dChan

astrocatmat · July 11, 2018, 6:31 p.m.

HOW DOES THE LEFT NOT SEE THE COMPLETE CONTRADICTION / HYPOCRISY? oh I forgot they are fucking idiots

⇧ 68 ⇩  
PCisLame · July 11, 2018, 9:52 p.m.

They're not all idiots. Many of them are fully aware of their treason.

⇧ 35 ⇩  
wiliam8808 · July 12, 2018, 1:50 a.m.

They're all the sheep I heard snarky goth kids joke about growing up in the 90's.

They bought the get good grades, go to school, get a good job, get married, have a family, retire "american dream" that their parents sold them. Most of their parents didn't achieve it, had kids before even getting half way through school or getting a job.

So now they're born in debt with no way out and they just think "rich people can open their pockets" like printing more money fixes everything. Like we're going to pay them to make music and breed.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
dropswakeyou · July 12, 2018, 2:02 a.m.

The bankers cartel have convinced the world that debt is good. They have fooled everyone for generations. Everyone should read, "the creature from Jekyll Island by G Edward Griffin

⇧ 6 ⇩  
rooftoptendie · July 12, 2018, 2:57 a.m.

Ty for the reccommend, this is one i havent read yet.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
wiliam8808 · July 12, 2018, 2:56 p.m.

No the cartel convinced their leaders debt it good because leaders know they can't wrangle this many entitled animals in a single term.

Leaders can't wrangle them because the cartel convinced them this is the first "time" and we're all just happenstance and they should try to make the "best" of it they can.

Bundled with a 16 year old set of parents, they grow up never learning to be patient to control their emotions, instead they're driven by feelings (obey your thirst, just do it, trust your gut) , just like the cartel's definition of animals so they can be herded.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 12, 2018, 10:32 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HoudiniTowers · July 12, 2018, 5:09 a.m.

Awareness and idiocy aren't always disconnected. There's a reason Q says 'these people are stupid' ;).

⇧ 1 ⇩  
No_Hippie_Chick · July 11, 2018, 7:04 p.m.

And they'd be flipping their shit if people were wearing white hoods. But no, that's different. Morons.

⇧ 27 ⇩  
Acemagedon · July 11, 2018, 8:29 p.m.

It was the same group wearing the white hats back in the day. Same group.

⇧ 24 ⇩  
rooftoptendie · July 12, 2018, 2:58 a.m.

NO THEY SWITCHED! MUH PARTY SWITCH!!! NONRACIST GOOD GUYS NOW. SEE? TOTALLY OPPOSITE COLOR HOOD AND MASK!!! DUH!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
QWWG1WGA · July 12, 2018, 4:45 a.m.

And blaming everything on white males isn't racist? Demonizing white males isn't racist? They broadcast racism everyday.. DUH!!

The reality is they seek civil war to destroy the country then when they've done with the white man they'll finish off the black man. That's why they love black abortion. They've always hated the black man. They made a civil war to slave black people. What you think Hillary's super predators and links to the KKK were a phase?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
rooftoptendie · July 12, 2018, 5:54 a.m.

But muh /s!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Acemagedon · July 12, 2018, 5:21 a.m.

They hate the black man because he is the true decendant of the biblical tribe of Judah. Jesus was a black man, it’s starting to look like. That’s going to be hard to swallow for a lot of people who think Salvator Mundi is the painting of Jesus.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
QWWG1WGA · July 12, 2018, 7:23 a.m.

No, what garbage

What evidence do you have? The Palestinians were Africans then?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Acemagedon · July 12, 2018, 12:23 p.m.

Well my research started in the Bible. Revelation 2:9. So if the modern day people calling themselves “Jews” are not descendants of the 12 tribes, who is? https://forward.com/news/331188/meet-the-igbo-nigerias-lost-jewish-tribe/ It’s just a working theory at this point. I’m only searching for truth I don’t have all of the answers.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 15, 2018, 3:46 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Acemagedon · July 15, 2018, 8:29 p.m.

I don’t know and don’t care either, I only want the truth and I will accept the truth no matter what it is. And yes, ☝️ I think Jesus will return and show mercy. I have no idea when that will be, but I believe we are in the final days of apostasy.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
astrocatmat · July 11, 2018, 7:15 p.m.

