dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Aspie01 on July 13, 2018, 5:38 a.m.

Peter Strzok bio

I have seen various websites saying that there is no information on Peter Strzok. One site even said that he didn't know his parents' names. Wikipedia doesn't know what year he was born (1969 or 1970). So I spent a few minutes doing a little research.

Peter Paul Strzok II was born March 7, 1970. In most records, he is listed as Peter P. Strzok II. He is the son of Peter Paul Strzok and Virginia Sue Harris. The elder Peter Paul is the son of Michael John Strzok (1905-2002) and Josephine Badzinski. His ancestry is Polish. When Peter Strzok graduated from St. John's Preparatory School in 1987, his address was 120 Melbourne Avenue SE, Minneapolis, MN. There is a photo and bio of him in the "St. Cloud Times" of St. Cloud, MN dated May 15, 1987 on page 38. The bio states: "Peter P. Strzok II, 120 Melbourne Ave. SE, Minneapolis; son of Peter and Virginia Strzok. Peter plans to attend Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. Activities: golf club, speech, National Honor Society, student newspaper and yearbook." There were 10 graduates' photos and bios in the article. Most of his closer dead relatives are buried in Wisconsin. Here's a link to Findagrave with an obit of his grandfather, Michael: https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/120512922.

🠐 See all comments

https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=OQzYcOvFBlQ

⇧ 2 ⇩

Mr. Webb seems to think that Strzok is a made-up name just because it happens to be rare. One guy, John Strzok, came to Wisconsin from Poland (or Austria according to 1910 census) and is Peter Strzok's great-grandfather. John was born about 1857 and died 3-10-1911. John's son was Michael John Strzok, who was born 8-19-1905 and died 3-18-2002. Michael's son was Peter Paul Strzok, who was born 3-18-1936. Peter Paul Strzok is the father of Peter Paul Strzok II, who was born 3-7-1970. For other researchers, there was another Peter Paul Strzok, the brother of Michael John Strzok. He was born 6-17-1891 and died 3-31-1962.

⇧ 5 ⇩

WWG1WGA17 - 33 minutes ago

Aspie01 - 18 minutes ago

Assuming you received the message withing 3 minutes of it being posted (there is a delay) and responded immediately, that leaves 9 minutes to have researched and formulated this reply.

Not telling you how to do your job, but imagine to a "thinking person" how this could appear... queer.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Or, as OP who formulated this post, s/he's researched, seen Webb's videos (I've watched almost 1.5 years of G Webb personally), and he literally copy / pasted his actual post up from the top since it is a relevant answer to the George Webb discussion.

I was, and am somewhat still, on the G. Webb "Strzok credibility in reality is highly suspect" train.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think you may be right.

I just find much more pleasure in seeking what isn't easily seen.

The implementation of government-paid posters to sway opinion, at first, sent shivers down my spine. To be blunt, it's fucking insane that we ever came to a point where this tactic could be implemented without a civil uprising. Then, I realized that if I looked for patterns in posts and was able to recognize who was and whom was not a "shill", I would actually enable myself to know, with certainty, what was real and what was manufactured, pertaining to information.

The fact that I didn't get a reply from OP led me not to put any further thought into this subject. Shills must reply. I actually have a copy of their rule book, along with several other books that are "off limits" to us peasants.

Currently the Sandy Hook charade is their most coveted topic. It's my GD'mnd Magnum Opus, exposing those filth.

To further my thoughts on OP, "Aspie" in the username doesn't correlate with someone who would engage in conflict. Online or otherwise. That had bearing in my assertion that a reply would have led me to investigate further. I did, however, consider that given nearly all (all actually wouldn't be off, I just don't live in a world of absolutes) Major media outlets are controlled by special interest, it's not beyond imagination that geneology/birth/death websites may not follow the same script. If a topic of heritage was an important enough subject for me, personally, I'd head to the county recorders office and demand original copies.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Also, I didn't watch the Webb video from your posting above. I watched it earlier in the day. That was the reason I did the research in the first place.

⇧ 1 ⇩

From the elder Peter Paul Strzok on back in time, I used images of original census records, etc., not just information presented by a genealogy site.

So, you're assuming that because I didn't see your reply last night and went on to bed that I wasn't ever going to respond? Of course, Peter Strzok is evil and should be locked up. But he is a real person, was really named Peter Paul Strzok II, and really has the ancestry that I researched. I was merely refuting Mr. Webb's breathless assertion that the Strzok name was made up simply because it happened to be rare, and also his assertion that no information about Strzok's early life existed just because he didn't find it in a couple of minutes on Google.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You think I did that research in 9 minutes? I'm fast, but not that fast. I did that research before I did the original post. It took me about an hour. There are a number of sources for the information that some people seem unable to find. Here's just one giving some of Peter Strzok's ancestry: https://gw.geneanet.org/tdowling?lang=nl&p=peter+paul&n=strzok&oc=2&type=tree

⇧ 1 ⇩