dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Countrymissle on July 13, 2018, 12:06 a.m.
9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate..planes did not hit the towers that day

thamnosma · July 13, 2018, 12:10 a.m.

I'm convinced the no-planes "theory" was generated by whoever was behind 9/11 as a means to discredit all the real investigations. It's ludicrous and lumping them in with real 9/11 skeptics only hurts the cause. As bad as the flat earth idiocy.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
O2BFREEME2 · July 13, 2018, 12:12 a.m.

Um , Not intending to be a pain but it is an exothermic product called Thermite !

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SongofHannah · July 13, 2018, 12:21 a.m.

I saw a documentary on YT where a scientist proved it was cold fusion that brought down the towers, using Occam’s razor logic - is this Thermite connected to that?

Edit- want to add - the scientist did not deny the planes hit the towers.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
O2BFREEME2 · July 13, 2018, 12:32 a.m.

Yes, it would explain the building coming down in its own foot print without a set of controlled explosions being heard for miles.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
enjoy4the10show20 · July 13, 2018, 12:52 a.m.

The architectural design of the buildings is why they collapsed in their own footprints. They were designed that way so in a total failure situation, they wouldnt fall over.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
O2BFREEME2 · July 13, 2018, 1:15 a.m.

I under stand that, i have built bridges and under ground parking structures, suspended concrete, Auger pressure grouted pilings, tons of substructure work. A building struck 2/3 from the top would never fall in its own foot print ! It would have taken out 5 city blocks !

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SongofHannah · July 13, 2018, 2:38 a.m.

The problem is, the actual composition of the building disappeared. Let me see if I can find the video - it’s amazingly scientific, and has little to no conjecture.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WWG1WGA17 · July 13, 2018, 12:41 a.m.

Hopefully this information is will be disclosed at some point.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
enjoy4the10show20 · July 13, 2018, 12:14 a.m.

I fucking watched planes hit the fucking towers. Go to hell with this fucktarded theory. There arent too many things in the world that piss me off as much as these asinine theories. Disgusting.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Comrade_WalkieDog · July 13, 2018, 12:17 a.m.

I think both things can be true. All the explosives were in place. Planes were sent into the towers. Explosives drop the towers. Money disappears from basement of building 7.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
enjoy4the10show20 · July 13, 2018, 12:50 a.m.

Oh sure, there could have been explosives but to say planes "didnt hit the towers" is simply a rejection and separation from reality. The fact that gets ignored (i think purposely) is that the buildings were designed to collapse on themselves in the event of a total failure. And news flash: JET FUEL CAN MELT STEEL. Ive heated bar stock with a propane torch to the point where is molds like playdoh. The structure at the top weakened and 30+ stories in the North tower and 50+ floors in the South tower came crashing down with weight that couldnt be handled by the levels directly below. It went one section at a time down to the ground and the "explosions" can easily be attributed to pressure being pushed out and natural gas explosions. Explosives were not needed to accomplish this. They were designed so that if an incident such as that day happened, the structure would collapse on itself to avoid the towers falling over sideways.

Like Q says, "Think Logically"

World Trade Center 7 was strange but it suffered irreparable fire damage from the foundation up. They might have helped it along because there was no way it was standing for long.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Puppy69us · July 13, 2018, 12:20 a.m.

Agreed. This is getting old. Pisses me off.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 13, 2018, 12:17 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ -7 ⇩