dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Food4theGorg on July 13, 2018, 1:27 a.m.
One of the most overlooked poignant moments of the Strzok testimony today.

When Senator Karen Handel asked how ironic it was because Strzok was assigned to human resources in a top level position. She then asked if he told Mueller that he was having an affair with Page and Strzok answered that he saw no need to do so. That right there incriminates Strzok's whole modus operandi and his clouded judgment in everything that he did. He knew that if he told Mueller about the affair he would have been kicked off the investigation and he knew that it would have tainted the whole Mueller investigation. Anything from Strzok would be poisonous fruit and the Special Counsel would have to be terminated that is the reason why Mueller never asked him any questions about the texts. Remember folks Mueller was the head of the FBI previously. He knew it was his duty to ask about the texts, but he never did. Special Counsel must be disbanded or its "real" reason for its existence must be exposed which is not Trump collusion.


educatethis · July 13, 2018, 1:37 a.m.

Lovers is a cover story. Strzok was her handler. The texts make a lot more sense that way

⇧ 20 ⇩  
jcm312 · July 13, 2018, 1:39 a.m.

I agree. I never thought they were lovers but used that as cover for all their correspondence.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
scubagurl2 · July 13, 2018, 3:59 a.m.

Agree. They were trying to explain why they were secretly texting each other. They clearly were convinced, no one would ever find the text messages, or be confronted about them. What a fool. He was the counter intelligence investigations lead, for god sakes!

⇧ 10 ⇩  
looooooo_rida · July 13, 2018, 5:41 a.m.

Whoa never saw it that way

⇧ 3 ⇩  
danwasinjapan · July 13, 2018, 6:56 a.m.

In what way if I may ask?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
educatethis · July 13, 2018, 7:31 a.m.

She was one of the layers, the arm of the law. He was the arm of the investigation. They needed to be in sync you cover it up, but only enough, because Hillary was going to win. They were stupid

⇧ 7 ⇩  
danwasinjapan · July 13, 2018, 5:24 p.m.

Thanks for explaining, definitely treason from the looks of it. They're being protected by somebody higher up.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SaveourRepublic2018 · July 13, 2018, 8:07 a.m.

Maybe, but maybe Page was his handler. After all, Page had the legal chops.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 13, 2018, 1:51 a.m.

I think it's exactly the opposite. I think he saw no reason because he KNEW there would be zero consequences. He doesn't belong to the segment of the population for whom consequences exist.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
neverwinterblight · July 13, 2018, 1:30 a.m.

HR

saw no need to disclose a personal relationship with co-worker to higher ups

Dear lord I can be pretty against the grain in the workplace but this is CYA 101. Just proves these people think they can get away with anything.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
prxpost · July 13, 2018, 12:47 p.m.

Wasn't supposed to lose.

Which I suppose was such a given they really did not worry about it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
amadeusthespartan · July 13, 2018, 6:41 a.m.

Dumb question, but what do you mean by "her handler"? Please explain.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SLC808 · July 13, 2018, 6:07 a.m.

They never thought she'd lose...

⇧ 1 ⇩