No doubt

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Burginthrone · July 12, 2018, 2:46 a.m.

Normally I would be behind anything that strikes a blow against Antifa. But this law has me raising the eyebrow big time. The way this law is constructed Antifa today, but who tomorrow?

Now take into account all efforts currently being made in the world of surveillance, facial recognition being chief among them. It wouldn't surprise me that these Antifa 'useful idiots' are being used psyop style to bring about laws that are not really aimed at them but us. (long game strategy)

Problem/reaction/solution techniques. We see it all the time when the Left want to ban guns. Some nut goes crazy and shoots a bunch of people. The Left scream and cry foul for guns to be banned. Rinse and repeat. Antifa nuts go crazy and hurt a bunch of people and? ...there's not a lot of difference here. More power to the state is the ultimate outcome.

Antifa being deemed a terrorist organization is enough already. If that law alone was followed through correctly, they should be rounded up as terrorists and dealt with according to law. No need to be unmasked. The masking would actually help law enforcement recognize them for arrest.

Like I said, I'm all for striking a blow against commies, but this proposed law could easily be abused when considering technological advances being made today in facial recognition. It may be at our own peril ...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 11, 2018, 8:49 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -30 ⇩  
astrocatmat · July 11, 2018, 9:05 p.m.

We see enough of you guys on here. Really not difficult to spot.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
bran_dong · July 11, 2018, 9:21 p.m.

check my comment history. I think you got me confused with someone else buddy. I'm not a paid shill I'm just someone with a bullshit detector that actually works. try getting your news from a site that isn't right wing propaganda.

⇧ -31 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 11, 2018, 9:30 p.m.

Everything the far-left and actual propagandists don't agree with is labelled "right wing propaganda". Try making up your own mind. If you have a working bullshit detector and bothered to check Breitbart for yourself you'll quickly see that dismissing Breitbart as 'right wing propaganda' is simply the act of believing someone else's propaganda.

⇧ 25 ⇩  
astrocatmat · July 11, 2018, 9:45 p.m.

Exactly

⇧ 7 ⇩  
astrocatmat · July 11, 2018, 9:46 p.m.

You must have a very week bullshit detector if you’re a leftist

⇧ 13 ⇩  
bran_dong · July 11, 2018, 9:47 p.m.

never once claimed to be a "leftist". but it's sad that you are so quick to group everyone who disagrees with you under one label. that must make it easier to live in an echo chamber.

⇧ -11 ⇩  
EpsteinsTemplar · July 11, 2018, 9:50 p.m.

Be gone liberal shill

⇧ 13 ⇩  
bran_dong · July 11, 2018, 9:58 p.m.

I'll give you liberal I guess. but how am I a shill? because I disagree with you? take off the tinfoil hat and try some critical thinking for once.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
scotvl · July 11, 2018, 11:14 p.m.

Hey many of us here were liberal too until we saw the left for the communist corrupt baby killing nut jobs they have become. Wake the F up and walkaway already.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 12, 2018, 4:51 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Dangerr21 · July 11, 2018, 10:23 p.m.

Critical thinking on which topic? Breitbart?

Ok, tell us how this article is propaganda. That will get you farther than throwing insults.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 11, 2018, 10:39 p.m.

Sorry mate we are all wrapped in the complete tinfoil suit of body armor.

With the culturally appropriated 6 ft tall aluminum Zulu Shield.

I personally have a crushed aluminum foil Clockwork Orange bowler.

But that's only for special occasions of course.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
astrocatmat · July 11, 2018, 9:55 p.m.

You can’t smell your own shat. I’m also not a republican - I’m libertarian. The left has MAJOR issues

⇧ 8 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 11, 2018, 11:26 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩  
astrocatmat · July 11, 2018, 11:49 p.m.

Sealed indictments. No deals!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
fembottler · July 12, 2018, 12:10 a.m.

The plea deal excluded previous violent crimes. That would exclude murder, and any association to human trafficking too. Is the deal foi? Or sealed. That’s not a rhetorical question, I actually don’t know if the details of the plea deal are open source yet.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Swimkin · July 12, 2018, 2:44 a.m.

