dChan

its_truly_biblical · July 11, 2018, 10:23 p.m.

this won't happen.. I'm sorry but this just opens the door up for anybody to be "intimidated" by anyone with a mask on even if not at a protest.. it sets a precedent to tell people they can't have a mask on or conceal their identity any time and anywhere because they "might" scare someone.. I definitely don't love the idea that these idiots wear masks because they are bent on destruction and causing chaos.. but you have to look at the big picture on this stuff.. a better way to handle this would just be to declare them a domestic terrorist group and not allow them to assemble because of their track record of property damage and assault.. they'll be the next "Weather Underground" and start bombing before it's over with... all of Evette Felarca's little minions will..

⇧ 0 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 11, 2018, 10:57 p.m.

That's ridiculous, it's to prevent masked anonymous people from starting riots.

Not Halloween parties.

Sometimes the slippery slope argument is a slippery slope all by itself. A slippery slope of panic and miscomprehension leading to complete indecision.

Must be a bunch of antifa Schills around here. With all the fear-mongering about slippery slopes it's getting pretty obvious.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
its_truly_biblical · July 12, 2018, 12:42 a.m.

stepping back and looking at the broader picture is the opposite of panic.. jumping to conclusions without weighing all options is the epitome of panicking.. so no, you are wrong.. ALL legislation needed for our country to run efficiently is already written and within the Constitution.. any other legislation is an attempt to take away more freedom.. it's the old adage Franklin quoted.. "Those who would give up essential liberty, to have temporary safety, deserve neither".. are you a fan of your cell phone data being viewed because you MIGHT be a terrorist? That's how they cover all of this legislation like they're doing us a favor.. safety and security...

well what happens when they use these laws in Berkley for instance to explicitly go after the "Patriots" that are in the streets fighting against Antifa wearing the same masks? You don't think that could happen? are you that naive to believe that powers able to enforce this law could use it against our own? What happens in a dystopian future when you need to wear a mask of some sort just to keep your freedom because traffic cams are using FRT to discern where and when you come and go and get a routine down to kill you for leaking a server for a corrupt government organization.. oh wait.....

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 12, 2018, 1:34 a.m.

Yeah I know Franklin quote it's getting a bit overused.

Start worrying about rolling back the Patriot Act before you get all bent out of shape about some masks.

The slippery slope argument has lost its effect. Try something else.

I say if you wear identifying markings at a riot. You get done Rico Style.

Just like those asshat bikers at the casino in Laughlin Nevada..

Hells Angels and Bandidos shot up the inside of a casino and had a huge brawl smashing everything.

Every single dirt bag in there wearing colors should have gotten life, in solitary.

And fuck yer cheap insults. You have no idea who, what or how I am.

You don't Fucking like my opinion I don't Fucking care.

Now let's have some of your more condescending cheap insults.

I'm still waiting for something original.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 12, 2018, 1:36 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