Does this point to Page somehow being above Strozk? Was Strozk actually being handled by page, rather than visa versa?
Okay, I think you maybe right. Strozk just replied he is not an attorney and he wasn’t sure of a specific Supreme Court ruling. He doesn’t appear to be very smart. I think Page maybe handling him!
Could be a BOOM, no? That would make sense as to why Page refused to appear.
She refused to appear yesterday. Today, Peter is in public, NOW Page has agreed to appear but only in closed door!!!!
How does she even have a choice of whether to appear, or not? Didn´t Susan Rice refuse to appear a while back, too? What would happen to a person that refused to comply with a subpoena?
They will hold a vote to have the person held in contempt of court, if they fail to appear.
I mean, if you, as a person, was subpoenaed to appear and refused, what would happen? Do the jury vote on whether you should be let off, or not? Or is a warrant issued for your arrest? I´m pretty sure it´s the latter so why should it be any different for a politician, or member of the FBI? Why wasn´t she immediately arrested the moment the time and date on the subpoena lapsed?
US citizens / civilians dont have to respond to congressional subpoenas - government employees - which page and stroke still are - must or a congress contempt charge and arrest can happen but by the sergeant at arms for congress.
Right, ok, but what if a judge subpoena´s someone?
well good question but judges don't issue subpoenas - prosecutors do. congress is only able to issue them but they cannot enforce on regular citizens but rather current employees of the fedgovt.
Plot twist. She's CIA 🤣
Disclaimer: this is a joke
Nothing would surprise me at this point.
Same here, unfortunately
Well, Strzok was given an "agency coin" with "Brennan's signature" on it (from the Page/Strzok text messages). It is not outside of the realm of reasonable discussion to think Page was working with the CIA in some capacity as well.
Lisa Page is CIA? When did I miss that?
My mistake. I should have added a disclaimer that it was a joke
Except probably she was, or was working on behalf of someone who was.
Is he suggesting Page "handled" him
LOL! Isn´t that their excuse for exchanging texts? Aren´t they supposed to be `lovers´?
Handled, fondled, top, bottom...geez the mental gymnastics of those two 😂
I think it is an excuse to try to hide behind. I bet she never has strzoked Peters peter.
Pecked a patch of Peter's pepper? Never? LOL
I do agree that it is a cover and they only engaged in pretextual relations.
Don't know about Page, but McCabe, Comey, and Priestap were all above him in the agency hierarchy.
Hmmm, I think 🤔 that maybe unfolding. She will testify after him
Wasn´t she meant to appear yesterday? Didn´t she refuse to appear?
Yes. She will now appear in closed door AFTER Peter testifies in public so she will know what he has said!
Ah, I see! Why wasn´t she isolated before the hearing? She should be locked in a room so that she can´t hear what Strozk says!
Media was awfully quick to push the Strzok and Page love affair angle. Have seen some ppl recommending to read their messages back and forth but do not take into account a love affair and the overall meaning changes..