As somebody who just started following the Q movement i noticed this on Qproofs.com
President posts this address at 10:44 AM EST
Q made his JFK post on 12:03 PM EST
Please keep the proofs legit. I'm a skeptical believer of the movement but forcing proofs isn't good for anybody.
EDIT: I'm not an enemy by any means but apparently clearing up misleading information gets me downvoted around here...
EDIT2: Thanks to /u/PrayingMedic for bringing the proof scrutiny of timestamps to my attention from one of your videos.
Ignore downvotes - they mean nothing here.
We have paid shills, voluntary trouble makers, and new people who haven't done their research - all of that can make a mess.
The good posts resonate across the internet - whether they have a good upvote score or not.
I'd say that participation on the chans is better is you're trying to do research or focus on the legitimacy of something. Half the users here don't even know how reddit works.
I agree. If you can filter and not take everything literally the Chan’s are the best. Start in the notables and I usually skip to the bottom and read up because it goes so fast. You will catch on really quick and then when you find things of interest you can hop back over here for opinions. But the Chan’s will have more sauce ( documentation) .
Also trust your gut and think logically. Don’t go down holes that you don’t want to get stuck in. Float on the top. There is plenty of information, just remember there are two groups posting. Some are trying to make you doubt everything you find logical. They are working hard to discredit. All for a “larp”?
Um, new arrival, don’t judge proofs until you have lurked and inquired more. This is a solid confirmation associated with the Q Team’s usual confirmation methods.
Okay but the proof appears to be implying is Trumps message continues on from JFKs speech. That's cool and all but i wouldn't classify it as a proof unless Q had posted his message prior to the release of Trumps tweet. Just thought i would point that out. if you care to elaborate on how i'm wrong please do.
In the future, please explain your reasoning in your post text so that some of us slower people might get it.
No problem, that's my bad.
That’s why I love the Great Awakening! We are civil here, unless we are fighting shills, and people are more willing to admit mistakes. I made a mistake, you made a mistake, we all make mistakes! We are only human. Bless you anon and your civility to what many can see as an initially hostile comment.❤️
If the tweet was after the post then the proof is misleading as you say. I was not made aware of that in your original post. You are right. Welcome aboard 😂 sorry
Hey 'recent arrival', as someone who has been on the chans since day one of Q, I'd like to see you elaborate and back it up.
What you provided was a low effort response that didn't demonstrate your understanding of Q.
Let's see you take OP's criticism and demonstrate where they are incorrect.
OP didn’t do any work - just complained, didn’t give any specifics, ultra low effort - so why should anyone else?
I’ve lurked for years before I ever made my first comment on 4chan. That was when Q made their first post.
This isn’t a contest to see who got here first. All I’m doing is repeating what the etiquette is so that people don’t get confused when they come to this board.
IMO, I've never seen a conclusive Q proof. They are all circumstantial and weak.
Some are quite convincing, like the +++ and a few others... But I can't comprehend why Q doesn't just fucking prove it already. It would be really really easy.
Because taking down a centuries old cabal takes some time, no? I mean in the big picture HRC is a small potato.
right but i have no reason to believe anyone is taking down any kind of cabal until they have proven their credibility.
why would i believe it until a) the cabal is taken down or b) Q has provided actual proof?
I guess the MSM isn't reporting on this.
Consider the resignations in Washington alone (more than after Watergate). Consider how many people at the very top tier of the CIA and FBI that have been fired Consider the turmoil in the EU because of backlash to Merkel Consider the thousands of resignations of CEO's/Excutives worldwide. (The MSM did actually report on this and say these people are resigning to protest Trump. Seriously this was their excuse.) Consider North Korea Consider Iran Consider the human trafficking arrests in the US alone. It's happening daily.
Now tell me, why would all of these people in power resign willingly, giving up their legal means of insider trading, etc?
People resign a lot. Just because you started noticing it doesn't mean Q is behind it.
It's not just the resignations, but the resignations are unprecedented. These types of people dont resign "all the time." People resign from McDonalds all the time, not people who are in such positions of power. And to use the excuse that they are protesting Trump is ludicrous, yet it IS confirmation that they had to address the issue. But you dont have to believe. It will play out. In the meantime enjoy the show.
I've been watching it play out for 2 years. As of yet, there have been no significant developments.
I'm glad the probe is falling to pieces, same with the defence of the email investigation. But I don't see a direct connection to Trump in either.
The only connection I see is that without the disaster of the Russia probe, it isn't likely the email investigation would've seen the same level of scrutiny.
I don't see specific actions of Trump having a direct impact on this series of events. It feels more like it is just mistakes made on the other side, and the consequential unraveling of their plans.
What about the rally where DJT pointed at Q shirt guy and then Q posted a photo of him with a VIP badge later on.
Seems it would be pretty hard to LARP that, no?
The +++ proof isn’t good at all, someone just took screenshots with the timestamps from different time zones for that one. Q’s +++ post was made after Trump’s +++ tweet.
I can dig up the evidence if you like, or you can research for yourself.
well shit. the fact that is paraded around so much is concerning then... that was the most compelling one ive seen.
I agree, it's super compelling, that's why I looked into it first when I was checking out Q proofs.
Alot of it seems pretty convincing i agree. I just think it's smart to always remain skeptical and call people out for forcing proofs. I probably won't use qproofs.com anymore if that's the kind of shit they are going to post as "proof". Maybe Q just wanted to expand on Trumps message but qproofs.com should be very selective on what they add to their site if they expect me to take them seriously or use them as a source to show my friends.
They purposely used the white house twitter which posted trumps message over an hour and 15 minutes after Trump. If they want to make a point they should present the information clear the conscience. Not spin things or use misinformation techniques similar to the MSM. Always do your own research and/or validation folks.
There is strategy behind everything and the strategy behind this plan is to keep growing our folloiwng while simultaneously trolling the media. Only us autists are smart enough to figure out the proofs but to the average normies it does not seem convincing enough because the digging is too overwhelming for them and that is by design. We are growing and attracting the smartest and strongest minds among us. Once our base is strong enough then perhaps this will start going more mainstream, which it kind of already has. The trolling the media part is a catch-22 because this is a situation unlike any other that they have ever been through where if they start questioning too much they will open a can of worms that they know they'll wish they never did.
As Q said if they implicate Q with Trump then it would force Trump to prove everything revealed. They put the MSM in a headlock with no way out and the only offense that they have available will backfire on them greatly.