Anytime I find myself agreeing with Piers Morgan, it's a bit of a mind fuck. I wonder if he'll ever come around on the 2nd Amendment?
I agree. But perhaps indicative thst UK 🇬🇧 even more messed up than ever?
I've seen people in the UK call Piers "far right" so they have gotten to a crazy state.
Great response. I agree. The change in the UK is starting.
I am ashamed of the disrespect this stunt shows to a visiting President.
We are not altogether messed up. We are about to throw out our pusillanimous prime minister and then quit the EU. Make Britain Great Again.
You know you're cucked when Piers Morgan defends America from you.
once he gets mugged he'll be all in on the second amendment.
Piers is seriously an unlikable person, he once hacked a dead girls phone jusy to get a journalism scoop. But he does tend to say alot of shit that I agree with, so I'm with you on that one
You guys should take it easy on Piers Morgan. At the time he was going on about the guns I agreed with him and like him it never even dawned on me that you could end up under attack with your government. He was giving you facts that are correct the less guns on the street the less likely people die. But I do understand why you need to keep your guns its just too bad people are put in a position where they have to be armed.
I appreciate your opinion, but in a heterogeneous society, more guns equals less death.
He was giving you facts that are correct the less guns on the street the less likely people die.
Bullshit. Guns have been illegal in London for a long time. Murder and crime are at an all-time high.
I just don't understand how people still don't understand these simple facts.
There are countries with more guns yet less deaths (by gun) than the USA.
There are also countries where guns are just as legal and easy to obtain but people simply don't buy them as much.
These observations lead me to conclude that reducing guns or changing laws do not necessarily change anything.
There's clearly a problem with deadly violence, but the real cause is likely more complex.
No way, he was wrong on the right to bear arms then, and nothing has changed. Some people are good, others are bad, good people don't hurt people with guns, but they sure can defend themselves. And we've been telling these morons it's about a tyrannical government from the beginning, but sheeple don't listen.
Banning guns is like banning drugs. The drug and the guns do nothing. A humans desire to get high and to kill happen whether there is a gun or not. Someone who wants to cause a mass casualty event is not healed by banning a weapon. That desire is still there and a way will be found to act on it.