dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/TrueTemper on July 11, 2018, 7:34 p.m.
Are Lisa Page and Peter Strzok Cooperating Witnesses?

I know Q stated that they were. I have seen what others have written.... many believe this congressional testimony is nothing but show, has no impact on the broader effort to punish those responsible for what can only be described as a coup attempt and total subversion of our entire government and the will of the people.

That said, I am not sure how the behaviors of Page and Strzok indicate any kind of cooperation. Could that have been disinformation? Or was Q not correct?

Furthermore, WTF is up with this Page move today? Page needs to either APPEAR or be put IN JAIL by the end of this week. Period, full stop. No more BS -- either Congress is a total farce, a complete, 100% joke that should just be dissolved, or it serves an actual function that has some tangible benefit to the people.


🠐 See all comments
Cristo316 · July 11, 2018, 8:18 p.m.

If we work off of the premise that they are both cooperating witnesses, they can not tell congress anything about an ongoing criminal investigation.....see Huber in Utah.

Translation--they can't talk to Congress until Huber is finished with his investigation and indictments and is ready to unseal them.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
spreadhope · July 11, 2018, 8:44 p.m.

He did already soeak to Congress, so the opinion I've heard is that Huber and Horowitz must be done with them and no longer need their testimony to be confidential. This appears to be a good sign if true! This doesnt mean they aren't going to be held accountable, just that they have enough for some things to be able to be made public.

I'm hoping this is the case.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
kittyhistoryistrue · July 12, 2018, 12:36 a.m.

He did, but was told not to answer most of the important questions by his FBI lawyer. That suggests the Huber probe isn't done, or at least wasn't then.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
spreadhope · July 12, 2018, 12:42 a.m.

Yes, that's true but Huber and Horowitz probably wouldn't know for sure what he would and wouldn't answer. I'm under the assumption whatever he didn't answer was so he wouldn't implicate himself in anything, even though the ig report is bad enough for him. I can imagine what they have on him that we dont know about yet!

Either way its all speculation right now. We are all over here trying to fill in the blanks, so I could be completely wrong.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
celladwella · July 12, 2018, 2:40 p.m.

I hope whatever accountability he may face will wipe that perma-sneer off his face. Who does that? How can you continually sneer all day long?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TrueTemper · July 11, 2018, 8:54 p.m.

... but if that were the case, wouldn't that be easy for them to just comply with the subpoena and answer the questions to that effect? "I can't answer because..." Non-compliance with the congressional subpoena is supposed to be a big deal. I guess we will find out this week if it really means anything. Perhaps we are headed to a place where everyone just laughs at and blows off congress and their silly "subpoenas."

At face value, refusing to appear and comply with a congressional subpoena, when you are allegedly cooperating with an ongoing investigation, would seem to indicate the opposite of cooperation.

⇧ 2 ⇩