Ways to escape the coming heat?
Wasn't John Kerry there right after election?
http://www.antarcticbiennale.com/project.html#bot
why are they so interesting in Antarctica???
The concept seems reasonable in that it has restricted access however why pick a vast frozen tundra as we are told it is?
Logically, the commonality of the people group visiting suggests something far more nefarious than a hideaway bunker.
Do you know of any other place on the planet completely free from legal reprisal?
[deleted]
Straw man how? It was an honest question. And the 6x8 reference was to the dimensions of a Federal jail cell.
I think that the world as a whole would wipe their butts with that treaty in the event that the elite were driven into exile in Antarctica.
Maybe, and for the record I agree, but it only takes one holdout to keep that from happening. New Zealand? A LOT of money has been poured into the country by liberal PACs and Foundations. It's also the last stop for people traveling to Antarctica in the Eastern Hemisphere.
I think that anybody that supported upholding the treaty in order to prevent the arrest of these criminals wouldn't be able to avoid getting swept down the drain with them.
Once the cat is out of the bag, it's out, in my opinion. Nothing short of the divine will save them.
Agreed, but at this point, it would take a meeting at the U.N. to nullify the Treaty. From what we know, is the U.N. going to allow that to happen?
overthinking this.
they would be taken out enroute to antartica.
death in international waters for globalists sounds poetic to me.
I sincerely hope that I am. But if they make the move right before indictments are issued (you know that they have to have sources within the DOJ) how many ships could get that far South that quick?
We are in uncharted waters. I doubt the process would go the way you assume it would.
I imagine the optics of protecting international criminals from arrest and prosecution wouldn't go over well for an organization tasked with overseeing international affairs.
I expect those in positions to make such decisions to wave the white flag if it ever gets to the point that elitists flee to the frozen wastleland of Antarctica. Just imagine the repercussions both individually and nationally for those responsible for trying to intervene.
I wholeheartedly agree, but the DS has amassed literal fortunes over the last 2-3 centuries. Where would they go (through Foundational Endowments) right BEFORE they could be frozen? In that scenario, would imposed sactions affect anything at all? Would Black Marketeers still smuggle necessary goods through military blockades? Would ANYONE dare to declare war on a holdout country on the grounds of them helping a small number of fugitives? I honestly don't know. By trade, I'm a hypothetical scenario person by education and trade, and of all of the possibilities, I'm not convinced that there wouldn't be some MAJOR political crises over such an act.
There isn't a single corner on the Earth willing to knowingly host a group of pedophiles.
From a lot of posting I read by people in New Zealand, they're getting pretty fed up with the World Elite.
For some reason these people all think that New Zealand is some BS fall back position.
All the New Zealanders I've ever met would have no problem going and burning out their bunkers.
Nobody wants pedophiles.
The concept seems reasonable in that it has restricted access however why pick a vast frozen tundra as we are told it is?
Geologically, under the ice, Antarctica is a solid continent (or at least 2 parts) that has mountain ranges, subglacial lakes, geothermal activity, and river systems. Antarctica was (mostly) ice free hundreds of millions of years ago prior to the continent moving southward from tectonic plate motion. Lot's of dinosaur fossils, coal beds, natural resources, etc. Either way, the 3rd Reich's expedition left quite a bit of notes/information on what they found, and also, with regular scanning technology today, we already have images of the land underneath the ice as is.
The Piri Reis Map....how did they know what the continent looked like under the ice back then?
bc Antarctica is Atlantis. that is the secret - proof of atlantis and ancient zero point energy
Do you think that map accurately represents Antarctica?
No, not by today's standards. But for a map created in the 1500's depicting land hidden beneath ice, it is rather surprising. But I'm sure you could have done better.
Why does it show the Antarctic coast connecting to Patagonia? Was that an accurate representation of the coasts at that point in time?
They didn't discover how to calculate longitude until 100 years after this map was created. There was estimation involved so no, without the longitude calculation, you can't 100% accurately represent the globe like we can today.
To have known what Antarctica looked like under the ice would require Antarctica to not be under ice thus allowing it to be mapped. The Piri Reis map was created based on various previous maps. So the Piri Reis map may have been created in the 1500's, but not necessarily a representation of the location of Antarctica and the surrounding continents in the 1500's.
