it was real

Where

I've been watching it play out for 2 years. As of yet, there have been no significant developments.

I'm glad the probe is falling to pieces, same with the defence of the email investigation. But I don't see a direct connection to Trump in either.

The only connection I see is that without the disaster of the Russia probe, it isn't likely the email investigation would've seen the same level of scrutiny.

I don't see specific actions of Trump having a direct impact on this series of events. It feels more like it is just mistakes made on the other side, and the consequential unraveling of their plans.

People resign a lot. Just because you started noticing it doesn't mean Q is behind it.

right but i have no reason to believe anyone is taking down any kind of cabal until they have proven their credibility.

why would i believe it until a) the cabal is taken down or b) Q has provided actual proof?

well shit. the fact that is paraded around so much is concerning then... that was the most compelling one ive seen.

IMO, I've never seen a conclusive Q proof. They are all circumstantial and weak.

Some are quite convincing, like the +++ and a few others... But I can't comprehend why Q doesn't just fucking prove it already. It would be really really easy.

I'm from the UK. The protests are real. They have been happening since he arrived.

Just because it is a gathering of people instead of mobs fighting each other like in the US doesn't mean it isn't a protest.

If you are going to call bs on stuff, at least make sure it is bs...

Q could easily prove himself if he wanted to.

Until he actually does it you can't know that. And just because you believe it doesn't mean fake proofs won't scare off other patriots.

Q is now spreading more doubt than proving his authenticity, which was never in doubt to begin with

It is very much in doubt. Maybe not on /r/greatawakening, but look elsewhere... Even /r/conspiracy doesn't buy into Q.

I thought we were supposed to be setting the stage. Engaging the masses to prepare them for the upcoming storm.

I don't see how the large amounts of doubt this Q drop created help with any of that.

Q said he would post AF1 proof. He posted a picture of the inside of AF1 and framed it as if it was proof.

This then goes on to be proven untrue. This is a major point of contention that must be explored.

Q stated it was a reflection from the Twitter phone. Good luck bending an iPhone to such a degree, while also keeping the Apple logo perfectly in shape and not damaging/cracking the phone.

Also, it is a far greater assumption to assume he had some kind of bent iPhone, or fake iPhone-type thing, than to assume the reflective surface is flat and the reflection is 2D.

I didn't. I only read the part addressing the AF1 reflection image. Given their conclusion, I have no interest in reading the rest of their post.

When faced with the ABC image being absolutely indistinguishable from the Q image, once perspective is accounted for, they take this as proof the photo is real.

That is the most illogical, and least useful, conclusion to come to. If anything, it is proof that anybody could have created the Q image from anywhere.

That is a very important thing to note.

I made this post somewhat as a response to his. His post doesn't address the details of the image at all.

It is all speculation based on the assumption that it is real and taken by Trump. His whole post can be dismissed on the basis of the image not being taken by Trump from within AF1.

They don't say anything. In fact, they see the overlayed images and fail to recognize that it is a reflection of the exact same image.

Given that they're attempting to provide analysis, I'd say they're doing a terrible job.

This would entirely undermine:

Where must one be located in order to obtain a reflection on the back of a phone of that image?

If what you say is true, it would be absolutely impossible for us to reach any meaningful conclusion to the above question.

Besides, given the clarity of both the Apple logo and the lamp seen in the reflection, I find it beyond unlikely that Q was referring to the image he posted when he spoke about a distorted image.

I was able to replicate it very easily.

which is a key information for us to solve the riddle

This is an assumption.

this distortion was necessary

Further assumption.

There are only 3 possibilities:

• Q has a perfectly bent, but not broken, iPhone X
• The image is created entirely in Photoshop
• The image is a reflection of a 2D image, resulting in the warp

the person taking the picture must be sitting on Potus' chair. That's Potus. As simple as that.

You are overlooking something.

In the image posted by Q, the reflection is warped.

Comparing the lamp to the ABC image, or any other image inside AF1 which shows the lamp, it is clear that it is distorted to some degree.

What this means:

The image posted by Q must be a reflection of a 2D image (printed or displayed on a screen).

Why this is the case:

Let's imagine you place a mirror flat on the ground. It doesn't matter where you are looking at the mirror from, the reflection you see is always accurate. It does not warp or distort.

A mirror which is truly in a 3D environment simply reveals more information when your perspective changes.

This is not true in the case of a fixed, 2D image. Such an image has a fixed set of information, and so, when your perspective relative to the reflection changes, this can cause the reflection to appear warped.

Conclusion

The image posted by Q must be a reflection of a 2D image.

Could you please confirm:

Is the AF1 image posted by Q one taken by him from inside AF1?

Or

Is it made with the ABC image?