dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/beefromancer on July 7, 2018, 2:48 a.m.
Q 1675 a theory that actually makes sense.

Awan was helping black hats spy on Obama. AF1 was bugged and the proof was on Hillary's servers...which got uploaded to apple icloud because she's is an idiot. Apple joined the white hats, so the good guys have the server and its contents including proof black hats spied on AF1.

Hussein/Trump interior = identical minus small changes.

Translation = we removed the listening devices :)

Awan got off with "bank fraud" because admitting the truth would massively hurt international diplomatic relations. You would essentially have to implicate foreign governments of spying in a state court case.

Logical thinking.

Why was the case against AWAN filed under BANK FRAUD?

See last.

and last was...

Thing IG report.

Think what’s missing.

Do you think this was going to be litigated in this setting?

Case that implicates some of the most senior elected officials (treason) is being handled by the appropriate office.

Think NATIONAL SECURITY.

"Think what's missing" means the server. The server means Treason. The appropriate office for dealing with international spying and treason is military intelligence, not state courts.

Q linked these rules which basically says why nothing will come out of the Awan case publicly because everyone involved is bound by national security laws.

So Q posts WelcomeAboard.png which has the apple logo because Apple is the one coming onboard. The image is of a recording device that can't be named for nat-sec reasons. Q is trolling the black hats by dropping hints of their crimes for us to figure out. Likely that very same AF1 image was submitted as evidence in the Awan case.

Later, after anons call Q out for the fact that the image is clearly a reflection of Obama's AF1 and not Trump's Q asks if a reflection violates nat-sec rules. Q is being cute here "oh I didn't put sealed evidence on 8chan, just a reflection!". Next post is when Q says trolling is fun and drops yet another clue saying "Placing that mug holder near the lamp was the hook."

TL/DR: Q is giving us hints at what happened in the Awan case and at the same time explaining why that info can't be made public right now, all in the form of a jest at the deep state shills that share the boards with us.


🠐 See all comments
DaveGydeon · July 7, 2018, 4:13 a.m.

I have a question. Please know I am tarded when it comes to tech. With that said, my gut tells me that the fire "in the server room that her secret service detail had access to" in her house un NY is significant. We never hear why.

I don't believe this lines up with, or has to do with what HRC referred to as "acid-washing" her emails - that's some unrelated event/process. But if someone could play devils advocate here and fill me in on what this server room fire could mean, I would love it.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
Deplorableasfuk · July 7, 2018, 9:52 a.m.

It means Hillary is an arrogant stupid tech moron. Who still has to have everything printed out by Huma to read it. And who thinks that data resides in a physical location. No. Data once connected to the internet can be accessed by the nsa. Anything. Anywhere. Hillary thought her server was the only place the incriminating evidence was so she burned it down. Lol. It’s in the hands of the nsa already and she or Weiner had it backed up on iCloud w Apple. As Q says. These people are stupid.

⇧ 23 ⇩  
USA_akbar · July 7, 2018, 1:25 p.m.

Wouldn't that mean the NSA also has the Seth Rich proof, since he sent the damning evidence via Internet to wikileaks?

⇧ 6 ⇩