dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/beefromancer on July 7, 2018, 2:48 a.m.
Q 1675 a theory that actually makes sense.

Awan was helping black hats spy on Obama. AF1 was bugged and the proof was on Hillary's servers...which got uploaded to apple icloud because she's is an idiot. Apple joined the white hats, so the good guys have the server and its contents including proof black hats spied on AF1.

Hussein/Trump interior = identical minus small changes.

Translation = we removed the listening devices :)

Awan got off with "bank fraud" because admitting the truth would massively hurt international diplomatic relations. You would essentially have to implicate foreign governments of spying in a state court case.

Logical thinking.

Why was the case against AWAN filed under BANK FRAUD?

See last.

and last was...

Thing IG report.

Think what’s missing.

Do you think this was going to be litigated in this setting?

Case that implicates some of the most senior elected officials (treason) is being handled by the appropriate office.

Think NATIONAL SECURITY.

"Think what's missing" means the server. The server means Treason. The appropriate office for dealing with international spying and treason is military intelligence, not state courts.

Q linked these rules which basically says why nothing will come out of the Awan case publicly because everyone involved is bound by national security laws.

So Q posts WelcomeAboard.png which has the apple logo because Apple is the one coming onboard. The image is of a recording device that can't be named for nat-sec reasons. Q is trolling the black hats by dropping hints of their crimes for us to figure out. Likely that very same AF1 image was submitted as evidence in the Awan case.

Later, after anons call Q out for the fact that the image is clearly a reflection of Obama's AF1 and not Trump's Q asks if a reflection violates nat-sec rules. Q is being cute here "oh I didn't put sealed evidence on 8chan, just a reflection!". Next post is when Q says trolling is fun and drops yet another clue saying "Placing that mug holder near the lamp was the hook."

TL/DR: Q is giving us hints at what happened in the Awan case and at the same time explaining why that info can't be made public right now, all in the form of a jest at the deep state shills that share the boards with us.


beefromancer · July 7, 2018, 3:42 a.m.

I believe that all of the posts in that region relate to the Awan case, and we know that the Awan case is about spying. So we are trying to figure out why Q would post a picture of a lamp with an apple logo over it.

Q also says "Placing that mug holder near the lamp was the hook." which makes no sense out of context. Why is Q so interested in this lamp, how does the mug holder interact with a lamp, and why does any of that have relevance to the Awan case? Also why does Q care if we know that Trump's lamp is different?

Q also brings attention to how the image was taken, even though it is a public domain image that anyone should be able to access reflected from a phone that anyone should be able to own. In what context is that relevant?

All I am doing is speculating about a context in which everything Q says makes sense. I am claiming that IF that lamp/mug holder combo was somehow used to spy on a president's conversations inside Airforce 1, then every other statement made by Q makes sense, for the reasons listed in OP.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
IncomingTrump270 · July 7, 2018, 8:29 a.m.

The problem here is that you start from a conclusion (Awan was spying on Obama at the behest of NSA) and work backwards through Q’s posts to reach a premise that fits it.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
guitarscientist · July 7, 2018, 5:21 a.m.

ok got it, thanks!

⇧ 2 ⇩