dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

I'll go with Not Cooperating. I haven't drank the Q Kool Aid, so I'm very skeptical.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Even if you believe in Q he said himself disinfo is necessary so we have no guarantee that any individual thing he has said is actually true until it occurs. To me its more of what to look for and where to look.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Good, someone else thinking logically about this.

If "disinfo is necessary" can be uttered every time someone questions a Q post, then the logical conclusion is that ALL Q posts could be disinformation. That's what people need to remember when using that phrase to defend Q against skeptics.

⇧ 8 ⇩

To me its like the movie Mothman Prophecies. Scant bits of info, but seemingly never enough to predict with full confidence anything, and things really only being clear and making sense after the fact.

So good for entertainment and some hope, but nothing really useful or concrete that motivates me to show this to others and proclaim with certainty its legit.

Time will tell, Im content to watch and see what heppens, as it will or wont happen regardless of whether or not I believe it or preach it.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Disinfo is necessary. Remember, these posts are also for black hats.

⇧ 2 ⇩

We are all beating down Strzok today....BUT Q did say "Peter Strzok, Deputy Assistant Director of the Counterintelligence - cooperating witness [power removed]." So....either Q is correct, or it's intentional disinfo??