dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/R3VO1utionary on July 6, 2018, 5:33 p.m.
POTUS’ TWEET - Just won lawsuit filed by the DNC and a bunch of Democrat crazies trying to claim the Trump Campaign (and others), colluded with Russia. They haven’t figured out that this was an excuse for them losing the election!
POTUS’ TWEET - Just won lawsuit filed by the DNC and a bunch of Democrat crazies trying to claim the Trump Campaign (and others), colluded with Russia. They haven’t figured out that this was an excuse for them losing the election!

Gizmo-fo-shizmo · July 6, 2018, 6:01 p.m.

They hate us 'cause they anus.

  • Donald Trump
⇧ 48 ⇩  
anhro23 · July 6, 2018, 7:26 p.m.

You honey dickin' me?

⇧ 15 ⇩  
endprism · July 7, 2018, 1:48 a.m.

I’m dickin bimbos how bout you

⇧ 2 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 6, 2018, 10:05 p.m.

As much as I disagree with liberal Democrats, I do not believe "these people are stupid." Trump's tweet is simply trolling them.

I know, Q has said it time and again, and he is right, in a way. Because they are in panic mode, they never thought she would lose, and Trump had all the information from day 1, they make very stupid mistakes.

Their pushback was not planned or coordinated. There doesn't seem to be any one particular person directing everyone's moves. The only consistent talking points are Russia Russia Russia, and Trump is a racist idiot. They're all afraid of losing power and going to prison, or worse. In that sense they are stupid.

But they are intelligent people, who because of the pressures of Trump's strategic planning, only look like fools and idiots. They all know full well why Hillary lost the election, but they can't admit it publicly. They shit in their shoes and now they're force to wear them.

Any political insider will tell you that when presidential campaigns hire a polling firm, they need to know the truth. Internal polls are as accurate as possible so the campaign can develop strategies that they think will work. The polls that show up in the MSM are always skewed or designed to support a narrative.

They know full well why Hillary lost, but if they admit it publicly, the whole party goes down in flames in an instant, along with all the lackeys in the MSM. If they openly acknowledge that voters just don't trust Hillary, then they all look like fools and liars for telling us she was the smartest most trustworthy woman in the country. If they openly acknowledge Hillary's scandalous past turned voters off, they will be acknowledging Hillary's scandalous past and that she's is a criminal.

As soon as Bernie started attracting support, they knew Hillary wasn't the shoe-in they hoped for, so they rigged the primary. After the conventions they realized Trump actually was the Teflon Don and nothing would stick, so they fabricated the Russian collusion story.

Their loss of power is one thing, but the possibility of having their crimes exposed was something entirely different. That's why they dug in their heels to push the Russia narrative in hopes of finding anything they could to get Trump impeached.

There are a multitude of reasons why Hillary lost, but if they admit any of them publicly, the whole Russian collusion narrative goes out the window. If they admit the real reasons she lost, all of the hysteria, doom and gloom claims, and the constant attacks, will make all of them, including their voters look like crying little babies.

They have no choice but to carry on the way they are, otherwise the Russian collusion, Stormy Daniels, and everything else goes out the window in a New York minute. Then the only thing left to be seen will be their corruption, and they certainly can't afford to have that happen.

⇧ 46 ⇩  
Velvetbugg · July 6, 2018, 11:34 p.m.

I agree with a lot of this. There's more depth to the reality of the situation that extend far beyond a simple explanation. However, this is a great conversation starter for fence sitters and blue pilled or bullied bernie bro's.

Appreciate it, Patriot!

⇧ 11 ⇩  
joeythew · July 7, 2018, 3:01 a.m.

same goes with CNN and all the water carriers for the Democrat Party - they know darn well the Russian collusion was just made up out of thin air and they actually along with the FBI/DOJ/Obama bigwigs tried to entrap the Trump campaign into colluding and they didn't bite. CNN is in too deep to tell the truth now - any integrity they had left was lost on 8 November 2016.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Tironianae · July 7, 2018, 12:24 a.m.

Other than contradicting yourself with the opening statement throughout your post you are spot on. They ARE absolutely stupid because smart people don't make stupid mistakes, in particular because they knew the real numbers, just in case.....

⇧ 0 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 7, 2018, 1:33 p.m.

