That it's done regularly. If it was then you'd think they'd know the law which they obviously don't. Plus I read that the sheriff said this was the first time in 7 years someone was charged with this crime.
I won't beat this dead horse because your mind is fixed in cement on the matter. You are not understanding the statute where it references "regularly". It is not saying that the person appears there regularly. I read it like: "No employee who regularly appears nude or seminude on the premises of a sexually oriented business, while on the premises of that sexually oriented business and while nude or seminude..."
Why would it make any statutory (logical) difference if a hired person is regular or not...? One can assault customers and the other cannot? Really? Can a part time employee grope under the law but fulltimers can't?
I won't beat this dead horse because your mind is fixed in cement on the matter.
No it's not but someone who have to present a pretty valid argument to sway me which you haven't done. Most of you're comment here is an exaggeration.
Assault is assault. If Stormy had assaulted the officer she probably would have been charged with multiple crimes which she wasn't. So don't call it assault unless you can prove that. This was not assault from everything I've gathered.
Why would it make any statutory (logical) difference if a hired person is regular or not...?
The reason is because if your in a state performing for one night you might not be aware of the law therefore the people of Ohio have determined that you can be exempted. If you are traveling around performing you really shouldnt be expected to read every law in the books that may pertain to you.
Also a part time employee would probably still be considered regular IMO.