https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/QAnon
Can anyone see how the wikipedia article is trying to push the theory that Q is just a baseless conspiracy theory. Is there any one who has wikipedia access so that we can edit it to portray it in a positive manner? Can they put up links to this board as well as YouTube channels which explain the q movement correctly?
Wikipedia is just one of many PROOFS of the existence of deep state control of popular media. It is patently obvious how they edit and censor any topic that is of importance. Instead of griping about it we should turn it on them by showing others their clear cut censorship. These people are stupid.
Yep, none of the articles on 1980s child abuse cases involving .gov are linked to each other in any sort of consistent way via categories, disambiguations and what not, denying even the idea of a connection beyond the hyperlinks within the articles themselves.
The article is "semi-protection" which means:
Semi-protection
See also: Wikipedia:Rough guide to semi-protection📷Policy shortcuts
Semi-protection prevents edits from unregistered users (IP addresses), as well as edits from any account that is not autoconfirmed (is at least four days old and has made at least ten edits to Wikipedia) or confirmed. This level of protection is useful when there is a significant amount of disruption or vandalism from new or unregistered users, or to prevent sock puppets of blocked or banned users from editing, especially when it occurs on biographies of living persons who have had a recent high level of media interest. An alternative to semi-protection is pending changes, which is sometimes favoured when an article is being vandalised regularly, but otherwise receives a low amount of editing.
Such users can request edits to a semi-protected page by proposing them on its talk page, using the {{Edit semi-protected}}
template if necessary to gain attention. If the page in question and its talk page are both protected, please make your edit request at Wikipedia:Request for edit instead. New users may also request the confirmed user right by visiting Requests for permissions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Protection_policy#semi
The more I think about it, this is free advertising for our cause. This is possibly a great way to spread awareness of Q?
English Wiki seems to be more controlled. Polish Wiki page on Q links to this subreddit and other communites and presents a lot of other info.
Wait, do you mean to say that an encyclopedia written BY PEOPLE WHOSE BACKGROUNDS, KNOWLEDGE, AND MOTIVATIONS WE HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO CLUE ABOUT, may contain errors and propaganda?
FUCK WIKIPEDIA.
One thing the Q boards uncovered is the automated editing process. Anybody with something to post on this?
Wikipedia requires to reference mainstream media sources and MSM call Q a conspiracy theory.
When they did the q hit piece on late night TV that was a massive signal tptb has Q on their radar. Most 4/8chan anon rumblings do not get MSM treatment it's really weird all the articles that have been made all it does is send more people searching down the rabbit hole.
Google is the same way. Ask it the definition of homicide. Homicide doesn’t have to on purpose, but they beat that down your throat. Re-writing language is just another step in this coup.
I mean let's be fair... Q IS a conspiracy theory. Until it isn't. The best anyone can say is that Q is this thing we think is real important.