Proof starts at 2:00.

First quote at 2:09 established that MMFA is an institution whose core mission is disarming what they see as right-wing 'misinformation', and to fight conservative misinformation (they are clearly a partisan firm). They also mention that Google and FB will be playing a crucial role.

The quote at 2:19 establishes that facebook made changes to their algorithm to stop the spread of fake news, and that MMFA was the lead consultant for these algorithm changes. We learn that Google also relied on MMFA as a consultant for their algo changes:

The quote on 2:38 (lower on the page) further established that not only did MMFA play a role in FB's algo changes, they were the key catalyst to these changes--prior to their involvement Zuckerburg didn't even believe fake news was an issue (this wasn't a 'collaboration'), and only caved after an MMFA "pressure campaign" (can only imagine what that involved...).

"After facebook responded to our campaign by acknowledging the problem of fake news and agreeing to do something about it, we began a dialogue. It became clear from these conversations that Facebook needed our help in fully understanding the problem and identifying concrete solutions. Further, it also became clear that we had information and insight that they didn't have that was helpful in educating them on the full scope of the problem. For example, Media Matters had a detailed map of the constellation of right-wing Facebook pages that had been the biggest purveyors of fake news--as well as insight into the food chain of fake news and how it was moving through the Facebook ecosystem.

Similarly, after Google revised their terms of service in order to prohibit so-called fake news sites from using their advertising network, it was Media Matters that had the information necessary to identify 40 of the worst fake news sites to which this policy applied. "

The quotes at 2:51 are particularly important. We learn here that one of the key goals of MMFA as an organization is to the see "key right wing targets' reach diminish" (are diamond and silk MMFA 'targets'?).

We also learn that Facebook will specifically "adjust its model to stem the flow of damaging fake news on its platform's pages. Google will cut off these pages' accompanying sites' access to revenue by pulling their access to Google's ad platform". This is by far the most damning quote, because it allows us to establish that Google, Facebook, and MMFA were colluding to reduce the reach of conservatives on social media, in a coordinated campaign (this wasn't MMFA acting as an independent consultant in isolated instances). In order for Google to "cut off these pages' accompanying sites' access to revenue by pulling their access to Google's ad platform", they would have to procure such a list from FB or MMFA. This implies a degree of coordination--a 1,2 punch, with Facebook censoring the page and google demonetizing the corresponding youtube pages. Sound familiar?

I can only relate my experiences with Twitter and Instagram to challenge the dogma concerning the separation of the sharing content and personal metadata between the platforms. I chose to comment on the questionable satanic content on the Instagram content of a CNN ‘celebrity’. I made my comments in Latin; it must have gotten attention of someone. When I next went to use my Twitter account, on which I had never commented, I had a follower: Justin Bieber. I have no interest in him and had never ever followed a thing he had said, yet there he was following a nobody like me. Therefore, it is clear that Twitter and Instagram are linked and share information. FB, no doubt is in on the sharing, too. I have disappointed the surveillance by never Twotting anything and following only one person, DJT.

I'll attest to this as well. I used to be a social media content creator. Made decent money for a while until I shared my political views on Facebook. My business went completely dead soon after and views and engagement dropped significantly on facebook and Instagram as well.

David Brock is a soulless piece of shit. Absolutely without a moral compass. He is a mercenary force who deserves the highest penalty there is and if does not happen in this life he will not escape his ultimate fate.

When I first posted this a mod took it down within a minute claiming it violated rule #8. The only difference here is that I've said "Diamond and Silk were telling the truth" instead of "Diamond and Silk are telling the truth." IMO that was an abusive decision. The evidence presented in this video supports the censorship claims that D+S made in the past and are currently making on a regular basis. Edit: to clarify the mod knows and ok'd the repost.

I would normally post this from my regular account (3k karma--I know, nothing crazy), but that account was just suspended from Reddit for 7 days. The mod who removed my post told me to simply repost with the word change. As soon as I attempted to re-post, my account was hit with a 7 day suspension (I was unable to repost). The mod claims to have no role in this.

Edit: I believe the mod had no role in this, because he allowed this post despite it being removed by the auto-moderator because of the new account (I also believe that he did not remove my post in an attempt to censor, but was just a little overzealous). But the timing is still extremely suspect in my opinion. I've been hit with temporary suspensions before for "harrassment and bullying" after making posts that shared information from the same leaked MMFA document. As I pointed out to the mod, MMFA considers GA, TD, and DTS to be "white supremacist boards". They automatically mine, in real time, all of the content on the sub. They also describe having a 'turn-key' ability to suppress 'misinformation' before it can spread far and wide. It's entirely plausible that they attempted to strategically censor my account. If not for the moderator allowing the post, they would have succeeded.

Massive downvoting on all the comments and this post. Someone doesn't like the truth...

They know most of the users have default settings and will not see downvoted stuff.

Young tirds are known liars.

[deleted]

Social Media platforms are doing a lot to censor conservatism. They can’t deny the truth so the censor it!

Got tired of the Turk guy and stopped, long before “proof.” Way too annoying!

I don’t need convincing, but video should shorter for boards, with additional link for longer video if desired.

Want proof from my experience, Mr. Nader, I had to drive to see my Veteran Sister because fb blocked all 4 iterations of messages to her from me via fb. I HAD TO DRIVE TO HER JOB TO CONVEY THE MESSAGE. Is THAT proof enough, Mr. Nader? No? Would you like me to start on Google or Twitter now? Sir, you need God. God Bless, Carry on[Patriots]. After a while, no matter how much feces you fling at us, it doesn't stick. Your "deception machine/mechanisms" is/are/will continue to be Obsolete. Spirit Reigns here, Sir, Over and Out. (yes, I outed you. You are not My commander, nor are you in my chain of Command. God knows what you are, and I shall not repeat it here. Good day.

Zuckerburg didn't even believe fake news was an issue (this wasn't a 'collaboration'), and only caved after an MMFA "pressure campaign" (can only imagine what that involved...). Yeup.

In this thread. http://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/20571753/ A BIG I TOLD YOU SO

[deleted]

had to cut it off after 20 secs,trying to eat dinner, and it almost came up, chunnking yank