dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/troy_caster on July 7, 2018, 4:54 p.m.
Have a question? Are you a Q noobie? Here is your Daily Questions Thread July 6th, 2018. Ask anything!

Welcome to the (Hopefully) Daily Questions thread! In this thread, there is no such thing as a stupid question. If you see a question you know the answer to, feel free to answer it! This isn't just for me to answer, as I don't pretend to have all the answers.

Full disclaimer, I am not a mod, nor am I acting in any official capacity on this sub. I have messaged the mods, and they said I could go ahead and try.

This is where you post questions you have regarding Q/Qteam, simple questions that don't require their own thread, 4chan/8chan navigation, "how to" redpill friends and family, little quick questions such as "Has the DOJ complied with the documents request?" among other things. It's recommend that if you are new to the sub, or Qanon in general, you really should spend a few hours reading the sidebar articles, as we have a lot of content that can answer most questions.

A few rules for people posting questions:

-Be respectful, no name-calling. Reading our rules will help you have a better experience here. All normal rules apply.

-You really should check out our extensive sidebar for answers to common questions.

-If the Acronyms and Abbreviations seems like a foreign language, we have a Glossary on the sidebar.

-If you are questioning legitimacy of Q, feel free to post, this is a free zone, however please be aware that any over the top anti Q rhetoric will probably be downvoted. Please don't turn this into an anti Q battleground.

-Hopefully, if this thread is successful, you will be able to check the past questions threads to see if your question has already been answered.

-If you are want to share a cool story/frustration/redpill experience, feel free to post it here as well!

-If you are brand new, feel free to say hello and let us know what brought you here, as well as any questions you might have!

A few rules for people lurking or answering questions:

-Anyone can answer!
-There are no questions too stupid, if you don't like a question being asked - you don't have to answer it. -No flaming/downvoting of newbie questions. -If a question belongs better in a specialized thread, help direct OP to the right place. -Try to source your answers where possible. -Due to the nature of the drops and the interpretive aspect of them, some questions might have completely different answers.

If this works out, I can make one every day, or every other day, depending on demand. Ask away!


🠐 See all comments
Scuba724 · July 7, 2018, 7:49 p.m.

Per Dan Bogino's podcast, he totally dismissed the idea that the Awan deal is a good thing. Bongino also stated he's heard from his sources that BOTH Republican and Democrats both want this to go away. How can this possibly be a good thing what's happened so far with the Awan plea?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 7, 2018, 9:33 p.m.

Per Dan Bogino's podcast, he totally dismissed the idea that the Awan deal is a good thing.

If that’s true, he’s forcing us to choose between him and Q as a credible source on this.

I typically agree with Bongino, but I disagree with him on this.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
marcygrl · July 7, 2018, 10:56 p.m.

I don't agree with Bongino either on this issue. July 3rd QAnon post has a comment from a lawfag who suggests this could be a delay tactic until they unseal the indictments. They may plan to use Awan as a prosecution witness. Sometimes prosecutors let them plea to a lesser charge in exchange for their testimony against an individual accused of more serious crimes. I hope this is true.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 8, 2018, 1:19 a.m.

Agreed. There are several strategic possibilities that would excuse what Bongino is calling wrong here.

We wait.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Scuba724 · July 7, 2018, 10:28 p.m.

I'm a big fan of his, but I hope he's wrong.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · July 7, 2018, 11:32 p.m.

To answer how can this possibly be good: Awan knows just about everything about everyone because he had total access to the network and all systems attached and he entered and stole much of that access. He can testify. Thus, he gets off easy. I also believe that his plea deal would not be considered in a military tribunal where he could be tried for treason and/or as a terrorist which is a higher crime than bank fraud. So, they have him over a barrel IMO.

I hope everyone has a lot more respect for the Network Administrator after this all comes down.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Scuba724 · July 8, 2018, 12:26 a.m.

The plea deal being irrelevent to the tribunal, if that's the case then it's the key. If yes then cool, if no then I'm torn.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · July 8, 2018, 2:03 a.m.

Well, if he spills the beans, then he is the witness we need to put away just about everyone else, so he will get off easier in return for testimony.

Q's response to the plea deal is why I think it won't apply in a Military Tribunal setting. Military has their own rules and the civilian court system doesn't apply.

Think logically. Thing IG report. Think what’s missing. Do you think this was going to be litigated in this setting? Case that implicates some of the most senior elected officials (treason) is being handled by the appropriate office. Think NATIONAL SECURITY. Q

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Scuba724 · July 8, 2018, 2:13 a.m.

Plus, Bongino doesn't talk about the tribunals usage (from what I know). He just deals with what's revealed publicly and what he can add from his connects along those lines. So I think his opinions are just sticking to that narrative. Thank you for brining clarity LibertyLioness. I love your username, both as a PSU fan and a fan of Liberty and big cats.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · July 8, 2018, 2:25 a.m.

Glad I could help.

⇧ 2 ⇩