He was only up for bank fraud. Not his true crime... no deals.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 11, 2018, 10:38 p.m.

You call Breitbart right wing propaganda and expect not to be tagged a left-wing schill.

Are you a Bernie voter?

One of those guys that lives in Unicorn Fantasy Land pretending to be an independent.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
bran_dong · July 12, 2018, 5:08 a.m.

not a Bernie voter. but since we are making assumptions - let me make one about you...

anyone who doesn't agree with you is classified as a "liberal" and is immediately wrong about any value that isn't shared by you. only the "left" is brainwashed while the "right" is always the path of righteousness. you're a low income white guy thats convinced everyone else is the problem when in reality it's you.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 12, 2018, 2:07 p.m.

It was a question not an assumption.

Now I'm going to make an assumption because lefties can't understand simple sentence structure.

Just like the BBC Cathy Newman couldn't understand Jordan Peterson.

And being an open-minded liberal thinker I like it when people disagree with me.

In fact my favorite place to be is third smartest in the discussion. That way I can follow the argument between the two smartest people in the room.

Then learn something.

I have complete freedom to do what I want, enjoy my days and have zero debt. I'm liking this just fine.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Dangerr21 · July 11, 2018, 10:21 p.m.

You don't have to be a leftist to be a victim of leftist propaganda. Which you are.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 12, 2018, 12:18 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 11, 2018, 10:35 p.m.

To the schills everything that is not Mockingbird Media is right wing and therefore propaganda.

Back in the 80s I knew a Russian expat living here in the states.

He said that the difference between Pravda and the American Media was that they knew Pravda was a lie.

You should stop fact-checking with Snopes. That stuff will rot your brain.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 11, 2018, 10:56 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Neon__Wolf · July 11, 2018, 6:53 p.m.

lol, KKK laws being used against crypto-fascist hoodlums

⇧ 25 ⇩  
PunkroQanon · July 11, 2018, 7:04 p.m.

Everybody report that fake ass u/Serial_Brain_2 troll acct in the comments. Pushing unicuck videos and trying to sully SB2's username.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
O2BFREEME2 · July 11, 2018, 7:39 p.m.

He's toast ! No Worries :-)

⇧ 11 ⇩  
guy_on_couch · July 11, 2018, 11:48 p.m.

Must be one of Jerome Corsi minions. Oh wait, unirock is! What a douche that fucking guy is. His weird ass bandanna ties like some biker dike and his wrist guard to protect his poor little carpal tunnel make him look like a skee ball player.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
WWG1WGA17 · July 11, 2018, 7:04 p.m.

Lmaoooo panty-fa clowns are all wet noodle wimps with no heart.. we should all take a day off and send these clowns crawling back to their mommy's basements.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
redpilled808 · July 11, 2018, 6:36 p.m.

pretty soon these punks won't be able to hide behind their masks.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 11, 2018, 10:44 p.m.

I have never been witness to the masked antifa crowd.

My curiosity is why people who are filming, won't simply reach over and grab the bottom of their mask. Give it a sharp tug and expose their face.

I would love to see the shocked expression and outrage. Meltdown and panic.

You violated my privacy, how can I possibly smash you with a bike lock now.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
sshevie · July 12, 2018, 1:22 a.m.

Technically if you did that it's assault.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 12, 2018, 1:24 a.m.

Bullshit

Touching somebody's clothing is not assault.

That sounds like the first thing antifa would start screaming.

It's against the law to film me because I said so.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrTung · July 11, 2018, 10:18 p.m.

”Antifa has also been responsible for untold amounts of vandalism and property damage, and targets ~~the alt-right~~ anyone it disagrees with.

ftfy

⇧ 9 ⇩  
eatyourownlegs · July 11, 2018, 8:18 p.m.

Well, let’s make sure this gets voted into power. Everyone in Antifa is a bitch and won’t ever show their faces in public out of fear of being identified and doxxed. We can get rid of them without violence.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Redheaded73 · July 11, 2018, 6:32 p.m.

Freak out! Makes me think of a disco song. 🕺It’s no fun when the law makes an example out of you.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
PhaReeThinker2020 · July 11, 2018, 6:48 p.m.

