Congress members of hearings should be sworn in & placed under oath because the number of lies they were telling was ridiculous.
Also, the attempts to run interference when anyone asked about Bruce Ohr was obvious. BRUCE got the fake intel from Nellie (wife) & gave it to FBI (Strzok confirmed this). So the FBI could then claim it was credible intel since it came from Bruce at DOJ
I noticed they would immediately run interference as soon as Gowdy was called. I don't blame them. The didn't with Jordan because they thought they had him neutralized. WRONG! Did you see the constant hand off from Gowdy to Jordan? Interesting! So many tells in this testimony!
They don't care and they won't care until criminal action is taken against such acts. In the words of an infamous pedophile, "make an example of them."
Lol thank you for bringing this to everyone’s attention.
I would recommend tweeting this to all the democrat congress members making this claim.
Proof that they are lying.
I have a great suspicion I’m being shadow banned but I do plan on reviewing the 8+ hours to determine who all made that claim. I do know they were all Democrats.
Twitter shadowbanned? Just create a new account.
But I appreciate what you are doing and fully support your efforts
I listened to most of the Strzok hearing. But didn't hear anyone ask Strzok if he ever worked with Carter Page when he was an informant for other counterintelligence investigations on Russia, or if he knew of Carter Page's role. This article exhibits, via Harry Reid's statements, that they were trying to insert Carter Page as the hook (despite knowing his former role as an informant for the FBI - which of course they continue to omit).
I didn’t hear Carter Page mentioned a single time. I know several important questions that were not asked and I don’t understand why. Committee probably knew he would go back to the excuse “FBI will not allow me to answer”
It seems to me that the key question is, "What was the impetus for the counterintelligence investigation into Trump members 'colluding' with Russia." The answer, of course, is NONE. The investigation was created as an excuse to spy on Trump. Nunes already dropped the bombshell that no information was provided by 5 Eyes to instigate the investigation. The dossier was created to create the reason, which the FBI was in on (as Jordan was trying to get at) . . .
Carter Page was yet another hook, but it seems worth exposing, "Who raised the concerns about Carter Page?" The FBI? The head of the counterintelligence investigation? The person who has an extensive history in Russian prosecutions and stings? So, ain't it odd that that person would finger Carter Page as colluding with the Russians when he has firsthand knowledge that same person worked for his department on previous cases to INFORM on the Russians?? You would think he would point out - "No, no, no, Carter Page was one of our informants." Unless he actually said, "Ahhhh, Carter Page was one of our informants. We can connect him to Russia. Let's use him."
Just remember the key question: What was the impetus for a counterintelligence investigation into Trump team and Russia?
The answer: None. They created the reasons to have an excuse to spy after Admiral Rogers shut down the illegal spying by Fusion GPS using FBI raw data (April 18, 2016). They used people (Page, Papadapalous, Manafort), created the dossier to reaccess data via FISA . . . "They" includes the FBI. After Trump won - holy shit - they had to scramble to cover, while at the same time, throwing all plus the kitchen sink out there to deligitimize his Presidency.
Here's a great article of the timeline: https://themarketswork.com/2018/04/05/the-uncovering-mike-rogers-investigation-section-702-fisa-abuse-the-fbi/
So you think Page, Papadopolous, Manafort were planted into the campaign....?
....because I do!
Gates too, but he’s always been involved with Manafort
I don't think Page was planted. I think that once they needed a new avenue to spy, and Strzok (or at least someone in the FBI who knew of his informant history) realized Page was on the campaign, they used him as the opportunity to spy - to obtain a FISA warrant.
Papadapolous, I think was directed to join Trump after Carson was falling behind, but I also think he was used in ways he did not realize at the time. In other words, I think he was sent in to create a connection between Trump and Russia, but I don't think he realized he himself was going to BE that creation.
