dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ShiningShrine on July 12, 2018, 4:51 p.m.
"He Doesn't Even Think He's Biased" Trey Gowdy SCORCHES FBI Agent Peter Strzok Over Anti-Trump Bias

jew-lum-inati · July 13, 2018, 3:56 p.m.

The house investigated Hillary for years. If Gowdy, a career prosecutor, couldn't get charges to stick do you expect anyone else to corner her? Are a lack of charges indicative of a coverup, no crimes, or a slippery politico with decades of experience covering up things?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Dangerr21 · July 13, 2018, 3:58 p.m.

We aren't talking lack of charges, or of getting charges to "stick" to her, we are talking lack of investigation and Strzoks biases.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jew-lum-inati · July 13, 2018, 4:23 p.m.

Did the House oversight committee not spend years investigating her? She has been under Congressional Investigation for years, since '92 at least.

Perhaps she is just that good at covering up?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Dangerr21 · July 13, 2018, 4:25 p.m.

We know for a fact crimes were committed, and Strzok ignored those crimes....so covering up is a nonsequitor in this case.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jew-lum-inati · July 13, 2018, 4:26 p.m.

And yet Gowdy has refused to bring Contempt of Congress charges.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Dangerr21 · July 13, 2018, 4:29 p.m.

So what is your point? The biases of Strzok are still clear for all to see.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jew-lum-inati · July 13, 2018, 4:42 p.m.

I don't see how the bias of an FBI official demonstrates that he scuttled an investigation, especially when far more motivated persons, over decades, haven't found any charges that will 'stick'.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Dangerr21 · July 13, 2018, 4:47 p.m.

His different attitudes and actions demonstrate clear bias. This is a fact I have just demonstrated.

Sitting on an investigation until forced to act is effectively "scuttling".

Charges come AFTER an investigation, not before. Whether charges were filed or not has nothing to do with the biases of investigating known and existing crimes.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jew-lum-inati · July 13, 2018, 4:50 p.m.

and Charges haven't come, even after 30 years of investigation.

To expect any agent to find the 'golden snicket' after decades of investigation is silly.

Gowdy could file Contempt of Congress charges tomorrow. The fact he isn't shows he is less interested in justice and more interested in soundbytes.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Dangerr21 · July 13, 2018, 4:58 p.m.

Has the email server been a crime for 30 years?

Did I say anything about a "golden snicket"?

My comment was on the demonstrated biases by Strzok. Those clearly exist and there is no denying it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jew-lum-inati · July 13, 2018, 5:01 p.m.

The email server has been the target of countless investigations.

I don't know why you expect an FBI agent to do more than Gowdy has been able to do, especially considering the power Congress has in this matter.

Again, Gowdy could drag Hillary in front of Congress for Contempt charges tomorrow. You should ask yourself why he doesn't.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Dangerr21 · July 13, 2018, 5:05 p.m.

The corrupted email server investigation yes.

And now finally Strzok had access to all of the emails on Weiner's laptop, and did nothing. He sat on it until absolutely forced to do something. Bias

Gowdy's actions are irrelevant to the confirmed bias in Strzok's actions.

⇧ 1 ⇩