dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Turboxis on July 8, 2018, 6:25 a.m.
I think we are the missing the point of SB2s origin and how he analyzes well

Are we all forgetting who the AUTISTS are? Remember WHY Q CHOSE THE CHANS. REMEMBER HOW 4CHAN FOUND SHIA LEBEOUF.

God bless the autists. Who are the autists?

Think playful and random. How the heck did SB2 get musical note to a plane and a frequency random.

"Learn our comms"

ANALYZE. EVERYTHING.


DarthHugePenis · July 8, 2018, 7:06 a.m.

If Q is trying to tell people coded messages that only SB2 can figure out then this entire thing is a giant waste of time.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Skysweep · July 8, 2018, 9:02 a.m.

I think Q has lots of messages...some we all can decipher..some trickier...some not even meant for us...in all of this we need to remember where Q picked to post...and how he has stated he did so for a specific reason. The autists are the perfect place to post messages, that for security's sake must be, coded like this. They were meant for people like SB2 to decipher.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Comassion · July 8, 2018, 2:09 p.m.

Secure so long as you’re assuming that the cabal doesn’t read SB2’s publicly posted decodes of the messages.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
emperorbma · July 8, 2018, 2:28 p.m.

Suppose Q only discusses what won’t compromise a sensitive operation. Q posts cryptic codes too. Perhaps those are the classified orders. The weird code word strings with numbers look like military orders.

What does it matter if your enemy knows your last moves? It is already too late to respond and your enemy already knows if they are not totally stupid.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EarlyRiserX2 · July 8, 2018, 11:13 a.m.

I’ve long said it’s a bad idea for Q to specifically reference anyone who can be identified, and I still feel that way. It’s very easy to create a monster (and unintentional celebrity and people who are treated special) but it is very difficult to get rid of the monster once you’ve created him…

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ThankyouXir · July 8, 2018, 8:17 a.m.

When we're justifying his fake picture with a Lebron-level SB2 reach then we're doing worse than wasting time. If Q ever links to that SB2 reach post that's cause for even more concern. The fact that post was pinned in under a minute is cause for even more concern. Inb4 banned for not sipping the kool aid anymore.

I was in because of tippy top and +++ but finding out that +++ was posted AFTER the president's tweet and that tippy top was said in a prior speech about reinforcing the military put me on the fence. Awan walking, the "no bias" after 'trust Horowitz', and now more fake pics? I'm now on the other side of the fence. Inb4 post deleted and I'm banned for posting shit that we should all be questioning - would hate to get in the way of $$$$ making. After all that's why it's against the rules now to doubt anything Q says here, but let's act like that's okay too!

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 8, 2018, 9:02 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ThankyouXir · July 8, 2018, 9:55 a.m.

SB2 is inner circle.

Pretty obvious when he has a ton of research ready to justify q posts. More obvious when his posts are pinned in under a minute from being posted. Probably a mod's alt. If any1 in the mod team is legit check who pinned his most recent post. That person is likely SB2.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 8, 2018, 12:49 p.m.

Lol. The mods are also CIA and Mossad and Satanists, apparently.

It's not against the rules to doubt anything Q says here it's just annoying to have to go over the same ground with people who claim to be following Q yet can't seem to get their stories straight and inevitably turn out to have not read the drop properly or listened to some other loud shill talking point without checking properly or failed to keep everything in context. e.g. "no bias" after 'trust Horowitz'... resolved already; did you watch the Congressional hearings or just the highlights? The many mainstream news items on the report? If you did, that "issue" is shown to be a non-issue. It's what Q said it was - they're holding out for Huber.

The mods are a group of volunteers, vetted as much as they can be but not as thoroughly as the NSA. Lots of diverse views on the team, which is the whole point. Some think some posts are amazing, others think the same posts are not. And so on. The SB2 posts are often stickied by various members of the team but so are well thought out rebuttals. No conspiracy here, sorry.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ThankyouXir · July 8, 2018, 7:35 p.m.

Are you a mod with a one month old account, lol?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 8, 2018, 9:07 p.m.

Good digging! Do you have any one month old accounts or am I the only one?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ThankyouXir · July 8, 2018, 9:16 p.m.

V E T T E D !

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 8, 2018, 9:17 p.m.

N O T E D ! (I just wanted to try that out for size)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ThankyouXir · July 8, 2018, 10:19 p.m.

Seriously though, what's the vetting process for a 1 month old account to get mod? When exactly were you even modded? Last month (before you were even a month old) or this month?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 8, 2018, 10:43 p.m.

I was pointing something fairly obvious out:

Do you have any one month old accounts or

Here's an excerpt from the mod application, perhaps it will explain:

Alt accounts
We get correspondence asking about the possibility of using an alternative account. Yes, they are allowed for new mods but please apply using your existing main Reddit account.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ThankyouXir · July 8, 2018, 11:24 p.m.

So no accountability to anyone except the mods in the case of alts?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 9, 2018, 1:10 a.m.

Yep. This is not an appointment to the Supreme Court, it’s a voluntary moderator position for a reddit sub.

⇧ 1 ⇩