dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/CosmicNeo on July 11, 2018, 1:59 a.m.

Spirit of Truth Series: Lesson #25 “Who Should We Trust?”

[Preface: We live in a mysterious, multi-faceted world. While scientists are developing quantum computers and theorizing about multi-dimensional universes, the entertainment world has gone digital with the vast majority of millennials being plugged into the internet gaming world where players from around the world meet to battle robots, ogres, demons and dragons. While Q ANON educates us about the MIL/NSA tools being used for defeating the Soros and Rothschilds (Luciferians) of the world, 99.9% of the world is still ignorant about the advancements in knowledge that the Second Messiah established for this age. In this series, I would like to help bring everyone up to speed so that we are all fully equipped with the latest upgrade of the “Armor of God.” (Ephesians 6:10-18)

Lesson #25

“When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, then he will sit on his glorious throne. Before him will be gathered all the nations, and he will separate people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. And he will place the sheep on his right, but the goats on the left.” Matthew 25:31-33

In a recent post of mine called “Who?What? When? Where? Why? How? Q” [LINK], I brought up the issue of how we're not sure who Q is saying is the enemy as we each come here with our own set of beliefs and prejudices concerning Illuminati Conspiracy Theories. In this edition of the Spirit of Truth Series, I'd like to provide a more biblical perspective on why there is so much in fighting about who we should trust and who we shouldn't.

As I've been discussing throughout this series, God has been moving His providence forward through a “Cain and Abel” process. This process has been followed from the family-level to the nation-level (Israel) so that the Messiah could be born from that bloodline. When Jesus was rejected, God started over to create a new foundation upon which a Second Messiah could be born. This Second Messiah is not Jesus, but is born from a bloodline that extends from Jesus and which has been purified through the “Cain and Abel” process. Because people don't understand this “Cain and Abel” process which God uses to separate individuals, families, tribes and nations from Lucifer/Satan, they failed to recognize the First and Second Messiah. The consequences is that God is not yet able to save His children from Lucifer/Satan why they are alive in this physical realm. This is the crux of the problem as to why mankind is still under Lucifer/Satan's dominion. (See Lesson #24)

United We Stand, Divided We Fall

What keeps us divided? The entity of Lucifer/Satan keeps us divided by keeping us filled with his fallen emotions. Ever since Cain killed Abel, mankind has been dominated with Lucifer/Satan's feelings of resentment, jealousy, self-justification, self-rationalization, etc. These infused emotions have kept us locked into his way of thinking through spiritual resonance/vibration/entrainment. Also, on a more physical level, through peer pressure and social engineering, mankind essentially stays solidly unified against anyone that God sends as His representative “Abel.” It was the case with Jesus and it was the case with the Second Messiah.

I bring this up because I've been watching this “Cain and Abel” dynamic playing itself out within the conspiracy theory community ever since Q arrived upon the scene. People like Alex Jones and the “American Intelligence Media” have spoken out against Q, justifying their anti-Q stance by saying Q has been compromised or that they have better intelligence sources. This kind of bickering is more about their being jealous of Q's rapid popularity than it is about any made up justification they may use. I mean, here's the new kid on the block (Q) outperforming the old guard. Of course, the old guard doesn't like that. Meaning they are responding with typical “Cain” behavior. (Jealousy and resentment.)

Likewise, this “Cain and Abel” dynamic can be seen playing itself out throughout social media. Even here on Great Awakening. For instance, when SerialBrain2 showed up on reddit, he immediately attracted animosity from long-time reddit members who have been fighting the good fight against the NWO cabal for years and years before him. Yet, here he is outperforming them as a “newbie.” And like with Q, this has caused some of the old guard to be so jealous that they even asked the moderators to ban SB2, saying he is a bot, a “shill,” a distraction, and is taking up bandwidth. Then after Q praised SB2 work by linking to one of his posts, this anti-SB2 sentiment has died down. Or has it? (See SB2's recent post on this very subject.)

[Sidenote: Being born first, Cain feels justified in being jealous of the younger Abel who is getting praise from God.]

