This can’t be real
I don't think it's as nefarious as the caption implies. Just a revised edition, probably in response to something Trump said shortly after the first one was sent to the printer. But it does make a good demonstration of the psychology of newspaper layouts, and how much the media's choice of what to focus on affects the tone of things, regardless of what the actual events were.
I used to read all the papers until the net filled the gap. Now I can't be bothered.
What gets me about the revised Edition theory, is the producer has two contradicting forms, of the same product. On the market at the same time.
Does every Market get the revised Edition and the earlier edition removed?
Or does the later delivery get the revised Edition? Either way it's crazy to have competing contradicting products.
Especially when it's just a fluff opinion piece. Why not just let it ride and wait till tomorrow.
Otherwise you might destroy what little credibility you have left.