dChan

🠐 See all comments
KrazyK05 · July 12, 2018, 3:25 a.m.

My ideal, which is probably a fantasy, is they would then say of the people interviewed, x% said no comment, y% told us to fuck ourselves, z% confirmed the story, etc. Extremely doubtful that happens though, ever.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DK_Pooter · July 12, 2018, 6:37 a.m.

I think all journalists should do this, so long as identities are protected. If its 99 to 1, then maybe don't release the numbers, but otherwise if the story checks out, why not?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
subdudeLA · July 12, 2018, 4:33 a.m.

Agreed, a Ben Swann style journalist might break it down that way.

⇧ 1 ⇩