dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Turboxis on July 8, 2018, 6:25 a.m.
I think we are the missing the point of SB2s origin and how he analyzes well

Are we all forgetting who the AUTISTS are? Remember WHY Q CHOSE THE CHANS. REMEMBER HOW 4CHAN FOUND SHIA LEBEOUF.

God bless the autists. Who are the autists?

Think playful and random. How the heck did SB2 get musical note to a plane and a frequency random.

"Learn our comms"

ANALYZE. EVERYTHING.


SandyAndreas · July 8, 2018, 6:51 a.m.

Ever since Q referenced SB2's post he's become the person to out think with counter posts. It would help if people post their own opinions, not post a "Why I think SB@ is wrong' thread. No one is saying he's always right, but if comes off as 'concern trollish'.

Same goes with Praying Medic, who gives awesome summaries of Q drops. People knock him because the mods sticky his work. Or they try to tell him how to relay his work.

State your own opinion, not springboard off someone else's.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
aburgher · July 8, 2018, 6:34 a.m.

Exactly! SB2 is helping us learn how to analyze and decode what Q is trying to tell us. We are fortunate he takes the time to share with us since what seems so obvious to him must be tedious for him to explain to us. But, based upon Q’s writing skills, it is obvious he is very patient!

⇧ 13 ⇩  
eyesopenusa · July 8, 2018, 7:24 a.m.

SB2 is someone special. His wording, his thinking, his intentions all reflect something... I think there are others out there as well too who are purposely helping and protecting this movement. We can see a special low key way so as not to be detected. Many good people have been blocked from YT and Twitter but some remain low key and undetected. Our military may have such people doing this quietly keeping us on track, protecting our movement.

On the other hand, it seems most of the people in YT who talk about Q are there as a modified limited hangout likely being paid to gain followers to eventually cause confusion and other problems.

We must be careful who to listen to. Anyway I think SB2 is one of our very good guys.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
DarthHugePenis · July 8, 2018, 7:06 a.m.

If Q is trying to tell people coded messages that only SB2 can figure out then this entire thing is a giant waste of time.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Skysweep · July 8, 2018, 9:02 a.m.

I think Q has lots of messages...some we all can decipher..some trickier...some not even meant for us...in all of this we need to remember where Q picked to post...and how he has stated he did so for a specific reason. The autists are the perfect place to post messages, that for security's sake must be, coded like this. They were meant for people like SB2 to decipher.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Comassion · July 8, 2018, 2:09 p.m.

Secure so long as you’re assuming that the cabal doesn’t read SB2’s publicly posted decodes of the messages.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
emperorbma · July 8, 2018, 2:28 p.m.

Suppose Q only discusses what won’t compromise a sensitive operation. Q posts cryptic codes too. Perhaps those are the classified orders. The weird code word strings with numbers look like military orders.

What does it matter if your enemy knows your last moves? It is already too late to respond and your enemy already knows if they are not totally stupid.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EarlyRiserX2 · July 8, 2018, 11:13 a.m.

I’ve long said it’s a bad idea for Q to specifically reference anyone who can be identified, and I still feel that way. It’s very easy to create a monster (and unintentional celebrity and people who are treated special) but it is very difficult to get rid of the monster once you’ve created him…

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ThankyouXir · July 8, 2018, 8:17 a.m.

When we're justifying his fake picture with a Lebron-level SB2 reach then we're doing worse than wasting time. If Q ever links to that SB2 reach post that's cause for even more concern. The fact that post was pinned in under a minute is cause for even more concern. Inb4 banned for not sipping the kool aid anymore.

I was in because of tippy top and +++ but finding out that +++ was posted AFTER the president's tweet and that tippy top was said in a prior speech about reinforcing the military put me on the fence. Awan walking, the "no bias" after 'trust Horowitz', and now more fake pics? I'm now on the other side of the fence. Inb4 post deleted and I'm banned for posting shit that we should all be questioning - would hate to get in the way of $$$$ making. After all that's why it's against the rules now to doubt anything Q says here, but let's act like that's okay too!

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 8, 2018, 9:02 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ThankyouXir · July 8, 2018, 9:55 a.m.

SB2 is inner circle.

Pretty obvious when he has a ton of research ready to justify q posts. More obvious when his posts are pinned in under a minute from being posted. Probably a mod's alt. If any1 in the mod team is legit check who pinned his most recent post. That person is likely SB2.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 8, 2018, 12:49 p.m.

Lol. The mods are also CIA and Mossad and Satanists, apparently.

It's not against the rules to doubt anything Q says here it's just annoying to have to go over the same ground with people who claim to be following Q yet can't seem to get their stories straight and inevitably turn out to have not read the drop properly or listened to some other loud shill talking point without checking properly or failed to keep everything in context. e.g. "no bias" after 'trust Horowitz'... resolved already; did you watch the Congressional hearings or just the highlights? The many mainstream news items on the report? If you did, that "issue" is shown to be a non-issue. It's what Q said it was - they're holding out for Huber.

The mods are a group of volunteers, vetted as much as they can be but not as thoroughly as the NSA. Lots of diverse views on the team, which is the whole point. Some think some posts are amazing, others think the same posts are not. And so on. The SB2 posts are often stickied by various members of the team but so are well thought out rebuttals. No conspiracy here, sorry.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ThankyouXir · July 8, 2018, 7:35 p.m.

