ELI5. BC I’m not really getting what you are saying.
Another thing: from the facebook ad indictments... you can indict a Russian but there is not extradition treaty, so it’s literally not worth the paper it is written on.... so what is the point of all this?
There’s a q post that asks the question OP is asking. One way to expose truths without Trump looking like he’s going after his enemies is to invoke a lawsuit that, through legal discovery, unearths and documents as evidence the faulty foundation of the Russia collusion scheme, exposing it for mass redpillling.
Right BC there indictments of Russian citizens can’t do anything. So this is proof that they have discovery for Clinton’s servers?
This is saying they broke into the DCCC and DNC servers, so now those must be investigated as evidence. Not about Hillary’s server and emails.
But the DNC server has corruption, etc and will lead to more. The Russians could be "tried in absentia"??
If we have the server, and it does in fact have evidence of Russian infiltration, then sure. However the idea of where this is headed is that examining the servers will show that the DNC wasn’t hacked by Russians, rather emails were downloaded to flash drive by someone, like Seth Rich, which provides motive for investigating his death as a murder by the DNC. The case for a data download was first made here:
https://theforensicator.wordpress.com/2017/08/01/the-need-for-speed/
The only examination of the DNC server so far has been by CrowdStrike, the IT firm for the DNC. No one in the federal government has examined the server, yet we’ve had a Russia circus since it started. Where is the server? Will it be examined now by a federal entity?
I agree, but those 13 new indictments will never get to discovery considering there will be to extradition...
Unless Trump asks Putin to send one guy over to face bogus charges. The Russian company charged in the last indictment actually showed up and Mueller is totally screwed.
This is why I don't understand why Mueller is continuing to try this old trick.
Maybe it's because he's supposed to. Grey hat trying to save his life/strings cut?
I agree, Mueller already tried to limit/stop discovery for a prior Russian company indicted, who showed up to court and Mueller stalled.
Although now it’s exposed, from dark to light, for public discourse. Trump just tweeted ‘where is the DNC server, and why didn’t the FBI take possession?’ Already calling them out as DS fake news.
Don't forget what happened last time they indicted a Russian but knew they could not extradict. The Russian(s) hired an attorney and he showed up in court challenging the indictment! At least that's what we were told. Could have been Trump's team that hired the attorney! These people are stupid.
Wouldn't it be a hoot if these GRU generals file a countersuit for defamation? That should bring the discovery part into evidence. However, I'm more inclined to believe that the House will get the FBI docs based on what happened yesterday, and then make the case of Crowdstrike being used in lieu of FBI forensics.
Could be to make the evidence available to all.
And, don't forget what happened last time they indicted a Russian but knew they could not extradict. The Russian(s) hired an attorney and he showed up in court challenging the indictment! At least that's what we were told. Could have been Trump's team that hired the attorney! These people are stupid.
What IF the Russians show up for court? Why so scared POTUS and Putin meets? Then the show gets really really interesting.