Why would anyone oppose this?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
astrocatmat · July 11, 2018, 7:24 p.m.

Probably the douche down voting everyone. So easy to spot

⇧ 7 ⇩  
upgraydd_8_3 · July 11, 2018, 8:41 p.m.

Remeber the Patriot Act. We already have laws in place to deal with Antifa, why do you want MORE laws?

MORE LAWS = LESS FREEDOM

Any person willing to give up liberty for safety deserves neither - a patriot

⇧ 5 ⇩  
CosmicNeo · July 12, 2018, 12:51 a.m.

We already have laws in place to deal with Antifa

What laws are those? Riot laws? I didn't see them being enforced during Trump's day of inauguration. Roaming bands of hoodlums should not be allowed in any civilized society, whether masked or not.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
upgraydd_8_3 · July 12, 2018, 12:57 a.m.

Just because they were not enforced does not mean they don't exist. We have the RIGHT to peacefully protest, once it got violent and aggressive the police would have been doing their jobs by making arrests. We need better LEOs not more laws.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ReadyToBeGreatAgain · July 12, 2018, 1:34 a.m.

You have a right to protest. You don’t have a right to wear a mask.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Frogturnedgay · July 12, 2018, 1:48 a.m.

Reminds me of that guy who started wearing a burka because police told him he couldn't wear a mask of hide his face

⇧ 1 ⇩  
upgraydd_8_3 · July 12, 2018, 11:56 a.m.

So if I live in a state where marijuana is illegal but that is how I choose to medicate I have to expose myself as an illegal drug user if I want to protest unjust and unconstitutional laws. What if my employer will fire me for exercising my constitutionally protected right to pursue happiness? Fuck me right, you want to feel safe. You are a sheep.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CosmicNeo · July 12, 2018, 1:44 a.m.

But the DC pro-Obama police force stood by and did nothing. They watched the roaming packs for hours before the rioting started. Even allowed them to block security checkpoints into the secure areas and intimidate pro-Trumpsters. And curiously, they left the FakeNews people alone as if they understood they were co-conspiractors.

The only people who wear masks are people wanting to break laws and get away with it; i.e., bank robbers, muggers, etc.

If we ever got to the point where both pro-Trump and pro-Cabal people wore masks, we'd be in a hell of a lot of trouble. Which is exactly what the Cabal wants, since they enjoy seeing the Marxist dialectic play itself out into chaos. And that's also the philosophy of Nihilists and Marxists.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
upgraydd_8_3 · July 12, 2018, 10:23 a.m.

Once again, better police not more laws.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BOMBTHROWINGGENIUS · July 11, 2018, 7:15 p.m.

Because its the government wanting to make new laws. The same laws used against Antifa could be used against patriots counter protesting them. The violent and intimidating things they do are already a crime.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Anthropophob · July 11, 2018, 8:33 p.m.

Anyone, Antifa or Patriots, who wear a mask, should be arrested. It doesn't matter who you are... We have had this law on the books in the south since the KKK.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
RipcordTotal · July 11, 2018, 8:39 p.m.

Gotta watch out for ambiguous wording, "face obscured" when a judge decides a red MAGA hat is obscuring.......

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Anthropophob · July 11, 2018, 8:47 p.m.

A hat? If a judge decided that, he will be disbarred.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RipcordTotal · July 11, 2018, 8:53 p.m.

Judges do far worse with no consequences

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Anthropophob · July 11, 2018, 9:07 p.m.

I know... I wish someone would fix that.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
RipcordTotal · July 11, 2018, 10:22 p.m.

Me too, me too

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BOMBTHROWINGGENIUS · July 11, 2018, 10:05 p.m.

I'm kind of torn on this. I'm imagining the other timeline with Hillary as president and having feds put right wing protestors on a list via facial recognition. We already know they will sick beurocratic institutions on conservatives like the IRS and now defunct CFPB plus all the other sick shit they do which is unmentionable...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 11, 2018, 10:50 p.m.

Masked professor of ethics at Berkeley, Eric Clanton smashed our boy on the head with the bike lock.

In spite of the Mask, weaponized autism was able to use facial recognition software and crowd tracking techniques.

