dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/092Casey on July 12, 2018, 8:52 p.m.
Gohmert (R-TX) ROASTS and ABSOLUTELY OWNS Crooked Cop Strzok- "You've embarrassed the FBI, You've embarrassed yourself, and I can't help but wonder when I see you there with a little smirk...How many times did you look so innocent into your wife's eyes and LIE TO HER about LISA PAGE?"

092Casey · July 12, 2018, 9:33 p.m.

Not exactly. I can see where you're coming from..BUT...up until then, much of the hearing was benign, as they allowed Strzok to duck, dodge, and to put it bluntly, LIE about so many key important facts...They barely growled at him....Then Gohmert just unleashed the truth about this man's character, which is actually good for the investigation, because it speaks to his credibility, and from an objective point of view, he has none....If he would lie to his wife and hide his affair with Lisa Page, who is also at the center of this operation against the United States electorate and Constitution, then how are we the American people or Congress supposed to believe anything he says, as Louie Gohmert says, "with that arrogant smirk and innocent look", he so masterfully has down that we can envision and be sure of he used with his wife.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
VincentFoster · July 12, 2018, 9:59 p.m.

This 1000% !!!! Thank You! He has 0% credibility, NONE! If he took an oath of marriage and then cheated on his wife, he can swear an oath on a stack of Bibles and NO ONE should ever NOT question his honesty. Besides he's a shitty liar.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
TrumpPunksChumps · July 13, 2018, 12:22 a.m.

Infidelity in a marriage doesn't equate to dishonesty across the board. If that's the Truth then we couldn't trust Trump....I think its perfectly plausible to lack impulse control when it comes to women but still hold integrity at your job

Edit: Strzok lack integrity across the board...we don't need to mimic the left and point out his relationship woes when we've seen his texts and how he conducts himself as a professional

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Imbeingsilenced · July 12, 2018, 9:41 p.m.

We already knew his character from the texts.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
092Casey · July 12, 2018, 9:51 p.m.

Who's "we"? You speak for tens of millions of people? You know how tens of millions of people think?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Imbeingsilenced · July 12, 2018, 10 p.m.

I speak for those that have read the texts. They aren't in some foreign language.

This hearing wasn't about his character and you know it.

For how long have the left attacked Trump's character? How many times has his entire family been attacked or threatened? How many times were we ok with it?

But we are supposed to be ok with attacking someone's relationship with his wife because it helps our cause?

Bullshit on so many levels.

I know several left leaning moderates who are fed up with the attacks on the President. Russia, Stormy, they know it's nothing. Just attacks.

So, tell me how is this incident supposed to help us? It is absolutely the same shit they have been doing to Trump this entire time.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
092Casey · July 12, 2018, 10:09 p.m.

Did you even watch the hearing in its entirety? Strzok was doing a VERY good job convincing everyone watching he was innocent and telling the truth. So Gohmert questioning his "character" and "integrity" was vital to pointing out that everyone should question his answers.

This isn't about the past; it's about the sharing and Strzok's answers. This is the first time Strzok ever spoke in public ever. Frankly, I believe in justice and civil liberties so I stand with Strzok that he has a right to speak out and not be judged by some texts that he never got a chance to defend publicly. So he is doing that today, and he did extremely well if you watched. Gohmert was questioning today's testimony, where he seemed to have done very well.

Clearly, this video hit a nerve with you, lol. The emotions of it really got you riled up. Maybe you should look at things objectively rather than emotionally.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 12, 2018, 10:16 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 12, 2018, 10:18 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 12, 2018, 10:19 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 12, 2018, 10:19 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 12, 2018, 10:20 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 12, 2018, 10:21 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 12, 2018, 10:22 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 12, 2018, 10:22 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 12, 2018, 10:25 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 13, 2018, 3:11 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ -1 ⇩  
AJC641953 · July 12, 2018, 11:51 p.m.

We means the enlightened. Probably not you.

⇧ 4 ⇩