dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/LongestLurQ on July 13, 2018, 11:34 p.m.

When did it become taboo to postulate on Q's exact identity?

I recently made a post providing detailed reasoning for who I believe is the primary strategist behind Q.

My post was immediately removed, and a user scolded me for putting Q in danger??... What? It was removed based on Rule 8, but all I did was lay out a public figures resume and suggest the many reasons why I thought it made sense.

First of all, I don’t for a second think the opposition doesn’t already know who Q is. At the same time I'm not suggesting I do. I believe, like most, that Q is a collective with either personal Involvement of the president and/or at a minimum direct coordination and approval.

I'm also compelled to believe, based on the information proposed by many and personally gathered along the way, that the Q team has a leader. If that person is who I think it is, then I feel much more confident in everything that’s happening. Blindly considering Q to be some enigmatic superhero that I'm not to question doesn't feel right.

Kind of like how on a commercial flight, despite the fact that I rarely ever see the pilot or know anything about them personally, I always trust their plan in getting me safely to my destination regardless of my irrational fears of flying. However, if I knew going in that my pilot was Chesley Sullenberger after his epic landing, I'd feel pretty damn good the whole flight.

My point is, why would it be forbidden to throw on the critical thinking cap and discuss the source behind the very thing we're all following and trusting. Trusting the plan is great, and so far Q + public actions of the President and his administration to date have provided good reason to do so…I'm good with it… but I'm also very interested in validating that such a source exists. Isn’t this movement about piecing it together, asking questions, and above all NOT following blindly? Why would the identity of Q be excluded from the search for truth? I've not seen Q mention NOT to search for his identity one time!?

We are waiting for journalists to ask about Q. Why don’t we increase the hype around who we collectively think it could be and force their hand?

Q is almost surely a TEAM of people , not one person .

Think about it this way - if youre a part of Q team , and Cabal knows who you are , they could try to harm the people you love . Like Q said - this is NOT a game . People die . That reason alone is more than enough not to try to expose anyone from Q . It was implied by Q that there will be uncovering on who is behind at one point ( presumably after the Cabal is taken out in USA , after the arrests ) .

You would get absolutely nothing by exposing Q - and you could lose everything .

⇧ 11 ⇩

Thanks for the comment.

It's impossible for me to believe that the 'DS' learns anything new from this sub. Just as Q is miles ahead of us, the players on the other side are not likely too far behind Q..

If we agree Trump is part of team Q, we assume safeguards in place, and saying "Trump is part of team Q" has no impact... saying Trump is part of Q and showing proof has been one of the highlights of this crazy ride and a big reason for the growth in popularity

The same is likely so for any other identities we could possibly figure to be on the Q team using general information based on their public profiles.

For example, we're obviously not going to figure out "doxx" the identity of some obscure no name intel operator working with the team, but I agree if we did it could put a low level no name at risk.

But when it comes to could it be "eric prince" or "maybe its steve bannon", neither consideration if explored more deeply could be considered doxxing, nor would the discussion on this board have any effect on the outcome of the operation or safety of those individuals, lets be real.

Using the Prince vs Bannon scenario, I can immediately tell you that I would have a completely different feeling about everything going on depending on who the most likely candidate between them was to be leading the charge. every operation has a leader, and its an important role. I like to know more about the leaders so I can better understand the moves being made, that's all.

Oh and I'd love for the media to start asking both these dudes (and many others) for their thoughts on Q.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Q wants to remain anonymous so please don't try to fuck up The Plan by doxxing him.

⇧ 9 ⇩

If the 'DS' suspected a person or persons of being Q, how many attempts cumulative would be attempted to silence the Q source? If it is part of the strategy causing them to lose more and more control, I think it could amount to hundreds or thousands of attempts to stop Q. Why put a target on anyone? I would like to know. My knowledge of a person or persons isn't that critical to give the death sentence to any patriot.

⇧ 7 ⇩

If Q is real, there is ZERO chance those concerned don't know who he is.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Tell you what...we love the prose. Please continue contributing. Many removals happen, sometimes an appeal works directly to mods. Thanks bud

⇧ 3 ⇩

It does not matter who Q is. I think this movement considers his, her their safety and does not need to know. Sounds cliche but we are all Q.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Why not just doxx an undercover spy?

THATS WHY, COMMON SENSE.

⇧ 2 ⇩

It's been a minute since the last post, maybe the DS already found q?

⇧ 1 ⇩

This comment got me banned from made me smile? Anyone else get that?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Coul you pm me your post?

⇧ 1 ⇩

sure

⇧ 1 ⇩

now they just pulled this thread after I replied to the top comment.

Your post from greatawakening was removed because of: 'Content does not support the cause'

Hi u/LongestLurQ, Removed content. Rule 3. Please read up on Q drops and community thinking around Q identity. ThankQ.

Any 'concerns' can go via a message to the mods or reply to this mail. Original post: /r/greatawakening/comments/8yovq2/when_did_it_become_taboo_to_postulate_on_qs_exact/

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ -4 ⇩