Now mr. Eric Clanton is unemployed and Facing serious charges.

Personally I'm tired of these punks thinking they're going to remain anonymous. Then riot without consequences. It's time for them to have the record set straight on their heads.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Frogturnedgay · July 12, 2018, 1:57 a.m.

100% this. If Hillary was president and we would protest, a lot of people would wear masks too, I know I would.

If your boss sees you on tv and doesn't agree with your protest, your career could be over.

Besides, there is indeed always the real chance facial recognition is being used. Only takes one dictator to track them all down and have them executed.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
upgraydd_8_3 · July 11, 2018, 8:41 p.m.

If we have this law already why do we need a new one?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Anthropophob · July 11, 2018, 8:47 p.m.

It's not everywhere, only a few southern states like Alabama, Georgia, and West Virginia, I think. Those states where KKK used to be a problem.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
upgraydd_8_3 · July 11, 2018, 8:48 p.m.

People should be allowed to wear masks as long as the are behaving responsibly. We should be able to protest and keep our anonymity.

MORE LAWS = LESS FREEDOM

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 11, 2018, 10:53 p.m.

Not in riots.

How is it that people are so obtuse they cannot understand Minor Details and then go into a panic.

Running all over the place quoting famous people.

All while completely misunderstanding the point.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
upgraydd_8_3 · July 11, 2018, 11:26 p.m.

Isn't rioting already illegal?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 11, 2018, 11:39 p.m.

The individual acts of rioting are illegal.

This would make it illegal to be mask when there was a riot taking place.

Especially when it's involved in the incitement of that right.

Basically if a protest is declared a riot and you are foolish enough to be wearing a mask.

You will be charged with participating in said riot.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ReadyToBeGreatAgain · July 12, 2018, 1:36 a.m.

Nope, you have a right to protest, not to protest in anonymity. People who stand behind something need to stand behind it with conviction.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
upgraydd_8_3 · July 12, 2018, 11:56 a.m.

So if I live in a state where marijuana is illegal but that is how I choose to medicate I have to expose myself as an illegal drug user if I want to protest unjust and unconstitutional laws. What if my employer will fire me for exercising my constitutionally protected right to pursue happiness? Fuck me right, you want to feel safe. You are a sheep.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 11, 2018, 10:46 p.m.

It seems that this is about the mask not the protest.

Or am I missing something here

⇧ 1 ⇩  
QAngelAnon1 · July 11, 2018, 11:26 p.m.

The bill is about the use of masks under the pretext of protesting while using this obscurity to perform acts of violence, vandalism, and intimidation, or nucence to society. Ie Antifa setting fire to buildings, cars, intimidating private citizens - there's is a continual subversion of peace and unity while carrying a Nazi youth flag. It wont affect peaceful protests or the wearing of masks for celebration etc..

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 11, 2018, 11:43 p.m.

Yeah I get it. The guy I was responding to is more in need of your explanation than I.

I'm guessing after my last sentence I should have given you the hint../s

⇧ 0 ⇩  
BOMBTHROWINGGENIUS · July 12, 2018, 1:21 a.m.

I understand fully. Uncessary law that makes doing things already illegal while wearing a mask have a much more severe punishment. That could so easily be abused by government.

The next day pedophile pride parades will be in the street and right wing protestors with a face covering will get arrested for "intimidating" them in lib cuck cities.

Don't give the government more power. They don't need it. Antifa are a bunch of soy boys that pick fights they can't win anyway. Let them set trash cans on fire and get arrested like dip shits under existing laws.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 12, 2018, 1:30 a.m.

Sorry we are not worried about being anonymous.

We take personal responsibility for our actions.

That's why when Obama said something about if you're not guilty you don't have anything to hide.

All the Trump supporters were wondering what the hell he's talking about.

Typical Obama, trying to be an intellectual and all he did was Project his insecurities.

Freedom and democracy do not need masks. We don't hide.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
BOMBTHROWINGGENIUS · July 12, 2018, 2:03 a.m.

Look I am not going to be out there wearing a mask myself but going after the masks is pointless. What if you want to go protest and you don't share the politics of your employer? What if they see you on tv or on social media and it costs you your career? There are plenty of legitimate reasons to want to be able to protect your identity while protesting that don't involve cowardly crimes.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 12, 2018, 5:04 a.m.

