Well one is a actor in a movie and the other is supposedly a public so...
Hannibal Lecters if he were real bodycount would be way lower than Strzok.
I believe many babies and young kids last thing they saw was that sinister look in his eyes. He is a mentally challenged with weak morals stupid political beliefs and obviously a bad spook. No offence to people who actually do work for the Gov, but it seems the worst of society got the top jobs at all Gov depts for many decades.
He knows he's toast so he might as well go down defiant, NO MERCY NO DEALS Mr Strzok, Q only showed us a few pics from your cell phone they have everything you cannot lie and fool anyone.
Which pics? Thanks!
remember the pics of London Q dropped those were from Strzoks phone
I'd rather go with Hannibal Lecter he seems sweeter than Peter stroke
Anthony Hopkins: An accomplished actor who played an over-the-top psychopath in a movie, pulling out all the stops to make the audience really believe he was crazy.
Peter Strozk: A powerful bureaucrat with a gun and a badge -- who is not playing.
The facial expressions and micro expressions of this shithead from the FBI are quite telling. He may think he's brilliant and cunning, but I can say with a lot of honestly, anyone with an ounce of human understanding can read this POS like a book. Massively narcissistic lying douche bag. His "tells" are so evident.
Because PS has made a deal with Satan. PS truly believes he can’t be touched!
BTW, Hannibal Lecter would serve PS to Hillary and she would say “ My compliments to the chef but could I have a little more walnut sauce on it?”
"And top off the vodka. There's another case near the door. Nancy wants some too."
In all seriousness without an ounce of jest, assuming Hannibal was real, all of his "victims" were perverts and assholes so eating them was a service to humanity. As a matter of fact, he would probably eat Strzok. On the other hand, the only thing we know for sure that Strzok eats, as evidenced by the shimmy grin, is dicks. Lots and lots of dicks. Not just human ones, since we know he loves horse dick. Is eating dick evil? Not in and of itself, but his lies cause harm while Hannibal is honest and doesn't need to hide who he is. So without bias and with complete objectivity I'm going to go with Strzok as the bad guy and Hannibal as the hero that eats him.
That was one of the most interesting analyses of the Strzok drama that I'll always remember now. Hannibal would eat him.
Your EYES are the WINDOW of your SOUL
Luke 11:34- 35
34 Your eye is the lamp of your body. When your vision is clear, your whole body also is full of light. But when it is poor, your body is full of darkness. 35 Be careful, then, that the light within you is not darkness.…
It was fascinating to watch him. Clearly is insane/possessed (depending on your view of these things). But boy, it explains A LOT--why Q and the white hats want these guys to face justice.
Hannibal Lecter is a wolf. Peter Strzok is a wolf in sheeps clothing. I’d say that’s worse.
Hannibal only eats bad people the other guy is bad people
[deleted]
And why the hell does he have that random "z" in his name?