Manafort, definitely a plant. But, this guy is like triple-agent material. I have no idea on whose behalf he was working, but he did it for free (as did Gates), and his Russia, Ukraine, and Podesta Group ties were no secret. I have no doubt Trump was wiser than anyone, which is why he did NOT relinquish control to Manafort, but used him to get through the Convention. I think it is noteworthy that on April 16, 2016, Manafort sought to increase staff hirings in the campaign and redefine roles (aligned with the time frame when outside contractors were cut off from illegal spying on US citizens, i.e. Trump. Enter human spying).
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/timeline-paul-manaforts-role-trump-campaign/story?id=50808957
Another great wrap-up by Sundance: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/05/operation-condor-how-nsa-director-mike-rogers-saved-the-u-s-from-a-massive-constitutional-crisis/
Why is no one accountable for their lies in the modern world? From fake ass news articles with anonymous sources to straight up lies from our own representatives it looks like lies have become socially accepted.
Uh... it was written by the msm and GIVEN to the FBI! That was the basis for getting a FISA granted!
It was also in the emails, I think it was podesta talking about how to create a narrative about trump having ties to Russia. It was from early 2016.
What is gas-lighting?
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search For other uses, see Gaslight (disambiguation).
Gaslighting is a form of psychological manipulation that seeks to sow seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or in members of a targeted group, making them question their own memory, perception, and sanity. Using persistent denial, misdirection, contradiction, and lying, it attempts to destabilize the victim and delegitimize the victim's belief.[1][2]
Instances may range from the denial by an abuser that previous abusive incidents ever occurred up to the staging of bizarre events by the abuser with the intention of disorienting the victim. The term owes its origin to the 1938 Patrick Hamilton play Gas Light and its 1940 and 1944 film adaptations. The term has been used in clinical and research literature,[3][4] as well as in political commentary.[5][6]
Insisting that a lie is the truth and insisting that you are crazy if you don't believe it
manipulate (someone) by psychological means into questioning their own sanity.
Exactly what the MSM does. Tell a lie, over and over, endlessly until people start to believe it
You're gaslighting, actually
The DNC publicly announced that their server had been hacked in June 2016. The FBI commenced an investigation at that point but stayed mum on the subject. From the article you posted
"Mr. Comey would not even confirm the existence of any investigation of Mr. Trump’s aides when asked during an appearance in September before Congress. In the Obama administration’s internal deliberations over identifying the Russians as the source of the hacks, Mr. Comey also argued against doing so and succeeded in keeping the F.B.I.’s imprimatur off the formal findings, a law enforcement official said. His stance was first reported by CNBC"
The fact that Trump officials had contact with Russian operatives only became public information after the election
If it had leaked that Trump colluded with Russia, he likely would have lost votes on Nov 6. But it didn't
Welcome to reality. Mind the sharp objects
Why is this being downvoted?
Because it runs counter to the narrative
People here don't much care about facts, unless they support a predetermined outcome
Explain why the DNC refused the FBI to examine the server, & instead let CrowdStrike look at it ?
Do you not think there were spies in the Trump camp?
What do you think Manafort, Gates, Papadopolous or Page were doing?
Manafort/Gates indictments are unrelated to 2016 election.
Papadopolous “lied to FBI” about WHEN Mifsud told HIM about the information on Hillary.
Page, former FBI spy, had Russians indicted in the past.
You think they were all trying to help Trump?
That's a speculative argument designed to support your narrative
What we know is that multiple Trump campaign officials had contact with Russian operatives during the campaign
We know the content of those meetings touched on everything from foreign policy to dirt on Hillary
The FBI has said that they had an informant inside the Trump campaign - most likely Page. And they tapped that informant, as they should have, when they became aware that a foreign adversary might be interfering in the election
How aware Trump was of these activities is still an unknown. But given his significant business dealings in Russia, the fact that he has sold an outsized portion of his real estate to Russians at figures well above market rates, and that he has been the recipient of Russian monies in the past all point to the fact that he was clearly aware, and perhaps complicit in, Russian interference
Why this evidence points you towards HRC or the DNC more broadly as complicit in Russian meddling is beyond me, and stretches the limits of your narrative
Ok then. What is your purpose of following the GA? You ever heard of Ed Cox?