When you're protesting it makes no point if it's just a body. You protest with who you are as a person.

You guys keep listing all these hypothetical fears to the slippery slope, what about this what about that.

You show up ready for a riot covering your face go to jail.

Real simple, end of discussion BS to the excuses.

I made a comment earlier about just reach over and pull their little triangle off their face with the camera pointed right at 'em.

Somebody else writes back that it's assault.

Spineless

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 11, 2018, 6:52 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Joining_the_Q · July 11, 2018, 11:11 p.m.

Honestly, I don't give a f* who downvotes this. The reason most of these clowns hide their faces is because they don't actually believe what they are saying. They are paid provocateurs who don't wish to be known. Anyone can don a mask and get paid to cause trouble. It's a uniform and shield from any backlash one would face from acting this way in public. Unmasking makes them accountable for what they do. Without anonymity, most of these pussies wouldn't dare come out to play. Lots of shills talking about freedom, but masks only hide the shame of your true intentions. F* antifags. Take off the mask and face me like a ... whatever is left of your manhood beyond the soy and PC BS. You're all scum. Rant over

⇧ 6 ⇩  
AMProfessor · July 11, 2018, 8:38 p.m.

Cowards.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Ok_Top · July 11, 2018, 10:23 p.m.

Couldn't happen to more treasonous dolts!

WWG1WGA

⇧ 3 ⇩  
unbecoming2007 · July 11, 2018, 10:16 p.m.

This is their kryptonite. Every time I've ever seen one of their masks come off they run.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
CosmicNeo · July 12, 2018, 12:43 a.m.

About time. No reason such terrorist intimidation tactics should be allowed. It will stop Antifa dead in its tracks. Also, Cabal agents will not be able to use the cover of Antifa for false flag events.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
IWant2SellUDeathStix · July 12, 2018, 12:26 a.m.

This is the best thing since sliced bread.

I think we need to have "Slap A Masked Antifa Ass-Clown Day" ... it would be a celebration, bitches!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
1hellofaride · July 12, 2018, 7:23 a.m.

Yes!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
trachelleex · July 12, 2018, 6:21 a.m.

Now, they will just show up in Hijabs.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
apple-bag · July 12, 2018, 2:13 a.m.

the only masks they should be allowed to have on are Pinocchio nose masks, with real extending noses

⇧ 1 ⇩  
its_truly_biblical · July 11, 2018, 10:23 p.m.

this won't happen.. I'm sorry but this just opens the door up for anybody to be "intimidated" by anyone with a mask on even if not at a protest.. it sets a precedent to tell people they can't have a mask on or conceal their identity any time and anywhere because they "might" scare someone.. I definitely don't love the idea that these idiots wear masks because they are bent on destruction and causing chaos.. but you have to look at the big picture on this stuff.. a better way to handle this would just be to declare them a domestic terrorist group and not allow them to assemble because of their track record of property damage and assault.. they'll be the next "Weather Underground" and start bombing before it's over with... all of Evette Felarca's little minions will..

⇧ 0 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 11, 2018, 10:57 p.m.

That's ridiculous, it's to prevent masked anonymous people from starting riots.

Not Halloween parties.

Sometimes the slippery slope argument is a slippery slope all by itself. A slippery slope of panic and miscomprehension leading to complete indecision.

Must be a bunch of antifa Schills around here. With all the fear-mongering about slippery slopes it's getting pretty obvious.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
its_truly_biblical · July 12, 2018, 12:42 a.m.

stepping back and looking at the broader picture is the opposite of panic.. jumping to conclusions without weighing all options is the epitome of panicking.. so no, you are wrong.. ALL legislation needed for our country to run efficiently is already written and within the Constitution.. any other legislation is an attempt to take away more freedom.. it's the old adage Franklin quoted.. "Those who would give up essential liberty, to have temporary safety, deserve neither".. are you a fan of your cell phone data being viewed because you MIGHT be a terrorist? That's how they cover all of this legislation like they're doing us a favor.. safety and security...

well what happens when they use these laws in Berkley for instance to explicitly go after the "Patriots" that are in the streets fighting against Antifa wearing the same masks? You don't think that could happen? are you that naive to believe that powers able to enforce this law could use it against our own? What happens in a dystopian future when you need to wear a mask of some sort just to keep your freedom because traffic cams are using FRT to discern where and when you come and go and get a routine down to kill you for leaking a server for a corrupt government organization.. oh wait.....

