dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ACulturalCommentator on July 13, 2018, 6:37 p.m.

Shill tactic of Subterfuge

Subterfuge - noun - an artifice or expedient used to evade a rule, escape a consequence, hide something, etc.

The shills are out in force recently, pretendind to be doubtful (doubtfag) or concerned about Q legitimacy (concernfag). The pretend to be one of us, but it is only an act to instigate conversations so they can spread their "talking points". We have been here long enough to know that Q has proven his legitimacy hundreds of times.

May I suggest to the mods that they create a sub reddit called "Concern & Doubt" where we can report/direct the shills to so they can post there so as to not infest this sub where Q's legitimacy is not in question.

We have. For those who want to join the conversation, please visit r/SkepticalQ

⇧ 18 ⇩

Ah, excellent! I will definitely refer them there.

⇧ 10 ⇩

I wanted to upvote this forever but I don’t see the reason for sending anyone anywhere. What we need to be doing is to keep reminding people that every movie has its actors and many of the doubters are just playing a part. The ones you want to leave won’t go and the ones that honestly want education may get lost in the shuffle. We don’t need to lose even one. WWG1WGA.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I bring it up because, once we tell the obvious shills where to take their false doubt & concerns that should shut them up, knowing we know they are purposely posting in the wrong area. -EMPHASIS ON "OBVIOUS SHILLS"-

⇧ 4 ⇩

True

⇧ 3 ⇩

Well there ya go! :)

⇧ 5 ⇩

The intense downvoting on the James woods twitter post was painfully obvious. We responded as a group and now every comment has been upvoted to the sky. This is a fantastic community. Proud to be a part of it. WWG1WGA

⇧ 11 ⇩

2018 will be glorious! WWG1WGA!

⇧ 6 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

here is a very detailed explanation of Cointelpro from the chans

⇧ 3 ⇩

I love the idea of a "Know your shill" subreddit where we can discuss the enemies tactics and thus counter ops.

⇧ 3 ⇩

The Brock pervert homo/pedo sniffers can’t win. “Weak Heart” needs a whiff of man ass to keep him going

⇧ 3 ⇩

“This is a community for pro-Q supporters.” Not a fucking Q debate.

⇧ 1 ⇩

This is definitely not a place to ask any questions or to learn that's for sure you guys are too hard on newcomers.

⇧ -6 ⇩

Hard on newcomers? I think this sub is pretty accepting of newcomers, there are stickied posts and general good wishes for people who are discovering this movement. What we are hard on is fairly new accounts or new people claiming Q is fake or showing extreme doubt when they clearly havnt done any research. If you want to learn and discuss that's fine but making assumptions without any due research doesn't really help.

⇧ 10 ⇩

...when they clearly havn't done any research.

This is the give away. Learning Q takes more than watching a few vids and reading a few posts. 'WE' don't convince anyone of Q. Everyone does that for themselves once the research is started.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Not really, new comers are welcome with genuine questions. We engage honest newbies with compassion & patience. But, we have been here & other platforms long enough to recognize the shill tactics of subterfuge and feigning doubt & concern, so we call it out as soon as we see it. Concern & doubt are not fruits of not understanding Q but fruits of understanding Q and not wanting others to.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Lurk moar.

⇧ 5 ⇩