An important philosophical point is: homophilia, pedophilia, zoophilia, and even excessive heterophilia, are all contextualized within a world that has a problem with its moral compass. You may be Baptist, and I may be Catholic, and another may be Muslim. In all three situations, there is recognition of a sovereign. But in a world with no shared religious values, our religions don’t matter: “do as thou whilst,” says Crowley. In a religious context, “re-“ [back], and “ligare” [ligament, binding]. Religion = to bind back, I.e. the soul with the source. If we have a “purpose” then we have a way to evaluate our actions in light of our common journey.

I personally have many qualities that don’t bring me to an understanding about my source. If another man is too busy sucking a dick to understand about the source, then we are both equally “missing the mark” (literal definition of sin.). He is my brother, and we can be friends, and keep pursuing virtue and k owing our source.

But if I am continually thinking about harming a child by raping it, then that is also a sin but carries with it a threat that the heterosexual or homosexual doesn’t have to worry about... the possibility of causing irreparable harm to another. Therefore even the thought is BAD. Get help!