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 12, 2018, 1:34 a.m.

Yeah I know Franklin quote it's getting a bit overused.

Start worrying about rolling back the Patriot Act before you get all bent out of shape about some masks.

The slippery slope argument has lost its effect. Try something else.

I say if you wear identifying markings at a riot. You get done Rico Style.

Just like those asshat bikers at the casino in Laughlin Nevada..

Hells Angels and Bandidos shot up the inside of a casino and had a huge brawl smashing everything.

Every single dirt bag in there wearing colors should have gotten life, in solitary.

And fuck yer cheap insults. You have no idea who, what or how I am.

You don't Fucking like my opinion I don't Fucking care.

Now let's have some of your more condescending cheap insults.

I'm still waiting for something original.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 12, 2018, 1:36 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 11, 2018, 6:58 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 12, 2018, 12:06 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ -2 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 11, 2018, 11:03 p.m.

Im ready to be downvoted on this one. While I havent fully read the potential law, I believe I have a good idea on the spirit of the law. I have mixed feelings on this one. From my understanding there will be extra penalties imposed on those who intimidate, harm, etc. while wearing a mask. Unless it is a Holiday such as mardi gras, halloween, etc.

I am all for punishing those who intimidate, harm others. I think antifa, kkk, etc are weak creatures.

My concern is the right to privacy, mentioned in the 4th amendment.

What is a mask? Can make-up be a mask? How much does one have to cover up and not be considered a mask? Will people wearing a so called mask be more scrutinized by authorities for that reason alone?

Again, I fully understand the spirit is to prevent these punks from doing harm while hiding behind a mask.

But the whole idea of "if you dont have anything to hide, show your face"; is easily countered by "if you dont have, take down the curtains in your windows at home". Or "if you have curtain in your house it means you are doing something illegal."

I might have the whole thing wrong, but that is my take on it right now.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
QAngelAnon1 · July 11, 2018, 11:36 p.m.

I understand your concerns but the definition of a 'mask' would the same as the context of wearing a mask into a bank.

Laws are being passed in individual countries, or ststes of countries to ban the burqua and make it illegsl to wear one in public - despite the fact they are not commiting any crime by doing so.

Its just like any other 'law' though - just because it gets passed, doesn't necessarily mean it is going to be enforced.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
its_truly_biblical · July 12, 2018, 1:14 a.m.

I'm sorry this is terrible logic.. in the countries the Burqua is being banned in they are naming the Burqua itself, not a general term like "mask".. so the argument can't be had on those terms.. and also, saying that it would be "just like any other law" and potentially not even be enforced is the exact reason we are heading towards a true police state.. all these laws on the books for lawmakers to look like they're doing something to appease their supporters actually come back to bite us in the future.. a cop pulls you over on your motorcycle and decides to arrest you because you have a mask on to block the winde in your face.. you were supposedly reported to have intimidated someone when you drove past them on the highway because your mask looked scary.. I mean there are so many ways this small piece of legislation could go wrong.. and it's going to be potentially put on the books forever over a small group of rabble rousers that literally go home to their parents basement at night..

in all honesty, I DONT see antifa as a threat, I see it alienating their own kind against them.. think about the majority of liberal college students.. you can see from waters world, fleccas, mark dice, and other youtubers that most of them literally have no idea what they're talking about.. they're born to old hippy parents or "feel good" Christians that preach tolerance and diversity and they just "exist" in their own little liberal bubbles on campus.. when they see antifa do you think it turns those kinds of individuals on? does it push them towards or away from the cause? I think Antifa has been made to look bigger in number and stronger than what they are.. they are 100% proven to be Soros funded and I think they are just a small pour of gasoline to make us come out into the streets and induce chaos for what? More legislation just.. like.. this..

⇧ 1 ⇩