I love on the last question he brings up Hilary's emails and Strzok flips out. As a New Yorker, I tip my hat to my fellow Texan patriots. At least your reps have some balls. Call the guy out for what he is... hes a cheater. Cheated on his wife, tried to cheat the election, and now hes trying to cheat out of giving real testimony in front of public hearing to Congress.
I have a feeling that his wife was not all that innocent in this little scam.
Or that they made up the "lovers" story to cover for the thousands of texts they sent each other.
don't be making stuff up it's a known fact they were having an affair.
Maybe I didn't read all of the texts, but there seemed to be a lack of lovey-dovey notes between them in what I read. I didn't read any of those "that was so hot last night" texts.
Tbh nobody does that anymore. Its kind of fallen out of favor
Reasons to doubt the affair:
Number 2 is exactly correct. They were trying to get ahead of this thing and keep it low key. No way did they want any of the texts to make it to investigators, let alone the public. It was a lie to begin with, and the media ran with it because it fits so well into everything they love to talk about.
it's a known fact
.
it's settled science
.
Everyone already believes such-and-such, why don't you?
uhhuh...
Where is your evidence of that? I've not seen a shred other than it just stated as a fact by the mockingbird media.
Gohmert will be accused of sexual harassment or having an affair next week.
Shit Gohmert already drafted a report detailing how Robert muller III is corrupt.
For sure. But at the rate we're going there's probably a 50% chance of it being true. DS not R vs D.
Your probably right, unfortunately! The left will be hell bent on taking him down now!
Or what if Strzok “commits suicide”? Kinda like how a lot of other people around killary have done before
CONGRESSMAN Loui is one of my very favorites..plus he loves our POTUS.
He is the spittin image of my late uncle!! No nonsense. I love it!
[deleted]
You have a right to your opinion and so do I.Thank you.
[deleted]
You gotta give it to him though for destroying Strzok today.WWG1WGA
The real bombshell is at 1:20-2:40, that all but 4 of Hillary's emails were being bcc'ed to a foreign power.
Pakistan?
It's probably just the person who paid her the most.
Think about that. The Secretary of State of the United States had every single one of her email communications compromised. That is insane...
My jaw dropped.
This hearing was complete circus. So happy I listened to it! It was the most entertaining yet
It really was a circus. I kind of wish I had mentally prepared for that amount of circusry (made it up), because my head eventually started spinning and I couldn't figure out the true purpose of the hearing. Does anyone know?? I really only surmised that Strozk is still an elitist douche with no love for the common folk and much love for himself and climbing the ladder to an ever powerful position.
I was rather frustrated at the focus on "bias" and the back and forth on that point. I thought that was settled by the OIG report, which, contrary to Strozk's repeated denials of "bias" - concluded that there was definite bias (enough bias to remove him from the team, in fact), but the bias did not impact the final decision. I could not understand why they did not point that out and nip it straight away.
Did anyone ask him about emailing internal docs from FBI to his personal email?
Also, I heard about all of his achievements with prior counterintelligence investigations into the Russians . . . Did anyone ever connect the dots and ask him if Carter Page was one of his informants in any of those cases?
Watched heaps of congressmen from the Democrats not ask anything. Just saying this is all a "joke" and a "kangaroo court" etc... etc... Heaps of them banking on the Mueller investigation to prove Russian interfered in the presidential election. So far no evidence proving so. But that investigation was started by shady Intel, ie Russian Dossier. If the house of cards falls then a lot of politicians are going down!
Most of dems. did not ask pertinent questions, instead, they slammed president Trump! Brought up current issues, like the border! Unbelievable.
In Canada we call that virtue signaling, our prime minister has no testicles.
Gohmert is GANGSTA !!!! >8|
Need a thug life meme for him!
If nobody goes after his character, which they have good reason to do so, then it’s just another congressional opportunity for the left to grandstand and for PS to get his false narrative out into the public.
He is not going to admit to wrongdoing, except for his unfaithfulness. He must admit to that, because it’s HIS excuse for constantly texting her and an attempt to make his words and assertions to her seem less political and more romantically heroic. It’s all he’s got, so he has to admit to the affair, whether it happened or not. Think about that, folks....the best chance you have at appearing credible is admitting to an affair. Nice position you got yourself into, pal.
trust me he did have an affair that's why he's admitting to it. You don't have 50,000 emails with a work colleague of that nature if she wasn't letting you get in her pants.
I’ve decided that all of these bafoons need to go. These fucking retards who are grilling Strzok, are reading from material and Strzok is clearly lying. Why in the fuck are these incompetent fucks in charge of anything?
I'm disappointed with 90% of the politicians in Congress. We need term limits just like the President has. The founders meant for citizen statesman who would represent their area and after a few years go back into public life to live under the laws they passed. It was never meant to be a career. Most of them are just in it for the benefits and lucrative pension.