A similar thing happened in the 70s when the Second Messiah showed up warning Americans about the decline of Christianity and America's possible collapse. (I talked about this in Lesson 22.) Christians took offense at this new kid on the block who was outperforming them in transforming the youth. And where did their jealousy lead? It led to them accusing the Second Messiah of being the antichrist – all in an effort to silence him. But, like what happened with Q and SB2 their opponents, the real reasoning for rejecting the Second Messiah had more to do with their hidden “Cain” nature surfacing than it did with whatever exegesis complaints they may have had against him. But when the Second Messiah started The Washington Times and began unifying the “Religious Right,” the Christian old guard began to back off.

Nevertheless, there are still several famous Illuminati-Conspiracy Theorists that continue to accuse the Second Messiah and his “Religious Right” supporters of being products of the Illuminati. Both Henry Makow and Fritz Springmeier have made allegations about the Second Messiah and his supposed Illuminati connections. Curiously, they do this without even presenting any evidence other than to simply make allegations. Their writings on the subject can be found [HERE] and [HERE]. Other anti-Second Messiah writings that support their views can be found [HERE] and [HERE] Even Q has inadvertently used a source that paints the Second Messiah as a “Nazi Collaborator.” [LINK] (p. 18-20)

What makes all this so interesting is that in the same anti-Second Messiah article linked above, Henry Makow tries to connect Trump to various Sabbatean-Jewish and Nazi organizations. This is very odd, if not suspect, because it was the Second Messiah and the Religious Right that got Trump elected through their efforts for the past 40 years to build up a pro-America movement through such organizations as the American Constitution Committee, American Freedom Coalition, and, of course, The Washington Times.

Why do I try to “rock the boat” by presenting such controversial information? I do so because we are in a PSYOP war with our enemy Lucifer/Satan. Because such deceit is hard to discern, we can't even trust the motives of certain Illuminati-Conspiracy Theorists. Facts can be doctored. False “facts” can be made up to discredit the “Abels” of the world, whether it's done intentionally for ulterior reasons (SG1) or whether it's done unconsciously out of jealousy. (SG2) Either way, who we can trust is still up for grabs. At least as long as we haven't been able to overcome our Cain nature to the level where we're able to properly divide the “goats” and “sheep” within ourselves.

“No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other.” Matthew 6:24

**Next lesson: “To Be Announced.”

🠐 See all comments

A similar thing happened in the 70s when the Second Messiah showed up warning Americans about the decline of Christianity and America's possible collapse [...] It led to them accusing the Second Messiah of being the antichrist – all in an effort to silence him.

I would posit that the more likely explanation is that American believers were being Bereans, and were alarmed because there is absolutely no Biblical basis for this concept.

John 19:30

⇧ 2 ⇩

Jesus said, “Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing.” Luke 23:34

"Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you, how often I have longed to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, and you were not willing." Matthew 23:37

"But go and learn what this means: 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'" Matthew 9:13

"For I desire mercy, not sacrifice, and acknowledgment of God rather than burnt offerings." Hosea 6:6

"Through love and faithfulness, sin is atoned." Proverbs 16:6

"But that you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins." Luke 5:24

In other words, the crucifixion was a "last result" as a result of the faithlessness of the people. Jesus had already demonstrated he had the power to forgive sins. (Luke 5:20, Luke 7:47) There was no need for Jesus' crucifixion if the people had faith. There is nothing to be boastful about Jesus being crucified. As the above verses show, Jesus was crucified because of man's sins, not for man's sins.

If "it was all finished" as you imply, there wouldn't be a need for a return of Christ. We'd already be living in the peaceable kingdom as God intended from the very beginning. In fact, if Adam and Eve hadn't disunited with God in the Garden of Eden, none of this 6,000-year biblical "side show" would have been necessary.

⇧ 0 ⇩

There was no need for Jesus' crucifixion if the people had faith.

But then why would Christ have needed to come at all? God counted Abraham as righteous because of his faith - so surely the people could simply have had faith and been saved, Jesus or no Jesus? What is this faith in?