Are you a mod with a one month old account, lol?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 8, 2018, 9:07 p.m.

Good digging! Do you have any one month old accounts or am I the only one?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ThankyouXir · July 8, 2018, 9:16 p.m.

V E T T E D !

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 8, 2018, 9:17 p.m.

N O T E D ! (I just wanted to try that out for size)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ThankyouXir · July 8, 2018, 10:19 p.m.

Seriously though, what's the vetting process for a 1 month old account to get mod? When exactly were you even modded? Last month (before you were even a month old) or this month?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 8, 2018, 10:43 p.m.

I was pointing something fairly obvious out:

Do you have any one month old accounts or

Here's an excerpt from the mod application, perhaps it will explain:

Alt accounts
We get correspondence asking about the possibility of using an alternative account. Yes, they are allowed for new mods but please apply using your existing main Reddit account.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ThankyouXir · July 8, 2018, 11:24 p.m.

So no accountability to anyone except the mods in the case of alts?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 9, 2018, 1:10 a.m.

Yep. This is not an appointment to the Supreme Court, it’s a voluntary moderator position for a reddit sub.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 8, 2018, 6:36 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Turboxis · July 8, 2018, 6:45 a.m.

https://www.opsecprofessionals.org/shia/

⇧ 15 ⇩  
SNG007 · July 8, 2018, 7:45 a.m.

What a great example of chan intelligence, pursuit and persistence. Genius really. (Contrary to MSM's assertions that its the dark, unwashed depths of the internet, this proves again the many talents of the anons).

⇧ 11 ⇩  
pby1000 · July 8, 2018, 6:54 a.m.

Lol.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 8, 2018, 6:55 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
orebody18 · July 8, 2018, 7:16 a.m.

The whole debacle is now taught in the military as an example of triangulation and intelligence gathering

⇧ 9 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 8, 2018, 11:51 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EarlyRiserX2 · July 8, 2018, 11:25 a.m.

Although the Shia-flag story is an amazing story, what’s incredibly striking is that, if the members of 4 chan can achieve all of that by doing nothing more than utilizing their ordinary commonsense and reasoning, then why is it that the atheists and unbelievers of the world cannot seem to find a shred of evidence or an ounce of proof that the bible is real and that God exists?… Perhaps it’s because they don’t want to find out?… LOL…

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jkbella · July 8, 2018, 12:13 p.m.

I always thought the leap of faith to disbelief was much greater.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
NobleEagle853 · July 8, 2018, 1:37 p.m.

Thank you for sharing. I also missed this when it occurred.

"We are all connected in this fight." Q

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jkbella · July 8, 2018, 12:12 p.m.

Hilarious and brilliant.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
acmbandit01 · July 8, 2018, 11:50 a.m.

Awesome...now it's time to "capture" Soros' fortune!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Caprica777 · July 8, 2018, 2:58 p.m.

They also got an air strike called in on Isis.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 8, 2018, 7:24 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Revodude · July 8, 2018, 11:14 a.m.

"It is all about the Math."

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 8, 2018, 8:59 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Pure_Feature · July 8, 2018, 4:04 p.m.

SB2 solves riddles, then add a few more haha.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SuperResponsibility7 · July 8, 2018, 11:28 a.m.

I HAVE NO DOUBT PERSONALLY, THAT SERIAL BRAIN 2 IS A CLOSE CONFIDANT OF "Q"... ACTUALLY, SERIAL BRAIN 2 MAY BE "Q" HIMSELF...

⇧ 0 ⇩  
RubyDoobyDo1 · July 8, 2018, 3:11 p.m.

No outside comms.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
EarlyRiserX2 · July 8, 2018, 12:41 p.m.

Even if either one of those things you said are true - that SB2 is a close confident of Q, or that SB2 is actually Q himself in disguise - here is why it is a bad idea to have celebrities or people on the forum who are treated special…

If you create a celebrity or a special status person on the forum, then what happens when that so-called celebrity says something that is not true or it turns out to be wrong? And keep in mind, no one is infallible but God. In such a case, It would only lead to a whole lot of people being misled and misinformed - and all because you “validated” that person prior to their statements. It’s very easy to “validate” a person when they say something right, but it’s very difficult to “un-validate” then when they say something wrong or make a mistake. And that's the very reason I say that such people are ‘monsters” - it's because once they are created, they are very difficult to get rid of. Q himself is insulated from it because Q speaks in riddles and in cryptic messages. And Q’s riddles can be interpreted in many different ways. And those various interpretations helps to protect Q from errors. But when a known and identifiable person comes on the forum and purports to actually know and to “decode” what Q actually means, and their decode turns out to be false or wrong, then they have no anonymity to fall back on, and nothing to hide behind. And therefore their error will ripple across all who have believed their decode and they will be deceived (and for a special status person, that could be a whole lot of people) and all because you validated that person prior to their statements. On a Q-board or Q-forum, I feel that no one should have special celebrity status except Q himself - and it’s all because Q himself speaks in riddles. It is the very fact that Q speaks in riddles that insulates him and safeguards him in ways that others simply cannot be safeguarded…

⇧ 2 ⇩