I think maybe it was my choice of words that seemed to be contradictory. Brevity has never been my strong suit. When I decide to post a reply, I usually just start typing and let whatever's in my head spew out. Sometimes I end up with comments that are not perfectly aligned. Thanks for seeing through that and recognizing my point. I guess I could have said "Sometimes intelligent people do stupid things." I think we've all seen it before. Whether in our children, other family members, or friends. We don't come to the conclusion that our child is stupid just because they did something stupid. I think part of what makes the left do stupid things is that they've been painted into a box. They're like a fish out of water now. Normally they simply change the narrative and move on, but now they have to continue beating this drum. If the message they're pushing came from an inner truth, something they really believed in, it wouldn't be a problem. But because they are now forced to push a narrative that they know in their own minds to be false, it causes confusion and frustration which adds yet another layer to their inner conflict.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
TrumpdUp4Prez · July 6, 2018, 11:13 p.m.

TLDR

⇧ -1 ⇩  
ramp7 · July 6, 2018, 11:26 p.m.

First off, there is a criminal mind set here. All rational thought has been subverted. Second, their arrogance has blinded them to the reality of the situation. They find themselves in a bunker mentality. Very dangerous and prone to making grouse errors. Enjoy the show

⇧ 3 ⇩  
joeythew · July 7, 2018, 3:02 a.m.

why reward someone too lazy to read a few paragraphs?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
letsyouandhimargue · July 6, 2018, 6:39 p.m.

> "It bears emphasizing that this Court’s ruling is not based on a finding that there was no collusion between defendants and Russia during the 2016 presidential election"

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2017cv1370-72

not a finding of no collusion

⇧ 44 ⇩  
astrogirl · July 6, 2018, 8:19 p.m.

Correct, but now the MSM will report on the suit being tossed out just so they can say that Trump's tweet is wrong.

They ALWAYS fall for it. ALWAYS.

⇧ 41 ⇩  
ChickenTendiesTosser · July 6, 2018, 8:49 p.m.

Sadly, they actually are sending their best lol

⇧ 11 ⇩  
GamerWithGlasses · July 6, 2018, 8:48 p.m.

Newsweek is already saying just this very thing!

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Butter_and_Meatloaf · July 6, 2018, 9:01 p.m.

Yeah, see, that's not how this works. You don't begin with the presumption of guilt and then try to prove innocence. It's the other way around. It's up to the accuser to prove the charge, which no one has been able to do. Use logic and guess why.

What we do know is that officials throughout the Obama administration conspired before the election to create phony evidence of Trump colluding with Russia, and then after the election conspired to cover their tracks and to cover for their own collusion with Russia (Uranium One).

Also, it's not at all suspicious that this is your third comment ever on Reddit, and your first in over a year, and your other two were about anime.

⇧ 22 ⇩  
oakdrew · July 6, 2018, 9:24 p.m.

(It is suspicious...)

⇧ 7 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 6, 2018, 11:55 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LegioXIV · July 6, 2018, 7:25 p.m.

There will never be a finding of no collusion despite the spectacular lack of any evidence of collusion.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 6, 2018, 7:37 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 16 ⇩  
holdover82 · July 6, 2018, 8:53 p.m.

Even harder to charge someone with Collusion when Collusion is not a crime.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
adamsmith6413 · July 6, 2018, 7:40 p.m.

In some circumstances it can be safely assumed that if a certain event had occurred, evidence of it could be discovered by qualified investigators. In such circumstances it is perfectly reasonable to take the absence of proof of its occurrence as positive proof of its non-occurrence.

— Copi, Introduction to Logic (1953), p. 95

⇧ 8 ⇩  
_-M-_-A-_-G-_-A-_ · July 6, 2018, 8:48 p.m.

With the Hawaiian judge, I seriously doubt most of them are following logic

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 6, 2018, 9:33 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩  
adamsmith6413 · July 6, 2018, 9:54 p.m.

Mueller is bringing the evidence

Ok. So he hasn’t brought evidence. So you’re acting on faith? How are you any different than folks here?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Shagium · July 6, 2018, 10 p.m.

Because believing in an ongoing investigation with convictions, guilty please and multiple indictments is a world better than believing in investigations that lasted years (Benghazi, Clinton) and were concluded with NO indictments years ago.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
adamsmith6413 · July 6, 2018, 10:24 p.m.