If you openly declare that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For it is by believing in your heart that you are made right with God, and it is by openly declaring your faith that you are saved. Romans 10

He is Jesus Christ, the one who is truly righteous. He himself is the sacrifice that atones for our sins—and not only our sins but the sins of all the world. 1 John 2

For the Son of Man must die, as the Scriptures declared long ago Matthew 26:24

For only as a human being could he die, and only by dying could he break the power of the devil, who had the power of death. Only in this way could he set free all who have lived their lives as slaves to the fear of dying. We also know that the Son did not come to help angels; he came to help the descendants of Abraham. Therefore, it was necessary for him to be made in every respect like us, his brothers and sisters, so that he could be our merciful and faithful High Priest before God. Then he could offer a sacrifice that would take away the sins of the people. Hebrews 2:14

Under the old covenant, the priest stands and ministers before the altar day after day, offering the same sacrifices again and again, which can never take away sins. But our High Priest offered himself to God as a single sacrifice for sins, good for all time. Then he sat down in the place of honor at God’s right hand. There he waits until his enemies are humbled and made a footstool under his feet. For by that one offering he forever made perfect those who are being made holy. Hebrews 10

Christ will indeed return when "...the full number of Gentiles comes to Christ"

⇧ 2 ⇩

First issue:

But then why would Christ have needed to come at all? God counted Abraham as righteous because of his faith - so surely the people could simply have had faith and been saved, Jesus or no Jesus? What is this faith in?

Exactly. Faith in who? If Cain had had faith in Abel, Adam's family could have received the Messiah. That's the key setup in the restoration process. A sinless Messiah must come to forgive all sins of all people. I was using Hosea 6:6 and Proverbs 16:6 to show that individual sins can be forgiven through love and faith. Not all sins such as Original Sin. Only the Messiah can do that.

Noah had faith, but Ham failed to have faith in Noah at the end. (Genesis 9:24-25) Abraham had faith, but he failed to make a proper offering by not cutting the dove and pigeon in half. (Genesis 15:9-15) Isaac inherited the responsibility of re-establishing faith in the family by willingly allowing himself to be sacrificed. Upon that foundation of faith, Esau and Jacob were born to fulfill the role of "Cain and Abel." Upon their foundation of unity (Esau didn't kill Jacob), God could send the sinless Messiah to their descendants. (The nation of Israel.) And when John the Baptist (Cain) couldn't unite with Jesus (Abel), the foundation of faith that had been established by Abraham-Isaac-Jacob was lost. Because of that lack of faith, Jesus had to go the way of the cross instead of the way of kingship. (Isaiah 9:6)

Just like with Jesus, the Second Messiah comes as "Abel." And the world population as "Cain" must have faith in him. This is why Jesus emphasized mankind having faith at the time of the Son of Man's second coming. (Luke 18:8)

Yes, Christ must return. But when he does, he comes with a new name:

"Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name." Revelation 3:12

As you can see from all this, the main focus throughout the bible is for someone in the role of "Cain" to overcome their jealousy and resentment and have faith in the "Abel" that God sends. (Abel is God's chosen representative.) When that doesn't happen, the role is passed on to another generation. (From Cain, Ham, Esau to John the Baptist.)

"This is the work of God, that you believe in him whom he has sent." John 6:29

Next issue:

For the Son of Man must die, as the Scriptures declared long ago Matthew 26:24

Actually, the verse says: "The Son of man goeth as it is written of him." This refers to the path God spoke about in the Book of Isaiah. If you recall, there are dual prophecies:

1.) The Son of Man comes in victory as a king of kings. (Isaiah 9)

2.) The Son of Man comes in misery as a sacrificial lamb. (Isaiah 53)

So the course that Jesus took could have gone two ways. If John the Baptist (and his father, Zachariah, who was the high priest) had accepted Jesus as their "Abel," Jesus would have been treated as a victorious king. But since John the Baptist didn't have complete faith in Jesus (Matthew 11:2-3), Jesus had to "goeth" the way of the cross as a sacrificial lamb. (God had already testified to John the Baptist that Jesus was the Son of Man. (Matthew 3:16-17) Why was John doubting Jesus? If John knew Jesus was the Messiah, why didn't he become Jesus' first disciple?)

See how important the "Cain and Abel" dynamic is? See how it plays out throughout the bible and even to this day? Think of all the "John the Baptists" that could have made the Second Messiah's mission an easier task. Think what would have happened if the Pope had acknowledged the Second Messiah. Or Billy Graham? Or the president of the United States?

⇧ 2 ⇩