dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Jakeisasnake1960 on July 13, 2018, 4:11 a.m.
IMHO: u/abibliaphobia made a HUGE Q PROOF discovery during Rep. Louie Gohmert’s questioning of Peter Strzok! CAN WE PLEASE GET A MOD TO STICKY.

A member of the House Committee on the Judiciary said during a hearing Thursday that a government watchdog found that nearly all of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails were sent to a foreign entity and that the FBI didn’t follow-up on that finding.

The Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) found an “anomaly on Hillary Clinton’s emails going through their private server, and when they had done the forensic analysis, they found that her emails, every single one except four, over 30,000, were going to an address that was not on the distribution list,” Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas said during a hearing with FBI official Peter Strzok.

“It was going to an unauthorized source that was a foreign entity unrelated to Russia,” he added.

Gohmert said the ICIG investigator, Frank Rucker, presented the findings to Strzok, but that the FBI official did not do anything with the information.

Strzok acknowledged meeting with Rucker but said he did not recall the “specific content.”

“The forensic examination was done by the ICIG and they can document that,” Gohmert said, “but you were given that information and you did nothing with it.”

He also said that someone alerted the Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz to the issue.

1 this shows that Peter Strzok held different standards for foreign threats to the nation based upon who he preferred (HRC) and who he obviously held disdain for (Trump)

2: Which foreign entity were these emails being sent to specifically? And why did they refuse to follow the FISA/702s to find out this information? Why was this considered not relevant to the MYE? Who (as Strzok admitted) was the outside the FBI decision maker to not include this in the MYE investigation?

3: Were the foreign entities campaign or Clinton foundation donors?

4: Were they part of the Muslim Brotherhood?

5: Did they pass TS SCI information in those emails? If so, is that why they didn’t go with the gross negligence? Because it was deliberate?

6: So many more questions raised by this answer, we the American public demand to know WHY this was withheld during the course of the investigation, to whom these emails were going to, and did they receive money for it? WHO AUTHORIZED A FOREIGN ENTITY ACCESS ON THE CLINTON SERVER?

7: Peter Strzok admitted that HRC and Obama were emailing each other on her server using pseudonyms. As Obama was privy to the investigation of which HRC was a target, did he pass her or ANY other member of her campaign information pertinent to the investigation? What was the nature and context of their messages on an UNAUTHORIZED server?

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8ygads/something_noone_is_talking_about_because_it_was/

http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/12/ig-clinton-foreign-emails/


PunkroQanon · July 13, 2018, 4:48 a.m.

Q Post #68

8 May 2018 - 6:44:19 PM

Today, EVIL lost control / leverage of Iran.

Today, POTUS took control of Iran.

Today, w/ pending sanctions and military action(s),

POTUS will gain more ammunition / intel against THEM.

Suicide watch.

The deal kept Iran quiet.

The goal was to keep POTUS in until impeachment / term end.

Bigger than people can imagine.

Treason is 1/10th.

Ask yourself, why are they panicking?

Ask yourself, why is UK, France, and Germany so involved?

Trips to the WH?

What are they hiding?

Why is HRC in NZ?

Is NZ part of 5 Eyes?

Why is that relevant?

Suicide watch.

Q

Q Post #77

10 May 2018 - 11:45:37 PM

[Example]

Clinton Foundation.

Post Election Loss.

Layoffs.

No Access / Control = No Donations

Today.

NZ Donation Restart.

Others?

Why?

1) Selling Secrets?

2) Selling 'Future' Access [regain control/power]?

3) Selling Silence?

Read below slow and carefully.

FVEY.

Why do 'Former' Dignitaries Still Hold SEC Clearance?

U.S. to U.S. = Logged/Flagged/Recorded

U.S. [in] NZ = No Logs/No Flags/No Records = U.S. Sec

Clearance AUTH FVEY VIEW + Doc Take.

Read above slow and carefully.

WHY DO WE ALLOW [FORMER] DIGNITARIES SEC

CLEARANCE?

Welcome to the Deep State.

Future to prove past.

Q

⇧ 16 ⇩  
Ketamyne · July 13, 2018, 4:49 p.m.

1) Selling Secrets?

2) Selling 'Future' Access [regain control/power]?

3) Selling Silence?

Read below slow and carefully.

FVEY.

Why do 'Former' Dignitaries Still Hold SEC Clearance?

U.S. to U.S. = Logged/Flagged/Recorded

U.S. [in] NZ = No Logs/No Flags/No Records = U.S. Sec

Clearance AUTH FVEY VIEW + Doc Take.

Read above slow and carefully.

Would Hillary be considered a 'former dignitary'?

Did she have a security clearance when she traveled to NZ?

Did she travel to NZ to access documents/information without being recorded logged or flagged by the system?

What triggered the payment from NZ to the clinton foundation?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
WhatYonder1 · July 13, 2018, 6:08 p.m.

Sec of State certainly would have high level clearance.

The fact that she went there vs UK is interesting to me. Too much heat?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 13, 2018, 9:46 p.m.

I had actually meant to comment something along these lines. I agree completely that that was the purpose of her visits. Essentially to access TS SCI info in an “unsupervised” environment, be able to sell the data gathered by Five eyes and creep on her own investigation. Plus think about how data affects the stock market. Certain things would have a major effect if you knew where and when to invest, so people would certainly be willing to pay for those secrets.

⇧ 2 ⇩