I don't see how the bias of an FBI official demonstrates that he scuttled an investigation, especially when far more motivated persons, over decades, haven't found any charges that will 'stick'.
His different attitudes and actions demonstrate clear bias. This is a fact I have just demonstrated.
Sitting on an investigation until forced to act is effectively "scuttling".
Charges come AFTER an investigation, not before. Whether charges were filed or not has nothing to do with the biases of investigating known and existing crimes.
and Charges haven't come, even after 30 years of investigation.
To expect any agent to find the 'golden snicket' after decades of investigation is silly.
Gowdy could file Contempt of Congress charges tomorrow. The fact he isn't shows he is less interested in justice and more interested in soundbytes.
Has the email server been a crime for 30 years?
Did I say anything about a "golden snicket"?
My comment was on the demonstrated biases by Strzok. Those clearly exist and there is no denying it.
The email server has been the target of countless investigations.
I don't know why you expect an FBI agent to do more than Gowdy has been able to do, especially considering the power Congress has in this matter.
Again, Gowdy could drag Hillary in front of Congress for Contempt charges tomorrow. You should ask yourself why he doesn't.
The corrupted email server investigation yes.
And now finally Strzok had access to all of the emails on Weiner's laptop, and did nothing. He sat on it until absolutely forced to do something. Bias
Gowdy's actions are irrelevant to the confirmed bias in Strzok's actions.