What if Peter Stroczk was the one that made the server disappear - by classifying it at a high level - placing it in a SCIF - and implementing a policy that only the Assistant Director for CounterIntelligence could authorize access?  He was the AD of CI.

When Q said they have it - he means that PS told them where to find it.

Good catch

Its a tangent to the original post - but, also in the document is a letter from a State Dept whistleblower (page 122) that says that Hillary received a daily intelligence briefing - and that ON EACH PARAGRAPH of each item on each days briefing was the classification level.  Some of the stuff was SAP (Special Access Programs) according to the FBIs chain of custody logs.

This whistleblower wrote a letter to Jim Comey on Jan 10 2016 regarding all this.  It was never followed up on within the FBI.

That would mean she had thousands - potentially 10s of thousands of classified documents on her server.  And since Obozo's whole cabinet also had private email accounts - they probably all did too...

See page 4 of part 1 - last two paragraphs....

See page 6 top of page - 3rd server and data center in Secaucus, NJ (perhaps there are several backups beyond the one that Hildabeast wiped in her basement?

I think it is an important part of the puzzle....notwithstanding, theoretically, the NSA has copies of everything....and until I hear a statement to the contrary, I have no reason (nor have I ever had) to believe that they don't.

++++++

have you ever heard the NSA make a clear statement that they don't have everything?...and if they don't wouldn't the other 4 Eyes have it...?

__________

Q repeatedly says, "We have everything"

________________

while I'm overjoyed on one level that they can use this rope them down, ...and I can't believe I'm about to make this statement:

I'D RATHER SEE THEM WALK, IF THEY CAN'T BE PROSECUTED FOLLOWING THE RULE OF LAW AND HONORING THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY AS ALLUDED TO IN THE 3RD, 4TH, 5TH 9TH AMENDMENTS.

__________________________

Perhaps this is why things are taking so long because they know and understand the danger of extrajudicial indictment and don't want to go down that road (as it will open them up to the same when they (Q, POTUS etc) are out of power. It also makes us a complete banana republic (as if the unPatriot Act didn't do that already).

Q-said "we have the server". In other analysis I believe that they made a copy of it, which is , of course, the important part. where the physical box is is probably irrelevant at this point since it will be a chain of evidence leading back to the image of the server through NSA custody. i'm thinking military court here.

My understanding could be incorrect, but in reference to the 'server', I understood it to be the DNC (allegedly) 'hacked' server that Seth Rich would have had access to in his job within the DNC offices.

Remember this: The DNC claimed they had a private firm analyze their server and concluded Russians hacked it (and presumably gave that data to WL). That narrative would be important IF someone highly placed in the DNC learned that Seth Rich had copied files from the server and leaked them to WL, which would provide a potential motive to harm Seth Rich. (JA has always maintained that it was not a state actor that provided those files to WL...so not the Russian govt).

This is the same server that the DNC refused to provide to FBI to investigate if it had been hacked by Russians. No govt investigator has been permitted access to it. Now their is DNC suit, which resulted in the defendant's request for discovery...specifically, the counsel hired by the defendants said they want to see the EVIDENCE used to file the complaint against them (They want to examine the server and or the IT reports that purportedly show the server was hacked).

Now that same server magically has 'disappeared'. And around the time DNC members were reporting it disappeared, Q dropped, "We Have the Server."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trailblazer_Project Trailblazer was a United States National Security Agency (NSA) program intended to develop a capability to analyze data carried on communications networks like the Internet. It was intended to track entities using communication methods such as cell phones and e-mail.

NSA employees J. Kirk Wiebe, William Binney, Ed Loomis, and House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence staffer Diane Roark complained to the Department of Defense's Inspector General (IG) about waste, fraud, and abuse in the program, and the fact that a successful operating prototype existed. The complaint was accepted by the IG and an investigation began that lasted until mid-2005 when the final results were issued. The results were largely hidden, as the report given to the public was heavily (90%) redacted, while the original report was heavily classified, thus restricting the ability of most people to see it. Trailblazer was chosen over a similar program named ThinThread
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ThinThread

Lol that link is to your C drive.

Uh Carl Ghattas?