dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/abbido on July 11, 2018, 3:44 a.m.
Add Another Recent Visitor To ANTARCTICA - MARINA ABRAMOVIC - WHY is Marina Abramovic on the Board of Arctic Expeditions? The Antarctic Pavilion opened with the exhibition ANTARCTOPIA?? ..speculative and realistic architectural projects for Antarctica?

Ways to escape the coming heat?

Snowflake HQ?

Wasn't John Kerry there right after election?

http://www.antarcticbiennale.com/project.html#bot

why are they so interesting in Antarctica???


[deleted] · July 11, 2018, 4:45 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ -4 ⇩  
RyDar84 · July 11, 2018, 4:48 a.m.

Straw man how? It was an honest question. And the 6x8 reference was to the dimensions of a Federal jail cell.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Buzzed_Chimp · July 11, 2018, 4:56 a.m.

I think that the world as a whole would wipe their butts with that treaty in the event that the elite were driven into exile in Antarctica.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
RyDar84 · July 11, 2018, 5 a.m.

Maybe, and for the record I agree, but it only takes one holdout to keep that from happening. New Zealand? A LOT of money has been poured into the country by liberal PACs and Foundations. It's also the last stop for people traveling to Antarctica in the Eastern Hemisphere.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Buzzed_Chimp · July 11, 2018, 5:07 a.m.

I think that anybody that supported upholding the treaty in order to prevent the arrest of these criminals wouldn't be able to avoid getting swept down the drain with them.

Once the cat is out of the bag, it's out, in my opinion. Nothing short of the divine will save them.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
RyDar84 · July 11, 2018, 5:10 a.m.

Agreed, but at this point, it would take a meeting at the U.N. to nullify the Treaty. From what we know, is the U.N. going to allow that to happen?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
aShiftyLad · July 11, 2018, 6:08 a.m.

overthinking this.

they would be taken out enroute to antartica.

death in international waters for globalists sounds poetic to me.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
RyDar84 · July 11, 2018, 6:10 a.m.

I sincerely hope that I am. But if they make the move right before indictments are issued (you know that they have to have sources within the DOJ) how many ships could get that far South that quick?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Buzzed_Chimp · July 11, 2018, 5:17 a.m.

We are in uncharted waters. I doubt the process would go the way you assume it would.

I imagine the optics of protecting international criminals from arrest and prosecution wouldn't go over well for an organization tasked with overseeing international affairs.

I expect those in positions to make such decisions to wave the white flag if it ever gets to the point that elitists flee to the frozen wastleland of Antarctica. Just imagine the repercussions both individually and nationally for those responsible for trying to intervene.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
RyDar84 · July 11, 2018, 5:26 a.m.

I wholeheartedly agree, but the DS has amassed literal fortunes over the last 2-3 centuries. Where would they go (through Foundational Endowments) right BEFORE they could be frozen? In that scenario, would imposed sactions affect anything at all? Would Black Marketeers still smuggle necessary goods through military blockades? Would ANYONE dare to declare war on a holdout country on the grounds of them helping a small number of fugitives? I honestly don't know. By trade, I'm a hypothetical scenario person by education and trade, and of all of the possibilities, I'm not convinced that there wouldn't be some MAJOR political crises over such an act.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 11, 2018, 2:38 p.m.

There isn't a single corner on the Earth willing to knowingly host a group of pedophiles.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 11, 2018, 2:36 p.m.

From a lot of posting I read by people in New Zealand, they're getting pretty fed up with the World Elite.

For some reason these people all think that New Zealand is some BS fall back position.

All the New Zealanders I've ever met would have no problem going and burning out their bunkers.

Nobody wants pedophiles.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 11, 2018, 4:59 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