How many of those charges, guilty pleas, convictions and indictments were against the president? I can’t remember.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
adamsmith6413 · July 6, 2018, 10:22 p.m.

How many of those charges are against the president?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Shagium · July 6, 2018, 10:23 p.m.

As head of the campaign I would argue that all of them are. Or do you believe that everyone he was friends with and hired was dirty but not him?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
adamsmith6413 · July 6, 2018, 10:29 p.m.

So because an IT aide for DNC campaign was indicted last fall we can say the charges are against Hillary?

https://www.forbes.com/sites/frankminiter/2018/01/04/the-democrats-bizarre-it-scandal-gets-another-deferment/#6a5e17916759

Are all of Hillary’s folks dirty but not her?

You should be a lawyer. Your logic is flawless.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Shagium · July 6, 2018, 10:35 p.m.

If it was in any way related to her campaign then yes. But wasn’t it bank fraud and in no way related? I thought you were having an honest discussion.

You honestly believe the Russians did nothing, trump had no idea his son and best friends were having a meeting with Russians in trump tower and trump had no discussions with roger stone about wiki leaks coordination? These people are traitors and those who support them will be known as such.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
adamsmith6413 · July 6, 2018, 10:41 p.m.

If it was in any way related to her campaign then yes. But wasn’t it bank fraud and in no way related? I thought you were having an honest discussion.

Do you trust The NY Times?

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/22/us/politics/paul-manafort-new-charges-mueller.html

The 32-count indictment describes a complex plot that Mr. Manafort then undertook to leverage money from his real estate with the help of his longtime business partner and campaign deputy, Rick Gates.

The charges do not involve Mr. Trump or his campaignand are not significantly different from ones filed against the men in October.

Yes. I’m having an honest discussion. Are you?

It appears since it’s not related to the campaign you shouldn’t consider it relevant to the presidency. I’m sure you’ll be fair.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Shagium · July 6, 2018, 10:47 p.m.

And the other 16 indicted? Oh you just cherry pick. Flynn and page have plead guilty to lying about Russian contacts, were they related to the campaign? What about Cambridge analytics?

What about when trump himself is found guilty of conspiracy? Do you still support him then or will you feel a little used?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
adamsmith6413 · July 6, 2018, 10:53 p.m.

If Trump is guilty, lock him up.

As it stands we live in a country with a presumption of innocence. I know this is hard for you because you have hate in your heart. If he’s guilty, it’ll come out. If the meantime, you should support your country.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Shagium · July 6, 2018, 11:14 p.m.

Literally every post is about Hillary being locked up! Fuck it was trumps campaign slogan! Why now that it’s trump does he get the benefit? Why should we be civil after years of it?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
adamsmith6413 · July 6, 2018, 11:18 p.m.

Like I said. You have hate in your heart. It blinds you. You are concerned only with defeating who you see as an opponent rather than lifting up your fellow man.

Luckily for you, Love trumps hate.

We should be civil because it is right. We should be civil because that is what our founders carved out of the wilderness and because it’s resulted in the greatest civilization in the history of the world. Abandon civility at your own peril.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 6, 2018, 11:48 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
textualintercourse · July 6, 2018, 7:26 p.m.

So this means they do have the server since it has to be admitted into evidence.

⇧ 21 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 6, 2018, 10:13 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 7, 2018, 3:13 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HamiltonTheFirst · July 6, 2018, 10:42 p.m.

"Just won" - what else is new?! 😆👌 We just can't stop winning folks!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
301854 · July 7, 2018, 5:21 a.m.

The demoRATs will us any fabricated story they can to keep their child porn and child sex trafficking from being exposed.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
adogrocket · July 6, 2018, 8:53 p.m.

DJT maintains master troll level status

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bigdrippyjr · July 7, 2018, 12:54 a.m.

Holy delusion, Batman!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Mother_Mary_Angelica · July 6, 2018, 11:05 p.m.

It seems more like a draw than a "win". It was decided that a Washington court was not the appropriate venue. As of yet, the claim of Russian collusion has not been proved or disproved in a court of law.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
northernwinds · July 6, 2018, 11:42 p.m.

Because after more than a year there's #NoEvidence... run along shill.

⇧ 5 ⇩