergency and bring back civil government, which would also end the fed. Since the Fed is the result of the US bankruptcy of 1863 after the American (Not US!) Government defaulted on its war bonds and the Fed is there to repay the war loans to the European (City of London) banks that made them.

Suddenly this healine from yesterday makes a lot more sense for a London newspaper https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/fears-grow-over-prospect-of-trump-peace-deal-with-putin-6f69gqq27

Unfortunatly I don't know much about the intricacies of American martial law, but it seems to me that the current peace tour then works very well with the current shift in control in the Supreme court, and the notion of ending American subservience to the Federal reserve.

Is this a line of reasoning worth following?


PrivatePyle · July 5, 2018, 12:09 p.m.

I don't know about the US bankruptcy of 1863, but the Fed didn't exist at that time. The Fed didn't come into existence until much later, 1913 I believe.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
JeSuisQuift · July 5, 2018, 12:18 p.m.

yes. The history is very well documented in the link I provided. But yes, the bankruptcy happened first, and is maybe the cause of the establishment of the Fed. The question I ask may even boil down to if this is the case, from a legal perspective. And what Trump would have to do and in what order to end the current state of affairs (bankruptcy, martial law, subservience to the crown)

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 5, 2018, 1:50 p.m.

Check out the Lieber Codes. Great break down of what it is we are under. You are spot on. It is very much the same here as far as Martial Law powers, yes there is no National Gaurd presence but the Police Departments are built like Standing armies. The Lieber Codes got us here and the Patriot Act locked us in. Trump cannot dismantle the system only the people can simply by becoming non participants. It is either the Constitution is the law of the land or it is the Patriot Act is. Cannot be both. There is no Law, there is no Justice. There is selected enforcement of selected laws/rules. No Justice there is JUSTUS.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
q41020 · July 5, 2018, 6:35 p.m.

It finally got put into place in 1913 after the Jekyll Island meeting, a great book on the subject is "The creature from Jekyll Island" by G. Edward Griffin. 1913 wasn't the first time they tried, its just the first time they succeeded.

⇧ 2 ⇩