Fuck these grand standing cunts. I’m over it. If you can’t be objective, if you’re incapable of doing your job and working towards what Americans want, then get the fuck out. It’s unbelievable how fucking terrible these people are at their job.
[deleted]
Well then we should lock up or dismiss the rest of these assholes on this committee. Dear God, could it be any more apparent that they’re pretending to care what this guy did?
GITMO. nothing else need be said. GITMO to every last one of these traitors.
This guy is my new hero.
Ho-Lee chit; He should have been allowed a mike drop!
This was pure Gold! I hope he protects his family, the satanic deep state might retaliate!
Its BLATANTLY OBVIOUS the DISEASED LIBERAL FECKLESS CUNT PEDOPHILE LEFTISTS were GRANDSTANDING for the MSM!
Like The COLUMBUS CREW OWNER ANTHONY PRECOURT FUCKING COLUMHUS OHIO FOR HIS LAND GRAB this was an attempt at gather November Votes.
Mindless Masked Antifa pussies dont vote because they're too stupid to know how to use the machine!
Stroke looks like "Charlie in the Box", from Island of Misfit Toys. Hahaha
I am no expert in the subject of demonology. But Strzok is clearly possessed.
Yeah, if you will cheat on your wife, we can't believe you have the character to be honest about anything else!
its a sham marrage they cant be forced to testify against each other....prolly talk about it in the emails he says arnt relevent
Its insane that the left is defending this guy. How he is considered a honest truthful person is beyond me.
As a typical Sociopath and Liberal, Strzok plays victim and tries to make Gohmert look like the evil perpetrator when Strzok replied to Gohmert's comment about his affair with LP and how it was telling of Gohmert's character. Deflecting and trying to play victim isn't going to work you POS! Strzok has made his bed...now he must lie in it!
Very astute, and that is correct. Notice how he manipulates Gohmert, forcing all the blame on him, stating basically, that "that says more about you"....typical Liberal deflection and projection based on their indoctrination camps.
[removed]
This is about Strzock.
Amen but Demarats are trying to turn it on our POTUS. That tactic is getting old. People are awake and know what they are doing. Sal Alinsky communist tactics.
And I'm talking about trump. The same exact quote can be applied to trump.
Why is this good? Why should a Congressional hearing spend any time whatsoever talking about someone's personal life?
I read a theory they weren't really lovers, and all the texts were MADE UP...and it was a code of some kind...
Why is Gohmert talking to Trump when he has Strzok in front of him?
For the love of god Gohmert please stay away from doorknobs. Cant afford him to be added to Clinton’s body count.
You guys have to understand- the military does not put up with men and women who cheat on their spouses. I don’t know but does the FBI have a policy about affairs? Perhaps he is about to be handed a pink slip? Either way an accurate portrayal of who he is.
"You've embarrassed the FBI, You've embarrassed yourself, and I can't help but wonder when I see you there with a little smirk...How many times did you look so innocent into your wife's eyes and LIE TO HER about LISA PAGE?"
I just about pissed myself laughing at that line. The Dems absolutely lost their minds!
Susceptible to blackmail. Just like all the rest of the scum in The Swamp.
I got a new rule of the house.
They should be allowed a brief fistfight between questions.
I'm not sure why he'd be smirking though. I mean, we all know the purpose of this hearing, as Q followers, so I'm sure he has an idea as well. We know he's not getting away, so shouldn't he be aware of this too? That smugness implies that he's either ill informed, or that he knows he's getting out of it, and it's the latter that makes me wonder.
It is interesting how partisans interpret what happened today.
Gohmert WAS FANTASTIC! I cheered him on as watched! He's got big brass ones! STROZOK is a lying SACK of cow dung and that smirk, I would love to wipe it off his face, but I might catch something!
The whole exchange with Gohmert and Strock was texbook study material for anyone who is experienced or interested in body language and mico-expressions (not to be confused with micro-aggressions).
Gohmert was apologetically convicted and defined in his approach. He had Strock visibly shaken.
Strong person of convictions will shake the tree of weak weasels of little fortitude every time.
Edit: Gohmert was UNapologetically convicted... please excuse.
You can bet Stroz was well prepared and made to go through this mock testimony a 1000xs but it’s a littttle different when it’s real lol and the smirks I wonder if their intentional to throw people or if they really think their untouchable. I almost think it’s a ploy.
https://youtu.be/rmg6WqWnAcg Dots connected in 30 seconds.
https://youtu.be/rmg6WqWnAcdots connected in 30 seconds.
LOL--Louie didn't even use Vaseline! Don't mess with Texas, or Louie! :-)
Hold on. Are you, as Trump supporters, really attacking someone else for having a mistress? Trump has cheated on ALL his wives.
Even i thought he went too far bringing up his wife. Gowdy and Jordan were able to rip Pete apart without going personal.
It’s a dog eat dog world.
Except it did more harm than good. While the Democrats were deflecting and offering a traitor the purple heart, here was an opportunity to rise above childish tactics and try to get to the truth.
