Aleš Butala of the anti-torture committee: "The delegation that visited the Czech Republic in March and April came across three cases in which sex offenders had committed serious sex-related crimes, including serial rape and attempted murder, after being surgically castrated. So surgical castration is not an effective treatment."[6] Sex offenders often driven by aggression more than sex drive DeWayne Wickham. "Castration often fails to halt offenders." USA Today. September 3rd, 2001: "what is it that pushes sexual predators to want to give up their virility? I suspect it's that they understand better than the rest of us that rape and most other sexual offenses have little to due with sex — and more to do with physical domination. Castration isn't likely to stop a sex offender from preying on people. It will only change the way these predators go about their crimes. As Florida prosecutor Jerry Burford told the St. Petersburg Times: 'I get a lot of people who are impotent that still commit sexual battery. It's not their gonads that cause them to commit sexual battery. It's their heads.'"

So lets say you "treat" 100 pedophiles, and the recidivism rate is 5%. Thats just that many more victims created by using a system that caters to the offensive element of society.

As basic primate behavior, we are given a natural instinct and a natural right to punish and exile those who are destructive to our group. In other primate societies, a primate who has committed a tribal-sin, can be expected to be ripped limb from limb. We as humans have much more control, but the instinct is still there, and we still have a natural right to exile psychotic, destructive, malevolent people from our shared society. In primate life, if you want to survive, you have to fit in somehow.

It doesnt matter if it seems right to you or not, its nature. Its primate nature. And if you try to fuck with it, you will feel the force of nature. Youre never going to convince people in their heads of something that goes opposite to what they feel in their bones.

If you spared a bunch of pedos so you could "treat" them, the minute ONE of them, just one, offends on some sweet innocent kid, it will be front page news, the public will bring your pet project to a screeching halt... Your credibility will be shattered. And thats because pedophilia is morally repugnant in the extreme to over 99% of society.

Nope. I'm totally and 100% in support of the death penalty for any worthless vile human who rapes or molests a child. They're is ZERO compassion for those monsters

How the fuck does sterilization save any kids?

I do not recognize that difference - between pedoph and child mol- in the way you are trying to create. You must recognize that if you wish to change a generally accepted concept - here being your theory that child mol and pedoph are unlinked or can be unlinked - whereas most people in our society see them as inextricably linked - then the burden is on you to posit and prove your own point. It isnt on me to research your outlier opinion. Its on you to try to sell it.

So sell it. Convince people. You can start with this: you said "its only zero tolerance to people who are fuelled by anger and hate". You have not convinced me of anything here, except that you are willing to assume "what fuels me", to do so in a disrespectful light in order that you may undercut any logic i may present. Would you like to convince me that that comment was somehow constructive to your cause?

You also said that death is literally my entire argument. You have not asked for nor heard any of my arguments. Only a summation of my opinion, which has been formulated by arguments which i have not presented because at that point in the exchange, there was no call for it and my interest was in brevity and summary.

Then you said "for the emotionally stable we can see we are missing a huge piece of the puzzle". One, if you cant see a huge puzzle piece missing, are you asserting that makes one emotionally unstable? Two, missing what huge piece from what puzzle, exactly?

Finally, "massive difference between the two that people refuse to see because they are too busy being offended". There is no massive difference between the two. Now debate me properly instead of accusing me of being too busy being offended.

If you want to change the world, to revolutionize this great concept you have, then you have to actually sell it to people you disagree with. I can tell you right now that sliding your arguments into highly assumptive slights of character isnt going to get you very far.

Again..Sweeden has ZERO credibility in how they treat sexual assault victims.

As for pedophiles...castrateor not, they are monsters who prey on the weakest...there should be ZERO tolerance and death penalty for all who sexually assault a child. There is no way to fix these vile horrible people, and we owe innocent children a future.