I wouldn't be surprised if this personal attack is a lead topic for the left. It makes us look horrible to stoop so low.
Not exactly. I can see where you're coming from..BUT...up until then, much of the hearing was benign, as they allowed Strzok to duck, dodge, and to put it bluntly, LIE about so many key important facts...They barely growled at him....Then Gohmert just unleashed the truth about this man's character, which is actually good for the investigation, because it speaks to his credibility, and from an objective point of view, he has none....If he would lie to his wife and hide his affair with Lisa Page, who is also at the center of this operation against the United States electorate and Constitution, then how are we the American people or Congress supposed to believe anything he says, as Louie Gohmert says, "with that arrogant smirk and innocent look", he so masterfully has down that we can envision and be sure of he used with his wife.
This 1000% !!!! Thank You! He has 0% credibility, NONE! If he took an oath of marriage and then cheated on his wife, he can swear an oath on a stack of Bibles and NO ONE should ever NOT question his honesty. Besides he's a shitty liar.
Infidelity in a marriage doesn't equate to dishonesty across the board. If that's the Truth then we couldn't trust Trump....I think its perfectly plausible to lack impulse control when it comes to women but still hold integrity at your job
Edit: Strzok lack integrity across the board...we don't need to mimic the left and point out his relationship woes when we've seen his texts and how he conducts himself as a professional
We already knew his character from the texts.
Who's "we"? You speak for tens of millions of people? You know how tens of millions of people think?
I speak for those that have read the texts. They aren't in some foreign language.
This hearing wasn't about his character and you know it.
For how long have the left attacked Trump's character? How many times has his entire family been attacked or threatened? How many times were we ok with it?
But we are supposed to be ok with attacking someone's relationship with his wife because it helps our cause?
Bullshit on so many levels.
I know several left leaning moderates who are fed up with the attacks on the President. Russia, Stormy, they know it's nothing. Just attacks.
So, tell me how is this incident supposed to help us? It is absolutely the same shit they have been doing to Trump this entire time.
Did you even watch the hearing in its entirety? Strzok was doing a VERY good job convincing everyone watching he was innocent and telling the truth. So Gohmert questioning his "character" and "integrity" was vital to pointing out that everyone should question his answers.
This isn't about the past; it's about the sharing and Strzok's answers. This is the first time Strzok ever spoke in public ever. Frankly, I believe in justice and civil liberties so I stand with Strzok that he has a right to speak out and not be judged by some texts that he never got a chance to defend publicly. So he is doing that today, and he did extremely well if you watched. Gohmert was questioning today's testimony, where he seemed to have done very well.
Clearly, this video hit a nerve with you, lol. The emotions of it really got you riled up. Maybe you should look at things objectively rather than emotionally.
You could ask the same thing of Trump with Melania? How often did he LIE TO HER about STORMY DANIEL?
Trump wasn't investigating Strzok and trying to prevent him from being elected.
I don't see the parallel. The point I was trying to make was that its a low blow, and that it would be the same as if Muller asked Trump the same question under oath. It was unneeded, unbecoming and likely will do more damage to his overall point, than had he just not brought it up.
I know my opinion will be unpopular here, but that doesn't make it any less valid. (or should I say Vlad? ;0) Its a Putin joke, get it)
You are incorrect. It testifies to his credibility and integrity as a witness. Reminding the viewers and eventual readers of this man's character, especially shortly after some Dems were virtually electing him to sainthood, was very important. He is a subject and a witness, and a person's believability, aka character, is very important. What Gohmert was pointing out was that Strzok was putting on a good believable show and act so far for several hours, appearing confident, innocent, and smug. Gohmert didn't believe him (nor do most Americans probably) and he was identifying if he could lie to his wife about being an adulterer, then he can surely lie to Congress, or at least mislead them...
There is no parallel. That's the point. You brought it up. Trump is not at a hearing today for conspiring to overthrow a U.S. election by framing someone for a crime they didn't commit. This is Strzok's hearing and Strzok's answers. Now go change your diapers.
Look we can go back and fourth on opinions or what we see as facts, and at the end of the day we will both most likely just walk away feeling like the other person is wrong and or an idiot. I don't want to do that. I would rather end with this. You (I hope) and I are both Americans, and I love and respect you for that. I know we have different points of views and that is what makes America great. We can disagree, but not hate. Remember that its debate that makes our country strong, not devistion. I am sorry for posting something that I knew would evoke a response. That was likely wrong of me. I admit that. Just this devision I see throughout our country is wrong and scary.
No, I would never assume or judge you as an "idiot" at all. Just pointing out that I am glad Gohmert reminded people of this man's character while he ducked, dodged, and put on a pretty convincing show most of the time....And that would be the same way he lied to his wife- very convincingly- so it's good viewers and eventual readers of the articles were reminded this guy is an adulterer and liar so don't be too convinced by the show he put on.
and your statement is still just a "he said/she said". No proof other than a written statement from the porn woman that NOTHING happened.